Changing Face of Pastoral Theology

IF 0.7 0 RELIGION
K. Samuel Lee, Danjuma Gibson
{"title":"Changing Face of Pastoral Theology","authors":"K. Samuel Lee, Danjuma Gibson","doi":"10.1080/10649867.2020.1783804","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"I [K. Samuel Lee] recently had a conversation with an editor from a mainline denominational publishing house. She bemoaned the fact that there is a lack of pastoral care resources which can be used in educating local church pastors. She added that pastoral (and practical) theology as an academic discipline has become highly technical and theoretical, resulting in a big gap between academia and the church. I think it is important that we academicians heed this book editor’s critique. At the same time, she was ‘interpreting the signs of the times’ (Matthew 16:30) from her vantage point, which points to much deeper and more fundamental changes taking place in all spheres of life including theological education, the church, and global society. T. Howland Sanks wrote a decade ago about some of these changes taking place in the past half century. Sanks pointed out that (1) there have been significant changes in ‘who does theology.’ Theology is done no longer by clergy, who were exclusively men. Theology used to be done by clergy and for clergy in the church. Theology is no longer an enterprise owned by men, clergy, or the church. (2) As with ‘all things’ in life, ‘theology’ has become globalized and is not done just in Europe and North America. Robert J. Schreter speaks of ‘global theological flows,’ complexifying the discipline of theology. (3) ‘For whom is theology done’ has changed. It is no longer that theology is for the church community and clergy. Theology is now done by what Sanks calls ‘intelligent inquirers’ some but not all of whom are Christian. Some theologians use the context of the Christian tradition but others do theology ‘to contribute to the discussion of contemporary issues and to provide guidance for contemporary society.’ Theology today addresses an audience that includes the church, the academy, and society. (4) There have been changes in our cosmological understanding. Homo Sapiens no longer occupies the center of the universe with dominion over all things. We instead are finding that we occupy an infinitesimal place in the cosmos, which is leading us to reconsider the meaning and the purpose of our role and position in the cosmos. (5) There is the growing recognition that ‘theology has always been done in and from a particular context’ whether or not theologians were conscious of it. All theologies relate to or are constructed out of the local situation or location. (6) Theology is now done with ‘an increased awareness of the plurality of cultures, races, ethnicities, religions and socio-political ways of organizing ourselves.’ The attention to plurality has given rise to the emphasis of ‘the particular, local and regional’ with an increasing expectation that theologians participate in and dialogue about politics, international relations, education and religions, to name a few. Theology now commonly seeks interdisciplinary partners; theology to adequately address the complexities of a given topic, cannot be done from confinement within dogmatics alone. ‘The changing faces of theology’ Sanks pointed out a decade ago can be seen in the waning role of the clerical and church authority. Such a change is accompanied by the religious institutional turmoil challenging both the church and theological institutions. The COVID-19 pandemic, for example, further surfaces our deep spiritual longings in that we raise the questions about theodicy, social justice at the face of the racial disparity in healthcare, personal and","PeriodicalId":29885,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pastoral Theology","volume":"30 1","pages":"83 - 85"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10649867.2020.1783804","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pastoral Theology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10649867.2020.1783804","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

