The Gospel of Judas: A New Translation with Introduction and Commentary by David Brakke (review)

IF 0.2 3区 哲学 0 RELIGION
S. McGinn
{"title":"The Gospel of Judas: A New Translation with Introduction and Commentary by David Brakke (review)","authors":"S. McGinn","doi":"10.1353/cbq.2023.0057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In chap. 4, B. discusses the historical plausibility that Onesimus was a broker negotiating with Paul, Philemon, and the church in Philemon’s household. To endorse this idea, B. draws a parallel between the role of Epaphroditus in Philippians (2:25; 4:18) and that of Onesimus in Philemon, as both figures were sent to the incarcerated apostle Paul so as to help him out. B. also singles out the parallel between Burrhus, a deacon in the Epistle of Ignatius to the Ephesians, and Onesimus in Philemon in that both were the envoys dispatched to Paul during his imprisonment. Evidence from both nonbiblical and extrabiblical texts leads B. to conclude that Onesimus was a deacon, since in earliest Christianity prison visitation was one of the specific duties of a deacon. Beavis divides the last chapter into two smaller sections. First, she discusses the historical reconstruction of Philemon through an intertextual analysis of the letter to the Colossians and Ignatius’s letter to the Ephesians, at the same time maintaining focus on Onesimus. By and large, such an intertextual study generates a fresh image of Onesimus as a devout and trustworthy disciple. Second, B. investigates the reception of Onesimus in church history. Ecclesiastical tradition tends to remember Onesimus as the bishop of Ephesus or as one of the martyrs in earliest Christianity. B. emphasizes that Onesimus has historically been commemorated variously as a significant figure, perhaps a deacon, a bishop, a witness, or a saint. Beavis concludes her study with an ingenious afterword that conjures up the silenced voice of Onesimus, which is hidden but retrievable in Philemon through imaginary conversations with the former slaves, both ancient and modern, based on their stories. This creatively crafted afterword is sufficient to inspire readers to reread Philemon from a doulocentric standpoint. Overall, B.’s retelling of Philemon from a marginal perspective illustrates the possibility of hearing the voices of the silenced and restoring agency to the oppressed throughout the history of Christianity. This innovative book is highly recommended to any students, laypeople, church leaders, and theologians who are committed to fostering the Christian virtue of social justice by interpreting biblical texts in other ways.","PeriodicalId":45718,"journal":{"name":"CATHOLIC BIBLICAL QUARTERLY","volume":"85 1","pages":"353 - 355"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CATHOLIC BIBLICAL QUARTERLY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/cbq.2023.0057","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In chap. 4, B. discusses the historical plausibility that Onesimus was a broker negotiating with Paul, Philemon, and the church in Philemon’s household. To endorse this idea, B. draws a parallel between the role of Epaphroditus in Philippians (2:25; 4:18) and that of Onesimus in Philemon, as both figures were sent to the incarcerated apostle Paul so as to help him out. B. also singles out the parallel between Burrhus, a deacon in the Epistle of Ignatius to the Ephesians, and Onesimus in Philemon in that both were the envoys dispatched to Paul during his imprisonment. Evidence from both nonbiblical and extrabiblical texts leads B. to conclude that Onesimus was a deacon, since in earliest Christianity prison visitation was one of the specific duties of a deacon. Beavis divides the last chapter into two smaller sections. First, she discusses the historical reconstruction of Philemon through an intertextual analysis of the letter to the Colossians and Ignatius’s letter to the Ephesians, at the same time maintaining focus on Onesimus. By and large, such an intertextual study generates a fresh image of Onesimus as a devout and trustworthy disciple. Second, B. investigates the reception of Onesimus in church history. Ecclesiastical tradition tends to remember Onesimus as the bishop of Ephesus or as one of the martyrs in earliest Christianity. B. emphasizes that Onesimus has historically been commemorated variously as a significant figure, perhaps a deacon, a bishop, a witness, or a saint. Beavis concludes her study with an ingenious afterword that conjures up the silenced voice of Onesimus, which is hidden but retrievable in Philemon through imaginary conversations with the former slaves, both ancient and modern, based on their stories. This creatively crafted afterword is sufficient to inspire readers to reread Philemon from a doulocentric standpoint. Overall, B.’s retelling of Philemon from a marginal perspective illustrates the possibility of hearing the voices of the silenced and restoring agency to the oppressed throughout the history of Christianity. This innovative book is highly recommended to any students, laypeople, church leaders, and theologians who are committed to fostering the Christian virtue of social justice by interpreting biblical texts in other ways.
《犹大福音书》:大卫·布拉克的新译介(书评)
在第4章中,b讨论了历史上的可能性,即阿尼西母是一个中间人,与保罗、腓利门和腓利门家里的教会进行谈判。为了支持这个观点,b把以巴弗提在腓立比书中的角色(2:25;4:18)和腓利门的阿尼西母,因为这两个人都被派去帮助被监禁的使徒保罗。B.还挑出了以弗所人伊格那丢书信中的执事Burrhus和腓利门的阿尼西母之间的相似之处,因为他们都是保罗在监禁期间派往他那里的使节。来自非圣经和非圣经文本的证据使b得出结论,认为阿尼西母是一名执事,因为在最早的基督教中,探视监狱是执事的具体职责之一。比维斯把最后一章分成两个较小的部分。首先,她讨论了腓利门的历史重建,通过对歌罗西书和依纳丢给以弗所书的互文分析,同时关注阿尼西母。总的来说,这样的互文研究产生了阿尼西母作为一个虔诚和值得信赖的门徒的新形象。第二,B.调查教会历史上对阿尼西母的接待。教会传统倾向于把阿尼西母记作以弗所的主教,或是早期基督教的殉道者之一。B.强调阿尼西母在历史上作为一个重要的人物被各种各样的纪念,也许是执事,主教,证人,或者圣人。Beavis用一个巧妙的后记来结束她的研究,让人想起阿尼西母沉默的声音,这是隐藏的,但在腓利门书中通过想象的对话,与以前的奴隶,无论是古代的还是现代的,根据他们的故事。这篇创造性的后记足以激励读者从中心主义的立场重新阅读腓利门。总的来说,B从一个边缘的角度重新讲述腓利门,说明了在基督教历史上听到被沉默者的声音和恢复被压迫者的力量的可能性。这本创新的书是强烈推荐给任何学生,外行,教会领袖,和神学家谁是致力于培育社会正义的基督教美德通过解释圣经文本的其他方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
129
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信