Good Work is Good for Health: The Societal and Individual Perspective

C. Holmes, K. Walker-Bone
{"title":"Good Work is Good for Health: The Societal and Individual Perspective","authors":"C. Holmes, K. Walker-Bone","doi":"10.4172/2471-9846.1000189","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Neither public health nor traditional healthcare have generally concerned themselves with employment participation. Most of the outcomes we measure are health-related and in practice we rarely take note of the occupation of our patients or populations or consider the impact of our healthcare on their ability to work. \nMethods: We report the results of a study of current clinical practice involving patients receiving outpatient care for chronic long-term conditions. \nResults: Healthcare workers do not take their opportunities to discuss work participation with their patients. \nConclusion: Work participation needs more emphasis by healthcare commissioners and providers. The optimal way to achieve this would be for work participation to become a health outcome. Prioritisation of work would lead to important improvements in the health of individuals and societies.","PeriodicalId":92236,"journal":{"name":"Journal of community & public health nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4172/2471-9846.1000189","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of community & public health nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2471-9846.1000189","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Neither public health nor traditional healthcare have generally concerned themselves with employment participation. Most of the outcomes we measure are health-related and in practice we rarely take note of the occupation of our patients or populations or consider the impact of our healthcare on their ability to work. Methods: We report the results of a study of current clinical practice involving patients receiving outpatient care for chronic long-term conditions. Results: Healthcare workers do not take their opportunities to discuss work participation with their patients. Conclusion: Work participation needs more emphasis by healthcare commissioners and providers. The optimal way to achieve this would be for work participation to become a health outcome. Prioritisation of work would lead to important improvements in the health of individuals and societies.
好的工作有益于健康:社会和个人的观点
背景:公共卫生和传统卫生保健一般都不关心就业参与。我们衡量的大多数结果都是与健康相关的,在实践中,我们很少注意到患者或人群的职业,也很少考虑我们的医疗保健对他们工作能力的影响。方法:我们报告了目前临床实践的研究结果,涉及接受门诊治疗的慢性长期疾病患者。结果:医护人员不利用他们的机会与他们的病人讨论工作参与。结论:卫生保健专员和医务人员应更加重视工作参与。实现这一目标的最佳途径是使工作参与成为一种健康成果。确定工作的优先次序将大大改善个人和社会的健康状况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信