Is Greater Than 0.5 MAC Inhalational Agent Use Post-Bypass Related to Need for Inotropic and/or Vasoconstrictor Support?

Tara A. Lenk, Carlos E. Guerra-Londono, Thomas Graul, Marc A. Murinson, Prabhdeep Hehar, G. Divine, R. Modak
{"title":"Is Greater Than 0.5 MAC Inhalational Agent Use Post-Bypass Related to Need for Inotropic and/or Vasoconstrictor Support?","authors":"Tara A. Lenk, Carlos E. Guerra-Londono, Thomas Graul, Marc A. Murinson, Prabhdeep Hehar, G. Divine, R. Modak","doi":"10.3390/HEARTS2020017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and Aims: We hypothesized that maintaining a patient on moderate–high doses of potent inhalational agent for greater than 30 min during the post-bypass period would be an independent predictor of initiation and usage of either inotropic and/or vasopressor infusions. Setting and Design: This study is a retrospective design and approved by the institutional review board. The setting was a single-center, academic tertiary care hospital in Detroit, Michigan. Materials and Methods: Three-hundred, ninety-seven elective cardiac surgery patients were identified for chart review. Electronic medical records were reviewed to collect demographics and perioperative data. Statistics used include a propensity score regression adjusted analysis utilizing logistic regression models and a multivariable model. Results: A propensity score regression adjusted analysis was performed and then applied in both univariate and multivariate logistic regression models with a p value of <0.05 reaching statistical significance. Fifty-six percent of the participants had an exposure of greater than 30 min of a minimum alveolar concentration of isoflurane greater than 0.5 (ETISO ≥ 0.5MAC, 30 min) in the post-bypass period. After adjusting for propensity score, this was found to be a significant predictor of inotrope and/or vasoconstrictor use post-bypass (OR 2.49, 95% CI 1.15–5.38, p = 0.021). In the multivariate model, pulmonary hypertension (OR 5.9; 95% CI 1.33–26.28; p = 0.02), Euroscore II (2.73; 95% CI 1.35–5.5; p = 0.005), and cardiopulmonary bypass hours (OR 1.86; 95% CI 1.02–3.4; p = 0.042) emerged as significant. Conclusions: This study showed that an ETISO ≥ 0.5MAC, 30 min exposure during the immediate post-bypass period during elective cardiac surgery was an independent predictor of a patient being started on inotrope or vasoconstrictor infusions. Further research should consider a prospective design and examine depth of anesthesia during the post-bypass period.","PeriodicalId":93563,"journal":{"name":"Hearts (Basel, Switzerland)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3390/HEARTS2020017","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hearts (Basel, Switzerland)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/HEARTS2020017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Aims: We hypothesized that maintaining a patient on moderate–high doses of potent inhalational agent for greater than 30 min during the post-bypass period would be an independent predictor of initiation and usage of either inotropic and/or vasopressor infusions. Setting and Design: This study is a retrospective design and approved by the institutional review board. The setting was a single-center, academic tertiary care hospital in Detroit, Michigan. Materials and Methods: Three-hundred, ninety-seven elective cardiac surgery patients were identified for chart review. Electronic medical records were reviewed to collect demographics and perioperative data. Statistics used include a propensity score regression adjusted analysis utilizing logistic regression models and a multivariable model. Results: A propensity score regression adjusted analysis was performed and then applied in both univariate and multivariate logistic regression models with a p value of <0.05 reaching statistical significance. Fifty-six percent of the participants had an exposure of greater than 30 min of a minimum alveolar concentration of isoflurane greater than 0.5 (ETISO ≥ 0.5MAC, 30 min) in the post-bypass period. After adjusting for propensity score, this was found to be a significant predictor of inotrope and/or vasoconstrictor use post-bypass (OR 2.49, 95% CI 1.15–5.38, p = 0.021). In the multivariate model, pulmonary hypertension (OR 5.9; 95% CI 1.33–26.28; p = 0.02), Euroscore II (2.73; 95% CI 1.35–5.5; p = 0.005), and cardiopulmonary bypass hours (OR 1.86; 95% CI 1.02–3.4; p = 0.042) emerged as significant. Conclusions: This study showed that an ETISO ≥ 0.5MAC, 30 min exposure during the immediate post-bypass period during elective cardiac surgery was an independent predictor of a patient being started on inotrope or vasoconstrictor infusions. Further research should consider a prospective design and examine depth of anesthesia during the post-bypass period.
旁路手术后吸入剂的使用是否大于0.5 MAC与肌力和/或血管收缩剂支持的需要有关?
背景和目的:我们假设,在转流后期间,让患者服用中高剂量强效吸入剂超过30分钟,将是开始和使用肌力和/或血管升压药输注的独立预测因素。设置和设计:本研究为回顾性设计,经机构审查委员会批准。当时的环境是位于密歇根州底特律的一家单中心、学术性三级护理医院。材料和方法:对397例择期心脏手术患者进行图表回顾。对电子医疗记录进行了审查,以收集人口统计数据和围手术期数据。使用的统计数据包括利用逻辑回归模型和多变量模型的倾向得分回归调整分析。结果:进行倾向评分回归调整分析,然后应用于单变量和多变量逻辑回归模型,p值<0.05,达到统计学意义。56%的参与者在搭桥术后暴露于肺泡最低浓度大于0.5的异氟烷(ETISO≥0.5MAC,30分钟)的时间超过30分钟。在调整倾向评分后,发现这是转流术后使用inotrope和/或血管收缩剂的重要预测因素(or 2.49,95%CI 1.15–5.38,p=0.021)。在多变量模型中,肺动脉高压(or 5.9;95%CI 1.33–26.28;p=0.02),Euroscore II(2.73;95%CI 1.35–5.5;p=0.005),心肺转流时间(OR 1.86;95%CI 1.02–3.4;p=0.042)表现为显著。结论:这项研究表明,在选择性心脏手术的转流后即刻,ETISO≥0.5MAC,暴露30分钟是患者开始输注inotrope或血管收缩剂的独立预测因素。进一步的研究应考虑前瞻性设计,并检查搭桥术后麻醉的深度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信