Study on the Reasoning Traceability and Reform of Family Related Judgment Documents

Wu Yi
{"title":"Study on the Reasoning Traceability and Reform of Family Related Judgment Documents","authors":"Wu Yi","doi":"10.5539/jpl.v16n1p55","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"How to present good reasons in judgment documents has been a common problem. This study takes family judgment documents as the pointcuts and is going to discuss how to achieve effective reform through the reasoning traceability analysis. In current stage, China has not promulgated separate legal regulations on family related litigation, the corresponding reasoning part is based on the relevant provisions of civil proceedings, such as the guidance related to the writing of civil judgment document issued by the Supreme People's Court in 2016. Although this document makes some provisions on reasoning in civil judgment document, taking the consideration of certain specialties of family cases, the identities of the parties also have special certain natures, reasoning in family judgment documents usually focus more on the integration of \"emotion\". Therefore, to standardize family judgment documents at this stage only by relevant provisions of conventional civil litigation is not sufficient, and not able to meet the demands of family cases, and it also shows problems in judicial practice. In 2016, China comprehensively carried out the pilot reform of family justice, which plays an imperative role in following research and development of family judgment document. And the level of reasoning in family judgment document improved in the process of form innovation and practice experience accumulation. However, the pilot work does not set up standardized and complete specifications on making family judgment document. Through the combination on the theoretical analysis and judicial practice cases, and the summary of main problems encountered at present, this research will propose suggested countermeasures, and is targeted to facilitate the development of reasoning in family judgment document.","PeriodicalId":90619,"journal":{"name":"Journal of politics and law","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of politics and law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5539/jpl.v16n1p55","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

How to present good reasons in judgment documents has been a common problem. This study takes family judgment documents as the pointcuts and is going to discuss how to achieve effective reform through the reasoning traceability analysis. In current stage, China has not promulgated separate legal regulations on family related litigation, the corresponding reasoning part is based on the relevant provisions of civil proceedings, such as the guidance related to the writing of civil judgment document issued by the Supreme People's Court in 2016. Although this document makes some provisions on reasoning in civil judgment document, taking the consideration of certain specialties of family cases, the identities of the parties also have special certain natures, reasoning in family judgment documents usually focus more on the integration of "emotion". Therefore, to standardize family judgment documents at this stage only by relevant provisions of conventional civil litigation is not sufficient, and not able to meet the demands of family cases, and it also shows problems in judicial practice. In 2016, China comprehensively carried out the pilot reform of family justice, which plays an imperative role in following research and development of family judgment document. And the level of reasoning in family judgment document improved in the process of form innovation and practice experience accumulation. However, the pilot work does not set up standardized and complete specifications on making family judgment document. Through the combination on the theoretical analysis and judicial practice cases, and the summary of main problems encountered at present, this research will propose suggested countermeasures, and is targeted to facilitate the development of reasoning in family judgment document.
家庭裁判文书的推理溯源与改革研究
如何在判决书中提出充分的理由一直是一个普遍存在的问题。本研究以家事裁判文书为切入点,探讨如何通过推理溯源分析实现有效的改革。现阶段,中国并没有单独出台有关家事诉讼的法律规定,相应的推理部分是基于民事诉讼的相关规定,如最高人民法院2016年发布的《关于撰写民事裁判文书的指导意见》。虽然本文件对民事裁判文书中的推理作出了一些规定,但考虑到家事案件的某些特殊性,当事人的身份也具有特殊的某些性质,家事裁判文书中的推理往往更侧重于“情感”的整合。因此,现阶段仅靠常规民事诉讼的相关规定来规范家事裁判文书是不够的,不能满足家事案件的要求,也显示出司法实践中的问题。2016年,中国全面开展家事司法改革试点,对后续家事裁判文书的研究与开发具有重要意义。在形式创新和实践经验积累的过程中,家事裁判文书的推理水平不断提高。但是,试点工作并没有对家庭判决书的制作建立规范、完善的规范。本研究将通过对理论分析与司法实践案例的结合,总结目前遇到的主要问题,提出对策建议,有针对性地促进家事裁判文书推理工作的发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信