META-ANALYSIS OF MIND MAPPING IN VOCABULARY LEARNING OF THE PAST DECADE

Winda Sari, Ilham Ilham, Hijril Ismail
{"title":"META-ANALYSIS OF MIND MAPPING IN VOCABULARY LEARNING OF THE PAST DECADE","authors":"Winda Sari, Ilham Ilham, Hijril Ismail","doi":"10.25134/erjee.v11i2.7610","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The type of research used is meta-analysis research aimed at determining the level of effectiveness or quality of mind mapping in vocabulary learning, including at elementary, middle, high school, and college levels. This quality was examined using several previous research results that collected data with inclusion and exclusion conditions from the Google Scholar, DOAJ, and Scopus databases. The search results found up to 51 dates that met the requirements with the number of students (N), F-counts, t-counts, and r-counts. The results of data analysis obtained by the simulation software JASP showed that the impact on learning media vocabulary based on mind mapping is 73% significant, which included the High category. The moderator variable is the lowest level of education, the high impact of using mind mapping, namely the college level, with an estimate of the effect of 0.569, Based on the number of participants, the application of mind mapping has more influence on participants totaling more than 30 students with an estimate of 0.928 (strong category), while the lowest effect is seen from the number of participants who collected more than 91 students with an estimate of 0.529, meaning that this mind mapping learning model is most appropriate to be applied in high school rows with more than 30 participants in order to maximize student learning outcomes. \n  ","PeriodicalId":31456,"journal":{"name":"English Review Journal of English Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"English Review Journal of English Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25134/erjee.v11i2.7610","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The type of research used is meta-analysis research aimed at determining the level of effectiveness or quality of mind mapping in vocabulary learning, including at elementary, middle, high school, and college levels. This quality was examined using several previous research results that collected data with inclusion and exclusion conditions from the Google Scholar, DOAJ, and Scopus databases. The search results found up to 51 dates that met the requirements with the number of students (N), F-counts, t-counts, and r-counts. The results of data analysis obtained by the simulation software JASP showed that the impact on learning media vocabulary based on mind mapping is 73% significant, which included the High category. The moderator variable is the lowest level of education, the high impact of using mind mapping, namely the college level, with an estimate of the effect of 0.569, Based on the number of participants, the application of mind mapping has more influence on participants totaling more than 30 students with an estimate of 0.928 (strong category), while the lowest effect is seen from the number of participants who collected more than 91 students with an estimate of 0.529, meaning that this mind mapping learning model is most appropriate to be applied in high school rows with more than 30 participants in order to maximize student learning outcomes.   
近十年来思维导图在词汇学习中的元分析
所使用的研究类型是荟萃分析研究,旨在确定词汇学习中思维导图的有效性或质量水平,包括小学、中学、高中和大学水平。使用之前的几项研究结果对这种质量进行了检查,这些研究结果从Google Scholar、DOAJ和Scopus数据库中收集了包含和排除条件的数据。搜索结果发现,多达51个日期符合学生人数(N)、F计数、t计数和r计数的要求。通过模拟软件JASP获得的数据分析结果表明,基于思维导图的学习媒体词汇的影响为73%,其中包括高类别。调节变量是受教育程度最低、使用思维导图影响较大的学生,即大学水平,估计效果为0.569。根据参与者人数,思维导图的应用对参与者的影响较大,共有30多名学生,估计为0.928(强类别),而效果最低的是收集了91多名学生的参与者人数,估计为0.529,这意味着这种思维导图学习模型最适合应用于30多名参与者的高中生,以最大限度地提高学生的学习成果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信