A. Alfaiate, D. Noivo, V. Clérigo, V. Durão, F. Durão, M. Castanho, S. Sousa, L. Fernandes, Paula Duarte
{"title":"Portuguese Society of Intensive Care Score for Predicting SARS-CoV-2 Infection Applied to Inpatients with Pneumonia: A Reliable Tool?","authors":"A. Alfaiate, D. Noivo, V. Clérigo, V. Durão, F. Durão, M. Castanho, S. Sousa, L. Fernandes, Paula Duarte","doi":"10.4236/OJRD.2021.112005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: Early identification of patients with the novel coronavirus induced-disease 2019 (COVID-19) and pneumonia is \ncurrently challenging. Few data are available on validated scores \npredictive of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) \ninfection. The Portuguese Society of Intensive Care (PSIC) proposed a risk \nscore whose main goals were to predict a higher probability of COVID-19 and \noptimize hospital resources, adjusting patients’ intervention. This study aimed \nto validate the PSIC risk score applied to inpatients with pneumonia. Methods: A retrospective analysis of 207 patients with pneumonia admitted to a \nsuspected/confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection \nspecialized ward (20/03 to 20/05/2020) was performed. Score variables \nwere analyzed to determine the significance of the independent predictive variables on the probability of a \npositive SARS-CoV-2 rRT-PCR test. The binary logistic regression \nmodeling approach was selected. The best cut-off value was obtained with the \nReceiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve together with the evaluation of \nthe discriminatory power through the Area Under the Curve (AUC). Results: The \nvalidation cohort included 145 patients. Typical chest \ncomputed-tomography features (OR, 12.16; 95% CI, 3.32 - 44.50) \nand contact with a positive SARS-CoV-2 patient (OR, 6.56; 95% CI, 1.33 - 32.30) \nwere the most significant independent predictive variables. A score ≥ 10 \nincreased suspicion for SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia. The AUC was 0.82 (95% CI, 0.73 - 0.91) demonstrating the good discriminating power for \nCOVID-19 probability stratification in inpatients with pneumonia. Conclusions: The application of the PSIC score to inpatients with pneumonia may be of \nvalue in predicting the risk of COVID-19. Further \nstudies from other centers are needed to validate this score widely.","PeriodicalId":83134,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of respiratory diseases","volume":"11 1","pages":"49-60"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of respiratory diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4236/OJRD.2021.112005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: Early identification of patients with the novel coronavirus induced-disease 2019 (COVID-19) and pneumonia is
currently challenging. Few data are available on validated scores
predictive of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2)
infection. The Portuguese Society of Intensive Care (PSIC) proposed a risk
score whose main goals were to predict a higher probability of COVID-19 and
optimize hospital resources, adjusting patients’ intervention. This study aimed
to validate the PSIC risk score applied to inpatients with pneumonia. Methods: A retrospective analysis of 207 patients with pneumonia admitted to a
suspected/confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection
specialized ward (20/03 to 20/05/2020) was performed. Score variables
were analyzed to determine the significance of the independent predictive variables on the probability of a
positive SARS-CoV-2 rRT-PCR test. The binary logistic regression
modeling approach was selected. The best cut-off value was obtained with the
Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve together with the evaluation of
the discriminatory power through the Area Under the Curve (AUC). Results: The
validation cohort included 145 patients. Typical chest
computed-tomography features (OR, 12.16; 95% CI, 3.32 - 44.50)
and contact with a positive SARS-CoV-2 patient (OR, 6.56; 95% CI, 1.33 - 32.30)
were the most significant independent predictive variables. A score ≥ 10
increased suspicion for SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia. The AUC was 0.82 (95% CI, 0.73 - 0.91) demonstrating the good discriminating power for
COVID-19 probability stratification in inpatients with pneumonia. Conclusions: The application of the PSIC score to inpatients with pneumonia may be of
value in predicting the risk of COVID-19. Further
studies from other centers are needed to validate this score widely.