Comparative Law on the Authority of the House of Representatives (Indonesia) with the National Parliament (Timor Leste)

SASI Pub Date : 2023-03-11 DOI:10.47268/sasi.v29i1.1075
I. N. P. B. Rumiartha, Anak Agung Sagung Ngurah Indradewi, Alarico Gomes
{"title":"Comparative Law on the Authority of the House of Representatives (Indonesia) with the National Parliament (Timor Leste)","authors":"I. N. P. B. Rumiartha, Anak Agung Sagung Ngurah Indradewi, Alarico Gomes","doi":"10.47268/sasi.v29i1.1075","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Based on the history of the formation of the state constitutions of Timor Leste and the state of Indonesia, it is interesting to conduct special research on a comparison of the legal powers contained in the constitution of the DPR (Indonesia) and the National Parliament (Timor Leste).Purposes of the Research: The purpose of this study is to explain the legal comparison of the powers granted by the Constitution, in this case the legal comparison of the powers of the House of Representatives (Indonesia) and the National Parliament (Timor Leste).Methods of the Research: This research uses normative research methods and comparative law research methods.Results of the Research: The similarity between the people's representative assembly (Indonesia) and the national parliament (Timor Leste) is that they both have the authority to formulate laws, as well as the similarity of legislative functions, budgetary functions, and oversight functions. The difference lies in the right to elect a general high councilor. In the Indonesian constitution, there is no general ministry high council election. The People's Representative Council does not have the authority to elect and appoint ministers, this is the President's authority as a perrogative right. Meanwhile in Timor Leste, the National Parliament elects the high council of general ministries.","PeriodicalId":53158,"journal":{"name":"SASI","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SASI","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47268/sasi.v29i1.1075","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Based on the history of the formation of the state constitutions of Timor Leste and the state of Indonesia, it is interesting to conduct special research on a comparison of the legal powers contained in the constitution of the DPR (Indonesia) and the National Parliament (Timor Leste).Purposes of the Research: The purpose of this study is to explain the legal comparison of the powers granted by the Constitution, in this case the legal comparison of the powers of the House of Representatives (Indonesia) and the National Parliament (Timor Leste).Methods of the Research: This research uses normative research methods and comparative law research methods.Results of the Research: The similarity between the people's representative assembly (Indonesia) and the national parliament (Timor Leste) is that they both have the authority to formulate laws, as well as the similarity of legislative functions, budgetary functions, and oversight functions. The difference lies in the right to elect a general high councilor. In the Indonesian constitution, there is no general ministry high council election. The People's Representative Council does not have the authority to elect and appoint ministers, this is the President's authority as a perrogative right. Meanwhile in Timor Leste, the National Parliament elects the high council of general ministries.
关于众议院权力(印度尼西亚)与国民议会(东帝汶)的比较法
引言:根据东帝汶和印度尼西亚国家宪法的形成历史,有趣的是,对《印度尼西亚民主共和国宪法》和《东帝汶国民议会宪法》所载的法律权力进行比较研究。研究目的:本研究的目的是解释《宪法》赋予的权力的法律比较,在这种情况下,众议院(印度尼西亚)和国民议会(东帝汶)权力的法律比较。研究方法:本研究采用规范研究方法和比较法研究方法。研究结果:人民代表大会(印度尼西亚)和国民议会(东帝汶)的相似之处在于,它们都有制定法律的权力,以及立法职能、预算职能和监督职能的相似性。不同之处在于选举一般高级议员的权利。在印度尼西亚宪法中,没有举行总部高级理事会选举。人民代表委员会无权选举和任命部长,这是总统的一项特权。与此同时,在东帝汶,国民议会选举一般部委高级理事会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
审稿时长
3 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信