Transitional care interventions to reduce readmission in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Min Liu , Yang Zhang , Dan-Dan Li , Jing Sun
{"title":"Transitional care interventions to reduce readmission in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials","authors":"Min Liu ,&nbsp;Yang Zhang ,&nbsp;Dan-Dan Li ,&nbsp;Jing Sun","doi":"10.1016/j.cnre.2017.06.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To objectively assess the effect of transitional care on readmission for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The PubMed, Science Direct, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, CNKI, and Wanfang databases were searched for relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published from January 1990 through April 2016. The quality of eligible studies was assessed by two investigators. The primary outcome assessed was readmission for COPD and all-cause readmission. The pooled effect sizes were expressed as the relative risk and standard mean difference with 95% confidence intervals. Heterogeneity among studies was assessed using the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (Version 5.1.0) and determined with an <em>I</em><sup>2</sup> statistic.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of seven RCTs that included 1879 participants who met the inclusion criteria were analyzed. The results of subgroup analysis showed significant differences in readmission for COPD at the 6 month and 18 month time points and all-cause readmission at the 18 month follow-up. Transitional care could reduce readmission for COPD at the 6 month [RR = 0.51, 95% CI (0.38,0.68), <em>P</em> &lt; 0.00001] and 18 month time points [RR = 0.56, 95% CI (0.45,0.69), <em>P</em> &lt; 0.00001, and also reduce all-cause readmission after 18 months [RR = 0.72, 95% CI (0.62,0.84), <em>P</em> &lt; 0.0001]. The reduction of all-cause readmission between the intervention and control groups in the 2nd year, however, was less than that in the 1st year.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Transitional care is beneficial to reducing readmission for patients with COPD. Duration of≥ 6 and ≤ 18 months are more effective, and the effect weakens over intervention time, especially after the end of intervention. Both durations point to the importance of ongoing intervention and reinforcement after the end of intervention.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":57172,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers of Nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.cnre.2017.06.004","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers of Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2095771817300361","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Objective

To objectively assess the effect of transitional care on readmission for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Methods

The PubMed, Science Direct, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, CNKI, and Wanfang databases were searched for relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published from January 1990 through April 2016. The quality of eligible studies was assessed by two investigators. The primary outcome assessed was readmission for COPD and all-cause readmission. The pooled effect sizes were expressed as the relative risk and standard mean difference with 95% confidence intervals. Heterogeneity among studies was assessed using the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (Version 5.1.0) and determined with an I2 statistic.

Results

A total of seven RCTs that included 1879 participants who met the inclusion criteria were analyzed. The results of subgroup analysis showed significant differences in readmission for COPD at the 6 month and 18 month time points and all-cause readmission at the 18 month follow-up. Transitional care could reduce readmission for COPD at the 6 month [RR = 0.51, 95% CI (0.38,0.68), P < 0.00001] and 18 month time points [RR = 0.56, 95% CI (0.45,0.69), P < 0.00001, and also reduce all-cause readmission after 18 months [RR = 0.72, 95% CI (0.62,0.84), P < 0.0001]. The reduction of all-cause readmission between the intervention and control groups in the 2nd year, however, was less than that in the 1st year.

Conclusions

Transitional care is beneficial to reducing readmission for patients with COPD. Duration of≥ 6 and ≤ 18 months are more effective, and the effect weakens over intervention time, especially after the end of intervention. Both durations point to the importance of ongoing intervention and reinforcement after the end of intervention.

减少慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者再入院的过渡性护理干预:随机对照试验的荟萃分析
目的客观评价过渡性护理对慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者再入院的影响。方法检索PubMed、Science Direct、Web of Science、Cochrane Library、中国知网(CNKI)和万方数据库,检索1990年1月至2016年4月发表的相关随机对照试验(rct)。合格研究的质量由两名研究者评估。评估的主要结局是COPD再入院和全因再入院。合并效应量表示为相对风险和95%置信区间的标准均值差。采用Cochrane干预措施系统评价手册(5.1.0版)评估研究间的异质性,并采用I2统计量确定。结果共纳入7项rct,共纳入1879名符合纳入标准的受试者。亚组分析结果显示,6个月和18个月时间点COPD再入院率和18个月随访时全因再入院率存在显著差异。过渡性护理可减少6个月时COPD的再入院率[RR = 0.51, 95% CI (0.38,0.68), P <0.00001]和18个月时间点[RR = 0.56, 95% CI (0.45,0.69), P <0.00001,也减少了18个月后的全因再入院[RR = 0.72, 95% CI (0.62,0.84), P <0.0001]。然而,干预组和对照组在第2年的全因再入院率的减少低于第1年。结论过渡护理有利于减少COPD患者再入院。持续时间≥6个月和≤18个月更有效,随着干预时间的延长,效果减弱,尤其是干预结束后。这两种持续时间都表明了持续干预和干预结束后加强的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
353
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信