Comparison Between Numerical Analysis and Actual Results for a Pull-Out Test

Q2 Engineering
J. Gontarz, J. Podgórski, J. Jonak, M. Kalita, M. Siegmund
{"title":"Comparison Between Numerical Analysis and Actual Results for a Pull-Out Test","authors":"J. Gontarz, J. Podgórski, J. Jonak, M. Kalita, M. Siegmund","doi":"10.24423/ENGTRANS.1005.20190815","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper describes a computer analysis of the pull-out test used to determine the force needed to pull out a fragment of rock and the shape of this broken fragment. The analyzed material is sandstone and porphyry. The analysis included a comparison of different methods of propagation of cracks in the Abaqus computer program using the Finite Element Method. The work also contains a description of laboratory tests and analytical considerations.","PeriodicalId":38552,"journal":{"name":"Engineering Transactions","volume":"67 1","pages":"311-331"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"16","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering Transactions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24423/ENGTRANS.1005.20190815","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

Abstract

The paper describes a computer analysis of the pull-out test used to determine the force needed to pull out a fragment of rock and the shape of this broken fragment. The analyzed material is sandstone and porphyry. The analysis included a comparison of different methods of propagation of cracks in the Abaqus computer program using the Finite Element Method. The work also contains a description of laboratory tests and analytical considerations.
拉拔试验数值分析与实际结果的比较
本文描述了一种用于确定拔出岩石碎片所需的力和破碎碎片形状的拔出试验的计算机分析。分析的材料为砂岩和斑岩。分析包括在Abaqus计算机程序中使用有限元法对裂纹扩展的不同方法进行比较。该工作还包括对实验室测试和分析考虑的说明。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Engineering Transactions
Engineering Transactions Engineering-Engineering (all)
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Engineering Transactions (formerly Rozprawy Inżynierskie) is a refereed international journal founded in 1952. The journal promotes research and practice in engineering science and provides a forum for interdisciplinary publications combining mechanics with: Material science, Mechatronics, Biomechanics and Biotechnologies, Environmental science, Photonics, Information technologies, Other engineering applications. The journal publishes original papers covering a broad area of research activities including: experimental and hybrid techniques, analytical and numerical approaches. Review articles and special issues are also welcome. Following long tradition, all articles are peer reviewed and our expert referees ensure that the papers accepted for publication comply with high scientific standards. Engineering Transactions is a quarterly journal intended to be interesting and useful for the researchers and practitioners in academic and industrial communities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信