Business strategy and classification shifting: Indian evidence

IF 3.2 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Mani Bansal, H. Bashir
{"title":"Business strategy and classification shifting: Indian evidence","authors":"Mani Bansal, H. Bashir","doi":"10.1108/jaee-03-2021-0099","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThis study aims to investigate the impact of business strategy on the classification shifting practices of Indian firms.Design/methodology/approachThe study considered cost leadership and differentiation strategy. Two forms of classification shifting, namely, expense misclassification and revenue misclassification have been examined in this study. Panel data regression models are used to analyze the data for this study.FindingsThe results show that managers of cost leadership strategy firms are more likely to be engaged in expense misclassification, whereas firms following differentiation strategy are likely to be engaged in revenue misclassification. Subsequent tests of this study suggest that firms following a hybrid strategy (mix of cost leadership and differentiation) prefer revenue misclassification over expense misclassification for reporting inflated operating performance. These results imply that firms prefer the shifting tool based on the ease and need of each shifting strategy. These results are consistent with several robustness measures.Practical implicationsThe results suggest that investors should understand business strategy before developing insights about the accounting quality of firms. Investors should conduct a comprehensive review of income statement items before using items for portfolio evaluation.Originality/valueTo the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first study to examine the association between business strategy and classification shifting.","PeriodicalId":45702,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jaee-03-2021-0099","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

PurposeThis study aims to investigate the impact of business strategy on the classification shifting practices of Indian firms.Design/methodology/approachThe study considered cost leadership and differentiation strategy. Two forms of classification shifting, namely, expense misclassification and revenue misclassification have been examined in this study. Panel data regression models are used to analyze the data for this study.FindingsThe results show that managers of cost leadership strategy firms are more likely to be engaged in expense misclassification, whereas firms following differentiation strategy are likely to be engaged in revenue misclassification. Subsequent tests of this study suggest that firms following a hybrid strategy (mix of cost leadership and differentiation) prefer revenue misclassification over expense misclassification for reporting inflated operating performance. These results imply that firms prefer the shifting tool based on the ease and need of each shifting strategy. These results are consistent with several robustness measures.Practical implicationsThe results suggest that investors should understand business strategy before developing insights about the accounting quality of firms. Investors should conduct a comprehensive review of income statement items before using items for portfolio evaluation.Originality/valueTo the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first study to examine the association between business strategy and classification shifting.
商业战略和分类转变:印度证据
本研究旨在探讨商业策略对印度企业分类转移行为的影响。该研究考虑了成本领先和差异化战略。本研究考察了两种类型的分类转移,即费用误分类和收入误分类。本研究采用面板数据回归模型对数据进行分析。研究结果表明,成本领先战略企业的管理者更容易出现费用分类错误,而差异化战略企业的管理者更容易出现收入分类错误。本研究的后续测试表明,采用混合战略(成本领先和差异化的混合)的公司在报告夸大的经营业绩时更倾向于收入错误分类,而不是费用错误分类。这些结果表明,企业更倾向于基于每个转移策略的易用性和必要性的转移工具。这些结果与几个稳健性措施一致。实际意义研究结果表明,投资者在了解企业会计质量之前,应该先了解企业战略。在使用项目进行投资组合评估之前,投资者应该对损益表的项目进行全面的审查。原创性/价值据作者所知,这是第一个研究商业战略和分类转换之间关系的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
13.00%
发文量
38
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信