Tensions in describing Muslim religious practices: Insights generated from an Islamic monotheist perspective

IF 2.4 Q1 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY
Fatima Hendricks, R. Galvaan, Shaykh Muhammad bin Yahya al-Ninowy
{"title":"Tensions in describing Muslim religious practices: Insights generated from an Islamic monotheist perspective","authors":"Fatima Hendricks, R. Galvaan, Shaykh Muhammad bin Yahya al-Ninowy","doi":"10.1080/14427591.2022.2132997","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT As forms of human occupation, religious practices have tended to be separated from spirituality in occupational science discussions. This paper describes the tensions we experienced in trying to situate a religious practice in Islam, namely salah (prayer), in relation to existing understandings of human occupation. We think through these tensions, drawing upon Islamic ontology and epistemology. Using a qualitative research design, we generated data using critical reflections by the first and third authors. Using their experience, and an Islamic ontology and epistemology, the co-authors analyzed and explicated the tensions experienced and identified during the academic project describing Muslim religious practices in occupational science. We use the embodiment and enactment of salah as our prominent illustrative example. The findings represent three tensions: Ontological differences through Islamic Monotheism; A fragmented and segregated view of Islam and Deen versus religion; and Tackling the dichotomy between religious and non-religious. We discuss how Islamic epistemology provides a harmonious way of capturing the fullness of religious practices such as salah. We suggest that this demonstrates a decolonial effort at focusing on viewing religious practices as occupations.","PeriodicalId":51542,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Occupational Science","volume":"30 1","pages":"673 - 683"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Occupational Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2022.2132997","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

ABSTRACT As forms of human occupation, religious practices have tended to be separated from spirituality in occupational science discussions. This paper describes the tensions we experienced in trying to situate a religious practice in Islam, namely salah (prayer), in relation to existing understandings of human occupation. We think through these tensions, drawing upon Islamic ontology and epistemology. Using a qualitative research design, we generated data using critical reflections by the first and third authors. Using their experience, and an Islamic ontology and epistemology, the co-authors analyzed and explicated the tensions experienced and identified during the academic project describing Muslim religious practices in occupational science. We use the embodiment and enactment of salah as our prominent illustrative example. The findings represent three tensions: Ontological differences through Islamic Monotheism; A fragmented and segregated view of Islam and Deen versus religion; and Tackling the dichotomy between religious and non-religious. We discuss how Islamic epistemology provides a harmonious way of capturing the fullness of religious practices such as salah. We suggest that this demonstrates a decolonial effort at focusing on viewing religious practices as occupations.
描述穆斯林宗教习俗的紧张:从伊斯兰一神论的角度产生的见解
摘要宗教实践作为人类职业的一种形式,在职业科学的讨论中往往与精神分离。本文描述了我们在试图将伊斯兰教中的一种宗教实践,即祈祷,与对人类职业的现有理解联系起来时所经历的紧张关系。我们利用伊斯兰本体论和认识论来思考这些紧张关系。使用定性研究设计,我们使用第一和第三作者的批判性反思生成数据。利用他们的经验,以及伊斯兰本体论和认识论,合著者分析和阐述了在职业科学中描述穆斯林宗教实践的学术项目中所经历和确定的紧张关系。我们用萨拉赫的具体化和设定作为我们突出的例证。这些发现代表了三种紧张关系:伊斯兰一神论的本体论差异;对伊斯兰教和迪恩与宗教的分裂和隔离的看法;以及处理宗教和非宗教之间的二分法。我们讨论了伊斯兰认识论如何提供一种和谐的方式来捕捉宗教实践的完整性,如萨拉赫。我们认为,这表明了一种非殖民化的努力,专注于将宗教实践视为职业。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Occupational Science
Journal of Occupational Science SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
41.70%
发文量
46
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信