An investigation into the knowledge–sharing practices for innovation in higher education institutions of developing countries

IF 0.2 Q4 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY
Alfred H. Mazorodze, Peter L. Mkhize
{"title":"An investigation into the knowledge–sharing practices for innovation in higher education institutions of developing countries","authors":"Alfred H. Mazorodze, Peter L. Mkhize","doi":"10.4102/td.v18i1.1230","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"institutions are expected to be at the cutting edge of such innovation. 1 Research-intensive institutions are ranked according to their core missions of teaching, research and the international The adoption of knowledge-sharing practices in higher education result in improved decision-making, improved access to information and increased collaboration. A knowledge-sharing culture enables the free exchange of knowledge amongst academics and this drives institutions towards innovation. This study examines the extent to which knowledge-sharing practices have been adopted at higher education institutions (HEIs) of developing countries. The article reports on an inquiry conducted at HEIs in Zimbabwe to determine the knowledge-sharing practices in place. A survey was used to collect quantitative data from 240 purposefully selected academics at the HEIs. The data were analysed using descriptive statistics. This study established that HEIs have not fully implemented the knowledge-sharing practices. Empirical evidence confirms that attendance of conferences is important for knowledge sharing where 43 % of the participants approved the proposition. Coaching and mentoring improve academic skills such that 21.7 % of the participants approved the premise. Subscribing to international journals increases the visibility of scientific research work and only 18.3 % of the participants confirmed that their institutions subscribe to internationally recognised journals. Surprisingly, 60 % of the participants confirmed that their institutions do not offer knowledge-sharing workshops. Unremarkably, 23.3 % of the participants confirmed that their institutions do not have a knowledge-sharing culture. Transdisciplinarity Contribution: Higher education institutions have not fully exploited the knowledge-sharing practices that could make them more innovative. The institutions are still at the trial stage of adopting knowledge-sharing practices. This study therefore recommends the creation of communities of practice (COPs) specifically for knowledge sharing.","PeriodicalId":43643,"journal":{"name":"TD-The Journal for Transdisciplinary Research in Southern Africa","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"TD-The Journal for Transdisciplinary Research in Southern Africa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/td.v18i1.1230","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

institutions are expected to be at the cutting edge of such innovation. 1 Research-intensive institutions are ranked according to their core missions of teaching, research and the international The adoption of knowledge-sharing practices in higher education result in improved decision-making, improved access to information and increased collaboration. A knowledge-sharing culture enables the free exchange of knowledge amongst academics and this drives institutions towards innovation. This study examines the extent to which knowledge-sharing practices have been adopted at higher education institutions (HEIs) of developing countries. The article reports on an inquiry conducted at HEIs in Zimbabwe to determine the knowledge-sharing practices in place. A survey was used to collect quantitative data from 240 purposefully selected academics at the HEIs. The data were analysed using descriptive statistics. This study established that HEIs have not fully implemented the knowledge-sharing practices. Empirical evidence confirms that attendance of conferences is important for knowledge sharing where 43 % of the participants approved the proposition. Coaching and mentoring improve academic skills such that 21.7 % of the participants approved the premise. Subscribing to international journals increases the visibility of scientific research work and only 18.3 % of the participants confirmed that their institutions subscribe to internationally recognised journals. Surprisingly, 60 % of the participants confirmed that their institutions do not offer knowledge-sharing workshops. Unremarkably, 23.3 % of the participants confirmed that their institutions do not have a knowledge-sharing culture. Transdisciplinarity Contribution: Higher education institutions have not fully exploited the knowledge-sharing practices that could make them more innovative. The institutions are still at the trial stage of adopting knowledge-sharing practices. This study therefore recommends the creation of communities of practice (COPs) specifically for knowledge sharing.
发展中国家高等教育机构创新的知识共享实践调查
预计各机构将处于此类创新的前沿。1研究密集型机构根据其教学、研究和国际核心使命进行排名。在高等教育中采用知识共享做法可以改善决策,改善信息获取和加强合作。知识共享文化使学术界能够自由交流知识,从而推动机构创新。本研究考察了发展中国家高等教育机构采用知识共享做法的程度。这篇文章报道了津巴布韦高等教育机构为确定现有的知识共享做法而进行的调查。一项调查用于收集来自高等教育机构240名有意选择的学者的定量数据。使用描述性统计对数据进行了分析。这项研究表明,高等教育机构没有充分实施知识共享实践。经验证据证实,出席会议对知识共享很重要,43%的参与者赞成这一提议。辅导和指导可以提高学术技能,因此21.7%的参与者同意这一前提。订阅国际期刊可以提高科研工作的知名度,只有18.3%的参与者确认他们的机构订阅了国际公认的期刊。令人惊讶的是,60%的参与者确认他们的机构不提供知识共享研讨会。毫无疑问,23.3%的参与者确认他们的机构没有知识共享文化。跨学科贡献:高等教育机构没有充分利用可以使其更具创新性的知识共享做法。这些机构仍处于采用知识共享做法的试验阶段。因此,本研究建议建立专门用于知识共享的实践社区。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
审稿时长
27 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信