Legal Realism and ‘Working’ Rules

IF 0.4 Q3 LAW

Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence Pub Date : 2022-07-05 DOI:10.1017/cjlj.2022.14

David Frydrych

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract The American Legal Realists offered several hypotheses about alternative drivers of official decision-making (i.e., considerations other than the rules on the books). This article identifies a tension between two of those hypotheses: the ‘extra-legal’ factors and ‘working’ rules. This tension gets exacerbated in Frederick Schauer’s account of Legal Realism, one which places his Dislocated Determinacy thesis—about working rules constituting an additional ground for the existence of ‘easy’ cases and determinacy across a legal system—into doubt.

查看原文本刊更多论文

法律现实主义和“工作”规则

摘要美国法律现实主义者提出了关于官方决策的替代驱动因素的几个假设（即，除了书本上的规则之外的考虑因素）。这篇文章指出了其中两个假设之间的紧张关系：“法外”因素和“工作”规则。弗雷德里克·绍尔（Frederick Schauer。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence LAW-

CiteScore

1.10

自引率

16.70%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence serves as a forum for special and general jurisprudence and legal philosophy. It publishes articles that address the nature of law, that engage in philosophical analysis or criticism of legal doctrine, that examine the form and nature of legal or judicial reasoning, that investigate issues concerning the ethical aspects of legal practice, and that study (from a philosophical perspective) concrete legal issues facing contemporary society. The journal does not use case notes, nor does it publish articles focussing on issues particular to the laws of a single nation. The Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence is published on behalf of the Faculty of Law, Western University.