Characteristics of Physicians Participating in Medicare's Oncology Care Model Bundled Payment Program.

Q1 Nursing
Journal of Oncology Practice Pub Date : 2019-10-01 Epub Date: 2019-08-08 DOI:10.1200/JOP.19.00047
Ravi B Parikh, Justin E Bekelman, Qian Huang, Joseph R Martinez, Ezekiel J Emanuel, Amol S Navathe
{"title":"Characteristics of Physicians Participating in Medicare's Oncology Care Model Bundled Payment Program.","authors":"Ravi B Parikh, Justin E Bekelman, Qian Huang, Joseph R Martinez, Ezekiel J Emanuel, Amol S Navathe","doi":"10.1200/JOP.19.00047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The Oncology Care Model (OCM) is Medicare's first bundled payment program for patients with cancer. We examined baseline characteristics of OCM physician participants and markets with high OCM physician participation to inform generalizability and complement the ongoing practice-level evaluation of the OCM.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this cross-sectional study, we identified characteristics of US medical oncologists practicing in 2016, using a national telephone-verified physician database. We linked these data with Dartmouth Atlas and Medicare claims data from 2011 through 2016 to identify characteristics of markets with high OCM participation. We used logistic regression to examine relationships between market characteristics and OCM participation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 10,428 US medical oncologists, 2,605 (24.9%) were listed in an OCM practice. There were no differences in sex or medical training between OCM participants and nonparticipants, although OCM participants were slightly younger. OCM participants practiced in larger (median daily patient volume, 80 <i>v</i> 55 patients) and urban practices (95.2% <i>v</i> 90.7%) and were less likely to be part of a health system (41.0% <i>v</i> 60.4%) or solo practice (45.5% <i>v</i> 67.4%; all <i>P</i> < .001). Participation was higher in southern and mid-Atlantic markets. Markets with high OCM physician participation had higher specialist density, hospital care intensity, and acute care use at the end of life (all <i>P</i> < .001). Market-level penetration of Accountable Care Organizations (adjusted odds ratio, 4.65; 95% CI 3.31 to 6.56; <i>P</i> < .001) and Medicare Advantage (adjusted odds ratio 2.82; 95% CI, 1.97 to 4.06; <i>P</i> < .001) were associated with higher OCM participation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In the first description of oncologists participating in the OCM, we found differences in practice demographics, care intensity, and exposure to nontraditional payment models between OCM-participating and nonparticipating physicians. Such provider-level differences may not be captured in Medicare's practice-level analysis.</p>","PeriodicalId":54273,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Oncology Practice","volume":"1 1","pages":"e897-e905"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7846066/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Oncology Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/JOP.19.00047","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/8/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The Oncology Care Model (OCM) is Medicare's first bundled payment program for patients with cancer. We examined baseline characteristics of OCM physician participants and markets with high OCM physician participation to inform generalizability and complement the ongoing practice-level evaluation of the OCM.

Methods: In this cross-sectional study, we identified characteristics of US medical oncologists practicing in 2016, using a national telephone-verified physician database. We linked these data with Dartmouth Atlas and Medicare claims data from 2011 through 2016 to identify characteristics of markets with high OCM participation. We used logistic regression to examine relationships between market characteristics and OCM participation.

Results: Of 10,428 US medical oncologists, 2,605 (24.9%) were listed in an OCM practice. There were no differences in sex or medical training between OCM participants and nonparticipants, although OCM participants were slightly younger. OCM participants practiced in larger (median daily patient volume, 80 v 55 patients) and urban practices (95.2% v 90.7%) and were less likely to be part of a health system (41.0% v 60.4%) or solo practice (45.5% v 67.4%; all P < .001). Participation was higher in southern and mid-Atlantic markets. Markets with high OCM physician participation had higher specialist density, hospital care intensity, and acute care use at the end of life (all P < .001). Market-level penetration of Accountable Care Organizations (adjusted odds ratio, 4.65; 95% CI 3.31 to 6.56; P < .001) and Medicare Advantage (adjusted odds ratio 2.82; 95% CI, 1.97 to 4.06; P < .001) were associated with higher OCM participation.

Conclusion: In the first description of oncologists participating in the OCM, we found differences in practice demographics, care intensity, and exposure to nontraditional payment models between OCM-participating and nonparticipating physicians. Such provider-level differences may not be captured in Medicare's practice-level analysis.

参与医疗保险肿瘤护理模式捆绑支付计划的医生的特点。
目的肿瘤护理模式(OCM)是医疗保险为癌症患者提供的第一个捆绑支付计划。我们检查了OCM医生参与者和OCM医生参与度高的市场的基线特征,以告知可推广性,并补充正在进行的OCM实践水平评估。方法在这项横断面研究中,我们使用国家电话验证的医生数据库确定了2016年执业的美国医学肿瘤学家的特征。我们将这些数据与2011年至2016年的达特茅斯图谱和医疗保险索赔数据联系起来,以确定OCM参与率高的市场特征。我们使用逻辑回归来检验市场特征和OCM参与之间的关系。结果在10428名美国医学肿瘤学家中,2605名(24.9%)被列入OCM诊所。OCM参与者和非参与者在性别或医学训练方面没有差异,尽管OCM参与者略年轻。OCM参与者在较大的(中位每日患者量,80对55名患者)和城市实践(95.2%对90.7%)中实践,不太可能成为卫生系统的一部分(41.0%对60.4%)或单独实践(45.5%对67.4%;所有P<.001)。南部和中大西洋市场的参与率较高。具有高OCM医师参与度的市场具有更高的专科医生密度、医院护理强度,责任护理组织的市场水平渗透率(调整后的比值比,4.65;95%CI 3.31至6.56;P<.001)和医疗保险优势(调整后比值比,2.82;95%CI,1.97至4.06;P<.001)与更高的OCM参与率相关。结论在对参与OCM的肿瘤学家的首次描述中,我们发现参与OCM和未参与OCM医生在实践人口统计学、护理强度和非传统支付模式暴露方面存在差异。医疗保险的实践层面分析中可能无法捕捉到此类提供者层面的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Oncology Practice
Journal of Oncology Practice Nursing-Oncology (nursing)
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Journal of Oncology Practice (JOP) provides necessary information and insights to keep oncology practice current on changes and challenges inherent in delivering quality oncology care. All content dealing with understanding the provision of care—the mechanics of practice—is the purview of JOP. JOP also addresses an expressed need of practicing physicians to have compressed, expert opinion addressing common clinical problems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信