Dialektika Elite Pesantren dalam Pengembangan Kurikulum Lokal Madrasah di Pesantren Nurul Islam 1 dan Al-Qodiri 1 Jember

Imron Fauzi
{"title":"Dialektika Elite Pesantren dalam Pengembangan Kurikulum Lokal Madrasah di Pesantren Nurul Islam 1 dan Al-Qodiri 1 Jember","authors":"Imron Fauzi","doi":"10.21274/TAALUM.2019.7.1.73-100","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study examines the elite dialectics of Nurul Islam 1 and Al-Qodiri 1 Jember Islamic Boarding School (pesantren) in developing their local curriculum. This study uses qualitative method. A number of data are collected through interview, observation, and documentary techniques. In analyzing the data, researcher uses data reduction, data display, and then find a conclusion. The researcher uses  triangulation method in validating the data. The result of this study shows that the dialectics conducted by elites pesantren in developing local curriculum significantly developed through complementary dialogic way without changing national curriculum as well. The alternative ways in responding supervision and accreditation from the government, they made/served two forms of curriculum, namely national curriculum or government version curriculum and local curriculum or pesantren version curriculum. The dialectic inhibition factor is a guideline that still unclear, causes miscommunication in implementing it; local curriculum evaluates independently; and a complicated division of learning schedule, between activities in pesantren, curricular activities, and extracurricular activities at madrasah.","PeriodicalId":55777,"journal":{"name":"Taallum Jurnal Pendidikan Islam","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Taallum Jurnal Pendidikan Islam","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21274/TAALUM.2019.7.1.73-100","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examines the elite dialectics of Nurul Islam 1 and Al-Qodiri 1 Jember Islamic Boarding School (pesantren) in developing their local curriculum. This study uses qualitative method. A number of data are collected through interview, observation, and documentary techniques. In analyzing the data, researcher uses data reduction, data display, and then find a conclusion. The researcher uses  triangulation method in validating the data. The result of this study shows that the dialectics conducted by elites pesantren in developing local curriculum significantly developed through complementary dialogic way without changing national curriculum as well. The alternative ways in responding supervision and accreditation from the government, they made/served two forms of curriculum, namely national curriculum or government version curriculum and local curriculum or pesantren version curriculum. The dialectic inhibition factor is a guideline that still unclear, causes miscommunication in implementing it; local curriculum evaluates independently; and a complicated division of learning schedule, between activities in pesantren, curricular activities, and extracurricular activities at madrasah.
辩证法精英在Nurul Islam 1和Al Qodiri 1的地方Kurikulum宗教学校发展高级1月1日。
本研究考察了Nurul Islam 1和Al-Qodiri Jember伊斯兰寄宿学校(pesantren)在开发当地课程时的精英辩证法。本研究采用定性方法。通过访谈、观察和文献技术收集了大量数据。在分析数据时,研究者采用数据简化、数据显示,然后得出结论。研究者使用三角测量法对数据进行验证。研究结果表明,在不改变国家课程的情况下,精英代表在地方课程开发中的辩证法也通过互补的对话方式得到了显著发展。在应对政府监督和认证的方式上,他们制定/服务于两种课程形式,即国家课程或政府版课程和地方课程或学生版课程。辩证抑制因素是指导方针尚不明确,在执行中造成误解;本地课程独立评估;学习日程的划分也很复杂,在学校的活动,课程活动和伊斯兰学校的课外活动之间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
审稿时长
23 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信