Mouwafac Sidaoui, Faten Ben Bouheni, Zandanbal Arslankhuyag, Samuele Mian
{"title":"Fintech and Islamic banking growth: new evidence","authors":"Mouwafac Sidaoui, Faten Ben Bouheni, Zandanbal Arslankhuyag, Samuele Mian","doi":"10.1108/jrf-03-2022-0049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThe purpose of this study is to evaluate the global developments in the area of fintech solutions by analyzing Islamic and Conventional banks core accounting and market analysis IFIs and their impact on financial inclusion within its core markets.Design/methodology/approachThe authors collect and analyze annual accounting and market Data of the top ten largest Islamic banks and the top ten US Conventional banks, in terms of Total Asset and Market Capitalization, from Bloomberg Data.FindingsThe analysis of Bloomberg data shows higher risk-return for Islamic banks–except ROE Market measure that we suggest-than US conventional banks. Nonetheless, Islamic banking grew faster than conventional banking over the period 2006–2021. As a business model, we find that Islamic banks take more credit with more than seventy percent of their profit from loans, while US conventional banks struggle to reach seventy percent interest rate ratio. The authors’ research documents that Fintech and digitalization are driving Islamic finance growth during financial and economic downturns.Research limitations/implicationsFinTech data is not available for banks, further insights of analysis on FinTech and Innovations in the banking sectors.Practical implicationsIslamic banks continuously innovate to satisfy the users of their services and Fintech is opportune to innovation. This study could be interesting for both practitioners and academics wishing to understand and compare Islamic and conventional banking futures.Social implicationsThe authors compared two banking systems, the US and Islamic Banks, which could be useful for users to differentiate between those banking operations.Originality/valueThe authors collected accounting and market data from Bloomberg of top 10 Islamic and top 10 US Conventional banks from 2006 to 2021 to examine Risk-Return, Growth and Business Model of those banks. The authors propose a new Risk-Return measure ROE-Market and its volatility.","PeriodicalId":46579,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Risk Finance","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Risk Finance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jrf-03-2022-0049","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
Abstract
PurposeThe purpose of this study is to evaluate the global developments in the area of fintech solutions by analyzing Islamic and Conventional banks core accounting and market analysis IFIs and their impact on financial inclusion within its core markets.Design/methodology/approachThe authors collect and analyze annual accounting and market Data of the top ten largest Islamic banks and the top ten US Conventional banks, in terms of Total Asset and Market Capitalization, from Bloomberg Data.FindingsThe analysis of Bloomberg data shows higher risk-return for Islamic banks–except ROE Market measure that we suggest-than US conventional banks. Nonetheless, Islamic banking grew faster than conventional banking over the period 2006–2021. As a business model, we find that Islamic banks take more credit with more than seventy percent of their profit from loans, while US conventional banks struggle to reach seventy percent interest rate ratio. The authors’ research documents that Fintech and digitalization are driving Islamic finance growth during financial and economic downturns.Research limitations/implicationsFinTech data is not available for banks, further insights of analysis on FinTech and Innovations in the banking sectors.Practical implicationsIslamic banks continuously innovate to satisfy the users of their services and Fintech is opportune to innovation. This study could be interesting for both practitioners and academics wishing to understand and compare Islamic and conventional banking futures.Social implicationsThe authors compared two banking systems, the US and Islamic Banks, which could be useful for users to differentiate between those banking operations.Originality/valueThe authors collected accounting and market data from Bloomberg of top 10 Islamic and top 10 US Conventional banks from 2006 to 2021 to examine Risk-Return, Growth and Business Model of those banks. The authors propose a new Risk-Return measure ROE-Market and its volatility.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Risk Finance provides a rigorous forum for the publication of high quality peer-reviewed theoretical and empirical research articles, by both academic and industry experts, related to financial risks and risk management. Articles, including review articles, empirical and conceptual, which display thoughtful, accurate research and be rigorous in all regards, are most welcome on the following topics: -Securitization; derivatives and structured financial products -Financial risk management -Regulation of risk management -Risk and corporate governance -Liability management -Systemic risk -Cryptocurrency and risk management -Credit arbitrage methods -Corporate social responsibility and risk management -Enterprise risk management -FinTech and risk -Insurtech -Regtech -Blockchain and risk -Climate change and risk