Art and logic: Godard’s Alphaville as philosophy

A. Jones
{"title":"Art and logic: Godard’s Alphaville as philosophy","authors":"A. Jones","doi":"10.1080/14715880.2016.1262119","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Jean-Luc Godard’s Alphaville: une étrange aventure de Lemmy Caution (1965) constitutes a strikingly brilliant mise en scène of strife between humans and logic. Led by a supercomputer and its scientist-creator, this technocratic city annihilates emotive human creativity. I argue that this dystopian science fiction film is philosophy, precisely because it engages a problem that philosophers also address, namely humanity’s relationship to art and logic. I present this film as an example in defense of the ‘bold thesis’ for film as philosophy developed by Paisley Livingston (2006). Though Livingston argues against this thesis, Aaron Smuts (2009) provides a valiant defense, to which Livingston (2009) responds, stating that only a more relevant example is missing. Supplying this example is the precise intention of this article. To do so, I begin with a discussion of Nietzsche’s The Birth of Tragedy ([1872] 1967), to provide a legitimate philosophical background from which to show how Alphaville not only serves as a thought experiment of prior established philosophy, but also builds upon those ideas to create its own philosophical contribution.","PeriodicalId":51945,"journal":{"name":"Studies in French Cinema","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14715880.2016.1262119","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in French Cinema","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14715880.2016.1262119","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Jean-Luc Godard’s Alphaville: une étrange aventure de Lemmy Caution (1965) constitutes a strikingly brilliant mise en scène of strife between humans and logic. Led by a supercomputer and its scientist-creator, this technocratic city annihilates emotive human creativity. I argue that this dystopian science fiction film is philosophy, precisely because it engages a problem that philosophers also address, namely humanity’s relationship to art and logic. I present this film as an example in defense of the ‘bold thesis’ for film as philosophy developed by Paisley Livingston (2006). Though Livingston argues against this thesis, Aaron Smuts (2009) provides a valiant defense, to which Livingston (2009) responds, stating that only a more relevant example is missing. Supplying this example is the precise intention of this article. To do so, I begin with a discussion of Nietzsche’s The Birth of Tragedy ([1872] 1967), to provide a legitimate philosophical background from which to show how Alphaville not only serves as a thought experiment of prior established philosophy, but also builds upon those ideas to create its own philosophical contribution.
艺术与逻辑:戈达尔的阿尔法维尔哲学
摘要让-吕克·戈达尔的阿尔法城:一个etrange马达加斯加de Lemmy谨慎(1965)之间的冲突构成了非常辉煌的舞台演出人类和逻辑。在一台超级计算机和它的科学家创造者的领导下,这个技术统治的城市消灭了人类的情感创造力。我认为这部反乌托邦的科幻电影是哲学,正是因为它涉及了哲学家们也在解决的问题,即人类与艺术和逻辑的关系。我以这部电影为例,为佩斯利·利文斯顿(Paisley Livingston, 2006)提出的电影哲学“大胆命题”辩护。尽管Livingston反对这一论点,Aaron Smuts(2009)提供了一个勇敢的辩护,Livingston(2009)回应说,只有一个更相关的例子是缺失的。提供这个示例正是本文的目的。为此,我首先讨论尼采的《悲剧的诞生》([1872]1967),以提供一个合理的哲学背景,从中展示Alphaville如何不仅作为先前建立的哲学的思想实验,而且还建立在这些思想之上,以创造自己的哲学贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Studies in French Cinema
Studies in French Cinema FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信