Fintech and Islamic banking growth: new evidence

IF 5.7 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Mouwafac Sidaoui, Faten Ben Bouheni, Zandanbal Arslankhuyag, Samuele Mian
{"title":"Fintech and Islamic banking growth: new evidence","authors":"Mouwafac Sidaoui, Faten Ben Bouheni, Zandanbal Arslankhuyag, Samuele Mian","doi":"10.1108/jrf-03-2022-0049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThe purpose of this study is to evaluate the global developments in the area of fintech solutions by analyzing Islamic and Conventional banks core accounting and market analysis IFIs and their impact on financial inclusion within its core markets.Design/methodology/approachThe authors collect and analyze annual accounting and market Data of the top ten largest Islamic banks and the top ten US Conventional banks, in terms of Total Asset and Market Capitalization, from Bloomberg Data.FindingsThe analysis of Bloomberg data shows higher risk-return for Islamic banks–except ROE Market measure that we suggest-than US conventional banks. Nonetheless, Islamic banking grew faster than conventional banking over the period 2006–2021. As a business model, we find that Islamic banks take more credit with more than seventy percent of their profit from loans, while US conventional banks struggle to reach seventy percent interest rate ratio. The authors’ research documents that Fintech and digitalization are driving Islamic finance growth during financial and economic downturns.Research limitations/implicationsFinTech data is not available for banks, further insights of analysis on FinTech and Innovations in the banking sectors.Practical implicationsIslamic banks continuously innovate to satisfy the users of their services and Fintech is opportune to innovation. This study could be interesting for both practitioners and academics wishing to understand and compare Islamic and conventional banking futures.Social implicationsThe authors compared two banking systems, the US and Islamic Banks, which could be useful for users to differentiate between those banking operations.Originality/valueThe authors collected accounting and market data from Bloomberg of top 10 Islamic and top 10 US Conventional banks from 2006 to 2021 to examine Risk-Return, Growth and Business Model of those banks. The authors propose a new Risk-Return measure ROE-Market and its volatility.","PeriodicalId":46579,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Risk Finance","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Risk Finance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jrf-03-2022-0049","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this study is to evaluate the global developments in the area of fintech solutions by analyzing Islamic and Conventional banks core accounting and market analysis IFIs and their impact on financial inclusion within its core markets.Design/methodology/approachThe authors collect and analyze annual accounting and market Data of the top ten largest Islamic banks and the top ten US Conventional banks, in terms of Total Asset and Market Capitalization, from Bloomberg Data.FindingsThe analysis of Bloomberg data shows higher risk-return for Islamic banks–except ROE Market measure that we suggest-than US conventional banks. Nonetheless, Islamic banking grew faster than conventional banking over the period 2006–2021. As a business model, we find that Islamic banks take more credit with more than seventy percent of their profit from loans, while US conventional banks struggle to reach seventy percent interest rate ratio. The authors’ research documents that Fintech and digitalization are driving Islamic finance growth during financial and economic downturns.Research limitations/implicationsFinTech data is not available for banks, further insights of analysis on FinTech and Innovations in the banking sectors.Practical implicationsIslamic banks continuously innovate to satisfy the users of their services and Fintech is opportune to innovation. This study could be interesting for both practitioners and academics wishing to understand and compare Islamic and conventional banking futures.Social implicationsThe authors compared two banking systems, the US and Islamic Banks, which could be useful for users to differentiate between those banking operations.Originality/valueThe authors collected accounting and market data from Bloomberg of top 10 Islamic and top 10 US Conventional banks from 2006 to 2021 to examine Risk-Return, Growth and Business Model of those banks. The authors propose a new Risk-Return measure ROE-Market and its volatility.
金融科技与伊斯兰银行业增长:新证据
本研究的目的是通过分析伊斯兰和传统银行的核心会计和市场分析国际金融机构及其对其核心市场内金融包容性的影响,评估金融科技解决方案领域的全球发展。设计/方法/方法作者收集并分析了来自彭博数据的十大伊斯兰银行和美国十大传统银行的年度会计和市场数据,按总资产和市值计算。对彭博数据的分析显示,除了我们建议的ROE市场指标外,伊斯兰银行的风险回报高于美国传统银行。尽管如此,在2006年至2021年期间,伊斯兰银行业的增长速度高于传统银行业。作为一种商业模式,我们发现伊斯兰银行70%以上的利润来自贷款,而美国传统银行很难达到70%的利率比率。作者的研究表明,金融科技和数字化在金融和经济衰退期间推动了伊斯兰金融的增长。研究限制/影响金融科技数据不可用于银行,金融科技和银行业创新分析的进一步见解。伊斯兰银行不断创新以满足其服务的用户,金融科技是创新的良机。对于希望了解和比较伊斯兰银行和传统银行未来的从业者和学者来说,这项研究可能很有趣。社会意义作者比较了两种银行体系,美国银行和伊斯兰银行,这可能有助于用户区分这两种银行业务。作者从彭博社收集了2006年至2021年10大伊斯兰银行和10大美国传统银行的会计和市场数据,对这些银行的风险回报、增长和商业模式进行了研究。本文提出了一种新的风险收益度量方法——资本市场及其波动率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Risk Finance
Journal of Risk Finance BUSINESS, FINANCE-
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
6.70%
发文量
37
期刊介绍: The Journal of Risk Finance provides a rigorous forum for the publication of high quality peer-reviewed theoretical and empirical research articles, by both academic and industry experts, related to financial risks and risk management. Articles, including review articles, empirical and conceptual, which display thoughtful, accurate research and be rigorous in all regards, are most welcome on the following topics: -Securitization; derivatives and structured financial products -Financial risk management -Regulation of risk management -Risk and corporate governance -Liability management -Systemic risk -Cryptocurrency and risk management -Credit arbitrage methods -Corporate social responsibility and risk management -Enterprise risk management -FinTech and risk -Insurtech -Regtech -Blockchain and risk -Climate change and risk
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信