I [K. Samuel Lee] recently had a conversation with an editor from a mainline denominational publishing house. She bemoaned the fact that there is a lack of pastoral care resources which can be used in educating local church pastors. She added that pastoral (and practical) theology as an academic discipline has become highly technical and theoretical, resulting in a big gap between academia and the church. I think it is important that we academicians heed this book editor’s critique. At the same time, she was ‘interpreting the signs of the times’ (Matthew 16:30) from her vantage point, which points to much deeper and more fundamental changes taking place in all spheres of life including theological education, the church, and global society. T. Howland Sanks wrote a decade ago about some of these changes taking place in the past half century. Sanks pointed out that (1) there have been significant changes in ‘who does theology.’ Theology is done no longer by clergy, who were exclusively men. Theology used to be done by clergy and for clergy in the church. Theology is no longer an enterprise owned by men, clergy, or the church. (2) As with ‘all things’ in life, ‘theology’ has become globalized and is not done just in Europe and North America. Robert J. Schreter speaks of ‘global theological flows,’ complexifying the discipline of theology. (3) ‘For whom is theology done’ has changed. It is no longer that theology is for the church community and clergy. Theology is now done by what Sanks calls ‘intelligent inquirers’ some but not all of whom are Christian. Some theologians use the context of the Christian tradition but others do theology ‘to contribute to the discussion of contemporary issues and to provide guidance for contemporary society.’ Theology today addresses an audience that includes the church, the academy, and society. (4) There have been changes in our cosmological understanding. Homo Sapiens no longer occupies the center of the universe with dominion over all things. We instead are finding that we occupy an infinitesimal place in the cosmos, which is leading us to reconsider the meaning and the purpose of our role and position in the cosmos. (5) There is the growing recognition that ‘theology has always been done in and from a particular context’ whether or not theologians were conscious of it. All theologies relate to or are constructed out of the local situation or location. (6) Theology is now done with ‘an increased awareness of the plurality of cultures, races, ethnicities, religions and socio-political ways of organizing ourselves.’ The attention to plurality has given rise to the emphasis of ‘the particular, local and regional’ with an increasing expectation that theologians participate in and dialogue about politics, international relations, education and religions, to name a few. Theology now commonly seeks interdisciplinary partners; theology to adequately address the complexities of a given topic, cannot be done from confinement within dogmatics alone. ‘The changing faces of theology’ Sanks pointed out a decade ago can be seen in the waning role of the clerical and church authority. Such a change is accompanied by the religious institutional turmoil challenging both the church and theological institutions. The COVID-19 pandemic, for example, further surfaces our deep spiritual longings in that we raise the questions about theodicy, social justice at the face of the racial disparity in healthcare, personal and
教牧神学面貌的改变
我[K。塞缪尔·李[Samuel Lee]最近与一家主流宗派出版社的编辑进行了一次对话。她哀叹缺乏教牧关怀资源,而这些资源可用于教育地方教会的牧师。她补充说,教牧(和实践)神学作为一门学科已经变得高度技术性和理论性,导致学术界和教会之间的巨大差距。我认为重要的是,我们这些学者应该听取这本书编辑的批评。与此同时,她从自己的角度“解释时代的征兆”(马太福音16:30),指出生活的各个领域都发生了更深刻、更根本的变化,包括神学教育、教会和全球社会。霍兰德·桑克斯(T. Howland Sanks)十年前写过一篇关于过去半个世纪发生的一些变化的文章。桑克斯指出(1)“谁研究神学”的观念发生了重大变化。神学不再是由神职人员完成的,他们完全是男性。神学过去是由神职人员完成的,也是为教会中的神职人员完成的。神学不再是男人、神职人员或教会所拥有的事业。(2)与生活中的“所有事情”一样,“神学”已经变得全球化,而不仅仅是在欧洲和北美。Robert J. Schreter谈到“全球神学流动”,使神学学科复杂化。(3)“神学是为谁而作”已经改变了。神学不再是为教会团体和神职人员服务的。神学现在是由桑克斯所谓的“聪明的询问者”来研究的,其中一些人是基督徒,但并非全部都是。一些神学家使用基督教传统的背景,但另一些神学家使用神学来促进对当代问题的讨论,并为当代社会提供指导。今天,神学面对的听众包括教会、学术界和社会。我们对宇宙的认识发生了变化。智人不再占据宇宙的中心,主宰一切。相反,我们发现我们在宇宙中占据了一个无穷小的位置,这促使我们重新考虑我们在宇宙中的角色和地位的意义和目的。人们越来越认识到,不管神学家们是否意识到这一点,“神学总是在特定的语境中或从特定的语境中完成的”。所有的神学都与当地的情况或地点有关或建立在当地的情况或地点之外。(6)神学现在是随着“对文化、种族、民族、宗教和组织我们自己的社会政治方式的多元性的日益认识”而完成的。对多元性的关注引起了对“特殊的、地方的和区域的”的强调,人们越来越期望神学家参与政治、国际关系、教育和宗教等方面的对话。神学现在通常寻求跨学科的合作伙伴;神学要充分解决给定主题的复杂性,不能仅从教条主义的限制中完成。“神学面貌的变化”,桑克斯在十年前就指出,这可以从神职人员和教会权威角色的减弱中看出来。这种变化伴随着对教会和神学机构都提出挑战的宗教制度动荡。例如,2019冠状病毒病大流行进一步暴露了我们深刻的精神渴望,因为面对医疗保健、个人和社会的种族差异,我们提出了关于神正论和社会正义的问题
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
16.70%
发文量
21
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信