Dosimetric Results for Adjuvant Proton Radiation Therapy of HPV-Associated Oropharynx Cancer

IF 2.1 Q3 ONCOLOGY
C. Wright, J. Baron, Daniel Y. Lee, Michele M. Kim, A. Barsky, B. Teo, J. Lukens, S. Swisher-McClure, A. Lin
{"title":"Dosimetric Results for Adjuvant Proton Radiation Therapy of HPV-Associated Oropharynx Cancer","authors":"C. Wright, J. Baron, Daniel Y. Lee, Michele M. Kim, A. Barsky, B. Teo, J. Lukens, S. Swisher-McClure, A. Lin","doi":"10.14338/IJPT-D-21-00018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose One significant advantage of proton therapy is its ability to improve normal tissue sparing and toxicity mitigation, which is relevant in the treatment of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC). Here, we report our institutional experience and dosimetric results with adjuvant proton radiation therapy (PRT) versus intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for Human Papilloma Virus (HPV)-associated OPSCC. Materials and Methods This was a retrospective, single institutional study of all patients treated with adjuvant PRT for HPV-associated OPSCC from 2015 to 2019. Each patient had a treatment-approved equivalent IMRT plan to serve as a reference. Endpoints included dosimetric outcomes to the organs at risk (OARs), local regional control (LRC), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Descriptive statistics, a 2-tailed paired t test for dosimetric comparisons, and the Kaplan-Meier method for disease outcomes were used. Results Fifty-three patients were identified. Doses delivered to OARs compared favorably for PRT versus IMRT, particularly for the pharyngeal constrictors, esophagus, larynx, oral cavity, and submandibular and parotid glands. The achieved normal tissue sparing did not negatively impact disease outcomes, with 2-year LRC, PFS, and OS of 97.0%, 90.3%, and 97.5%, respectively. Conclusion Our study suggests that meaningful normal tissue sparing in the postoperative setting is achievable with PRT, without impacting disease outcomes.","PeriodicalId":36923,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Particle Therapy","volume":"8 1","pages":"47 - 54"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Particle Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14338/IJPT-D-21-00018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose One significant advantage of proton therapy is its ability to improve normal tissue sparing and toxicity mitigation, which is relevant in the treatment of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC). Here, we report our institutional experience and dosimetric results with adjuvant proton radiation therapy (PRT) versus intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for Human Papilloma Virus (HPV)-associated OPSCC. Materials and Methods This was a retrospective, single institutional study of all patients treated with adjuvant PRT for HPV-associated OPSCC from 2015 to 2019. Each patient had a treatment-approved equivalent IMRT plan to serve as a reference. Endpoints included dosimetric outcomes to the organs at risk (OARs), local regional control (LRC), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Descriptive statistics, a 2-tailed paired t test for dosimetric comparisons, and the Kaplan-Meier method for disease outcomes were used. Results Fifty-three patients were identified. Doses delivered to OARs compared favorably for PRT versus IMRT, particularly for the pharyngeal constrictors, esophagus, larynx, oral cavity, and submandibular and parotid glands. The achieved normal tissue sparing did not negatively impact disease outcomes, with 2-year LRC, PFS, and OS of 97.0%, 90.3%, and 97.5%, respectively. Conclusion Our study suggests that meaningful normal tissue sparing in the postoperative setting is achievable with PRT, without impacting disease outcomes.
辅助质子放射治疗HPV-相关口咽癌症的剂量测定结果
目的质子治疗的一个显著优势是其改善正常组织保留和毒性缓解的能力,这与口咽鳞状细胞癌(OPSCC)的治疗有关。在这里,我们报告了辅助质子放射治疗(PRT)与调强放疗(IMRT)治疗人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)相关OPSCC的机构经验和剂量学结果。材料和方法这是一项回顾性的、单一机构的研究,研究对象是2015年至2019年接受辅助PRT治疗hpv相关OPSCC的所有患者。每个患者都有一个治疗批准的等效IMRT计划作为参考。终点包括危险器官(OARs)的剂量学结果、局部区域控制(LRC)、无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)。剂量比较采用描述性统计、双尾配对t检验,疾病结局采用Kaplan-Meier法。结果共检出53例。与IMRT相比,PRT对OARs的剂量更有利,特别是对咽收缩器、食道、喉部、口腔、下颌下腺和腮腺。获得的正常组织保留对疾病结局没有负面影响,2年LRC、PFS和OS分别为97.0%、90.3%和97.5%。结论:我们的研究表明,在不影响疾病预后的情况下,PRT可以实现术后有意义的正常组织保留。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Particle Therapy
International Journal of Particle Therapy Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
5.90%
发文量
23
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信