Reviving financial markets – a critical assessment of the single resolution mechanism

IF 1.4 Q3 ECONOMICS
Mariana Mortágua, Izaura Solipa
{"title":"Reviving financial markets – a critical assessment of the single resolution mechanism","authors":"Mariana Mortágua, Izaura Solipa","doi":"10.1080/02692171.2022.2093339","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The creation of the Banking Union, set to be an integrated financial framework for the Eurozone, should be better understood as part of a larger process of governing through financial markets, where policy-makers resort to market-based instruments and policies for governance purposes, thus forming an alignment with the interests of financial elites. This paper assesses the Single Resolution Mechanism and highlights overlooked aspects of its design and decision-making process that are actively strengthening and further integrating market-based finance in the European banking system. The resolution framework and its underlying conditionalities imposed by the limited public intervention toolkit and the European State Aid regime are promoting banking capital concentration and the marketization of more traditional banking systems. Meanwhile, the discretionary decisions imposed by the European technocratic body reinforces the integration agenda, with often detrimental effects for the member states of the Southern Periphery. While the Banking Union has the overall goal of financial stability and increased convergence between member states, the outcomes of the Single Resolution Mechanism point to an increase in market-based finance and riskier business models at the expense of smaller and more traditional banking systems, fostering too-big-to-fail institutions and further deepening the already rooted intra-euro divergences.","PeriodicalId":51618,"journal":{"name":"International Review of Applied Economics","volume":"36 1","pages":"403 - 423"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Review of Applied Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02692171.2022.2093339","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT The creation of the Banking Union, set to be an integrated financial framework for the Eurozone, should be better understood as part of a larger process of governing through financial markets, where policy-makers resort to market-based instruments and policies for governance purposes, thus forming an alignment with the interests of financial elites. This paper assesses the Single Resolution Mechanism and highlights overlooked aspects of its design and decision-making process that are actively strengthening and further integrating market-based finance in the European banking system. The resolution framework and its underlying conditionalities imposed by the limited public intervention toolkit and the European State Aid regime are promoting banking capital concentration and the marketization of more traditional banking systems. Meanwhile, the discretionary decisions imposed by the European technocratic body reinforces the integration agenda, with often detrimental effects for the member states of the Southern Periphery. While the Banking Union has the overall goal of financial stability and increased convergence between member states, the outcomes of the Single Resolution Mechanism point to an increase in market-based finance and riskier business models at the expense of smaller and more traditional banking systems, fostering too-big-to-fail institutions and further deepening the already rooted intra-euro divergences.
复兴金融市场——对单一处置机制的批判性评估
银行业联盟的建立将成为欧元区的综合金融框架,应该更好地理解为通过金融市场进行治理的更大过程的一部分,在这个过程中,政策制定者采用基于市场的工具和政策来实现治理目的,从而与金融精英的利益形成一致。本文评估了单一决议机制,并强调了其设计和决策过程中被忽视的方面,这些方面正在积极加强和进一步整合欧洲银行体系中的市场金融。有限的公共干预工具和欧洲国家援助制度所强加的决议框架及其基本条件正在促进银行资本集中和更传统的银行体系的市场化。与此同时,欧洲技术官僚机构强加的自由裁量决定强化了一体化议程,往往对南部外围成员国产生不利影响。尽管银行业联盟的总体目标是实现金融稳定,并加强成员国之间的趋同,但单一处置机制的结果表明,以较小和更传统的银行体系为代价,市场金融和风险更高的商业模式将会增加,催生“大而不能倒”的机构,并进一步加深本已根深蒂固的欧元区内部分歧。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
4.50%
发文量
37
期刊介绍: International Review of Applied Economics is devoted to the practical applications of economic ideas. Applied economics is widely interpreted to embrace empirical work and the application of economics to the evaluation and development of economic policies. The interaction between empirical work and economic policy is an important feature of the journal. The Journal is peer reviewed and international in scope. Articles that draw lessons from the experience of one country for the benefit of others, or that seek to make cross-country comparisons are particularly welcomed. Contributions which discuss policy issues from theoretical positions neglected in other journals are also encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信