Diversity of ground-dwelling ants in sugarcane plantations under different management systems

IF 1 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q4 ECOLOGY
D. R. Souza-Campana, Rogério R. Silva, O. Fernandes, Bianca Sayuri Futikami, O. Bueno, Luan Alberto Odorizzi Santos, M. Morini
{"title":"Diversity of ground-dwelling ants in sugarcane plantations under different management systems","authors":"D. R. Souza-Campana, Rogério R. Silva, O. Fernandes, Bianca Sayuri Futikami, O. Bueno, Luan Alberto Odorizzi Santos, M. Morini","doi":"10.1017/s0266467421000481","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n In this study, we compared the richness of ground-dwelling ants among three different sugarcane management systems (with the application of the insecticide fipronil and the addition of vinasse; with fipronil and no vinasse; and with vinasse and no fipronil, i.e., an organic production system) to evaluate whether the feeding/foraging types vary according to the management system. We tested the hypothesis that organic management increases species diversity because there is no use of chemical inputs. Estimated species richness was significantly higher in the organic management system than in the systems that used fipronil with vinasse. Generalists species were prevalent in all sugarcane fields, regardless of the production system, whereas predatory and fungivorous species were infrequent. However, the organically managed field had many predatory species. Our results suggest that fipronil with vinasse in sugarcane cultivation alters the ant community, possibly disrupting the functions performed by the edaphic fauna, such as control of arthropod crop pests, due to reduced predator species richness.","PeriodicalId":49968,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Tropical Ecology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Tropical Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0266467421000481","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this study, we compared the richness of ground-dwelling ants among three different sugarcane management systems (with the application of the insecticide fipronil and the addition of vinasse; with fipronil and no vinasse; and with vinasse and no fipronil, i.e., an organic production system) to evaluate whether the feeding/foraging types vary according to the management system. We tested the hypothesis that organic management increases species diversity because there is no use of chemical inputs. Estimated species richness was significantly higher in the organic management system than in the systems that used fipronil with vinasse. Generalists species were prevalent in all sugarcane fields, regardless of the production system, whereas predatory and fungivorous species were infrequent. However, the organically managed field had many predatory species. Our results suggest that fipronil with vinasse in sugarcane cultivation alters the ant community, possibly disrupting the functions performed by the edaphic fauna, such as control of arthropod crop pests, due to reduced predator species richness.
不同管理制度下甘蔗种植园地栖蚂蚁的多样性
在本研究中,我们比较了三种不同甘蔗管理制度(使用杀虫剂氟虫腈和添加酒糟;有氟虫腈,没有酒液;用酒糟和不含氟虫腈(即有机生产系统)来评估饲养/觅食类型是否因管理系统而异。我们测试了有机管理增加物种多样性的假设,因为不使用化学投入。有机管理系统中物种丰富度的估计值显著高于氟虫腈与酒液混合使用的系统。在所有甘蔗田中,不论生产制度如何,通用型品种普遍存在,而食用型和食用型品种少见。然而,有机管理的农田有许多掠食性物种。本研究结果表明,氟虫腈与酒糟在甘蔗种植中改变了蚂蚁群落,可能由于减少了捕食者物种丰富度而破坏了土壤动物的功能,如控制节肢动物作物害虫。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Tropical Ecology
Journal of Tropical Ecology 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
审稿时长
18-36 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Tropical Ecology aims to address topics of general relevance and significance to tropical ecology. This includes sub-disciplines of ecology, such as conservation biology, evolutionary ecology, marine ecology, microbial ecology, molecular ecology, quantitative ecology, etc. Studies in the field of tropical medicine, specifically where it involves ecological surroundings (e.g., zoonotic or vector-borne disease ecology), are also suitable. We also welcome methods papers, provided that the techniques are well-described and are of broad general utility. Please keep in mind that studies focused on specific geographic regions or on particular taxa will be better suited to more specialist journals. In order to help the editors make their decision, in your cover letter please address the specific hypothesis your study addresses, and how the results will interest the broad field of tropical ecology. While we will consider purely descriptive studies of outstanding general interest, the case for them should be made in the cover letter.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信