Private Law’s Estranged Bedfellows: Why Pashukanis Should Worry Contemporary Formalists

IF 0.4 Q3 LAW

Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence Pub Date : 2020-06-01 DOI:10.1017/cjlj.2020.4

Igor Shoikhedbrod

引用次数: 0

Abstract

The critique of bourgeois jurisprudence : : : must, above all, venture into enemy territory. It should not throw aside the generalisations and abstractions elaborated by bourgeois jurists, whose starting point was the needs of their class and of their times. Rather, by analysing these abstract categories, it should demonstrate their true significance and lay bare the historically limited nature of the legal form.1

查看原文本刊更多论文

私法的异化同床异梦：为什么帕舒卡尼斯应该让当代形式主义者感到担忧

对资产阶级法学的批判：首先，必须冒险进入敌人的领土。它不应该抛弃资产阶级法学家所阐述的概括和抽象，他们的出发点是阶级和时代的需要。相反，通过分析这些抽象的类别，它应该证明它们的真正意义，并揭示法律形式的历史局限性。1

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence LAW-

CiteScore

1.10

自引率

16.70%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence serves as a forum for special and general jurisprudence and legal philosophy. It publishes articles that address the nature of law, that engage in philosophical analysis or criticism of legal doctrine, that examine the form and nature of legal or judicial reasoning, that investigate issues concerning the ethical aspects of legal practice, and that study (from a philosophical perspective) concrete legal issues facing contemporary society. The journal does not use case notes, nor does it publish articles focussing on issues particular to the laws of a single nation. The Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence is published on behalf of the Faculty of Law, Western University.