The novel minimally invasive mechano-chemical technique of the saphenous vein ablation. Our center experience: results of 24 months follow-up

IF 0.4 Q4 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
M. Iłżecki, P. Terlecki, S. Przywara, J. Iłżecka, T. Zubilewicz
{"title":"The novel minimally invasive mechano-chemical technique of the saphenous vein ablation. Our center experience: results of 24 months follow-up","authors":"M. Iłżecki, P. Terlecki, S. Przywara, J. Iłżecka, T. Zubilewicz","doi":"10.5603/aa.2019.0008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy of the endovascular ablation method of GSV/ /SSV superficial venous insufficiency using Flebogrif® catheter, the safety of the method, expressed in number and quality of observed complications in 24-month observation. Material and methods: Initially, the observed group included 200 patients undergoing ablation of insufficient GSV/SSV. During 24 months of observation, this number decreased to 158, which seems to be a natural process. All patients signed the informed consent form approved by the Bioethics Committee of the Medical University of Lublin. Based on clinical evaluation, including ultrasound assessment, 200 patients, including 170 women and 30 men, were admitted to the study using the adopted criteria of inclusion/exclusion. In the studied group of patients, 172 great saphenous veins (GSV) and 28 short saphenous veins (SSV) were ablated. The treated inefficient veins were punctured at three levels depending on the length of the segment of insufficient GSV/SSV. Each patient was treated with a compression agent in the form of a second compression class elastic stockings (20–30 mm Hg). Control visits on the basis of the accepted protocol were established in 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36 months after the procedure. Results: During 24 months of observation, the evaluation of the Flebogrif® catheter method was based on the analysis of results obtained in four categories: effectiveness of the method, expressed as the ratio of the number of successfully closed veins ablated with the Flebogrif® catheter to the number of observed cases of recanalization; clinical improvement of venous insufficiency symptoms, based on the VCSS, CEAP, VAPS scale; safety of the method, expressed in terms of quantity and quality of observed complications; technical characteristics of the method. The obtained results were analyzed statistically using tests for non-parametric variables. The effectiveness of the method based on the obtained results was 92%. A statistically significant decrease in the intensity of clinical symptoms in relation to the preoperative condition was observed. The number and quality of the observed complications allow considering the procedure of vein ablation with the use of Flebogrif® catheter as safe, possible to perform in ambulatory conditions. Conclusions: Effectiveness of the method of 92% in 24-month observation; good cosmetic effect; a statistically significant decrease in the intensity of clinical symptoms in 24-month observation; the low incidence of complications allows to consider the method safe; the method of surgery allows to perform the procedure in ambulatory conditions.","PeriodicalId":41754,"journal":{"name":"Acta Angiologica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Angiologica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5603/aa.2019.0008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Introduction: The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy of the endovascular ablation method of GSV/ /SSV superficial venous insufficiency using Flebogrif® catheter, the safety of the method, expressed in number and quality of observed complications in 24-month observation. Material and methods: Initially, the observed group included 200 patients undergoing ablation of insufficient GSV/SSV. During 24 months of observation, this number decreased to 158, which seems to be a natural process. All patients signed the informed consent form approved by the Bioethics Committee of the Medical University of Lublin. Based on clinical evaluation, including ultrasound assessment, 200 patients, including 170 women and 30 men, were admitted to the study using the adopted criteria of inclusion/exclusion. In the studied group of patients, 172 great saphenous veins (GSV) and 28 short saphenous veins (SSV) were ablated. The treated inefficient veins were punctured at three levels depending on the length of the segment of insufficient GSV/SSV. Each patient was treated with a compression agent in the form of a second compression class elastic stockings (20–30 mm Hg). Control visits on the basis of the accepted protocol were established in 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36 months after the procedure. Results: During 24 months of observation, the evaluation of the Flebogrif® catheter method was based on the analysis of results obtained in four categories: effectiveness of the method, expressed as the ratio of the number of successfully closed veins ablated with the Flebogrif® catheter to the number of observed cases of recanalization; clinical improvement of venous insufficiency symptoms, based on the VCSS, CEAP, VAPS scale; safety of the method, expressed in terms of quantity and quality of observed complications; technical characteristics of the method. The obtained results were analyzed statistically using tests for non-parametric variables. The effectiveness of the method based on the obtained results was 92%. A statistically significant decrease in the intensity of clinical symptoms in relation to the preoperative condition was observed. The number and quality of the observed complications allow considering the procedure of vein ablation with the use of Flebogrif® catheter as safe, possible to perform in ambulatory conditions. Conclusions: Effectiveness of the method of 92% in 24-month observation; good cosmetic effect; a statistically significant decrease in the intensity of clinical symptoms in 24-month observation; the low incidence of complications allows to consider the method safe; the method of surgery allows to perform the procedure in ambulatory conditions.
新型微创隐静脉消融机械化学技术。本中心经验:24个月随访结果
引言:本研究的目的是评估使用Fleborif®导管治疗GSV//SSV浅静脉功能不全的血管内消融方法的疗效、该方法的安全性,以及在24个月观察中观察到的并发症的数量和质量。材料和方法:最初,观察组包括200名接受GSV/SSV不足消融的患者。在24个月的观察中,这个数字下降到158,这似乎是一个自然的过程。所有患者均签署了卢布林医科大学生物伦理委员会批准的知情同意书。根据包括超声评估在内的临床评估,采用采用的纳入/排除标准,200名患者(包括170名女性和30名男性)被纳入研究。在研究组患者中,切除了172条大隐静脉(GSV)和28条短隐静脉(SSV)。根据GSV/SSV不足段的长度,在三个水平上穿刺处理过的低效静脉。每位患者均使用第二类压缩级弹性袜(20-30毫米汞柱)形式的压缩剂进行治疗。在手术后1、3、6、12、24、36个月,根据接受的方案进行对照访视。结果:在24个月的观察期间,Fleborif®导管方法的评估基于对四类结果的分析:该方法的有效性,表示为用Fleboriv®导管消融的成功闭合静脉数与观察到的再通病例数的比率;基于VCSS、CEAP、VAPS量表的静脉功能不全症状的临床改善;该方法的安全性,以观察到的并发症的数量和质量表示;该方法的技术特征。使用非参数变量检验对获得的结果进行统计学分析。基于所获得的结果,该方法的有效性为92%。观察到与术前情况相关的临床症状强度在统计学上显著降低。观察到的并发症的数量和质量允许考虑在门诊条件下使用Fleborif®导管进行静脉消融术的安全性。结论:该方法24个月观察有效率达92%;美容效果好;在24个月的观察中,临床症状的强度在统计学上显著降低;并发症发生率低,可以认为该方法是安全的;手术方法允许在门诊条件下进行手术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Angiologica
Acta Angiologica PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
26 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Angiologica is a bilingual (Polish/English) quarterly for angiologists and vascular surgeons as well as for other doctors interested in vascular disorders. Original papers, reviews, case reports and letters submitted by authors from different countries, concerning physiology, pathology, presentation, diagnostics and treatment of vascular system, are published. Thorough contents of Acta Angiologica provide valuable information about modern diagnostic and therapeutic issues as well as advances in basic sciences and pharmacology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信