Rhetorical Naturalisation in the History of Philology: August Schleicher, Friedrich Max Müller and Their Critics

IF 0.1 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Angus Nicholls
{"title":"Rhetorical Naturalisation in the History of Philology: August Schleicher, Friedrich Max Müller and Their Critics","authors":"Angus Nicholls","doi":"10.1515/anger-2019-0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An intellectual history of the humanities can only fulfil its true critical purpose if, in examining debates from the past, it can say something important about the present. This essay examines an episode in the history of nineteenth-century philology – in German: Sprachwissenschaft, or what Friedrich Max Müller termed ‘The Science of Language’ – an episode that appeared to reach its resolution towards the end of that century, but which still contains implications that are of relevance today. The decisive issue in this debate is whether philology should be regarded as a natural science that proceeds according to empirically verifiable laws. Two of the key actors in this debate – August Schleicher (1821–1861) in Germany and Friedrich Max Müller (1823–1900) in Britain – sought to mobilise their own versions of Darwinian natural selection to claim that something like a ‘Science of Language’ can be formulated in a way analogous to evolutionary biology.1","PeriodicalId":40371,"journal":{"name":"Angermion-Yearbook for Anglo-German Literary Criticism Intellectual History and Cultural Transfers-Jahrbuch fuer Britisch-Deutsche Kulturbeziehungen","volume":"12 1","pages":"114 - 87"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1515/anger-2019-0005","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Angermion-Yearbook for Anglo-German Literary Criticism Intellectual History and Cultural Transfers-Jahrbuch fuer Britisch-Deutsche Kulturbeziehungen","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/anger-2019-0005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

An intellectual history of the humanities can only fulfil its true critical purpose if, in examining debates from the past, it can say something important about the present. This essay examines an episode in the history of nineteenth-century philology – in German: Sprachwissenschaft, or what Friedrich Max Müller termed ‘The Science of Language’ – an episode that appeared to reach its resolution towards the end of that century, but which still contains implications that are of relevance today. The decisive issue in this debate is whether philology should be regarded as a natural science that proceeds according to empirically verifiable laws. Two of the key actors in this debate – August Schleicher (1821–1861) in Germany and Friedrich Max Müller (1823–1900) in Britain – sought to mobilise their own versions of Darwinian natural selection to claim that something like a ‘Science of Language’ can be formulated in a way analogous to evolutionary biology.1
语言学史上的修辞归化:奥古斯特·施莱歇尔、弗里德里希·马克斯·迈勒及其批评者
人文学科的知识史只有在审视过去的辩论时,能够说出一些关于现在的重要内容,才能实现其真正的批判目的。这篇文章探讨了19世纪语文学史上的一个插曲——德语:Sprachwisenschaft,或弗里德里希·马克斯·穆勒所说的“语言科学”——这一插曲似乎在那个世纪末达到了顶峰,但它仍然包含着今天意义重大的含义。这场辩论的决定性问题是,语文学是否应该被视为一门根据经验可验证的规律进行的自然科学。这场辩论中的两位关键人物——德国的August Schleicher(1821–1861)和英国的Friedrich Max Müller(1823–1900)——试图动员他们自己版本的达尔文自然选择,声称类似“语言科学”的东西可以用类似进化生物学的方式来表述。1
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书