INVESTIGATING THE COMPARISON OF SHIP RESISTANCE COMPONENTS BETWEEN U AND V-SHAPED HULLS

IF 0.6 Q3 ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
M. L. Hakim, T. Tuswan, A. Firdaus, O. Mursid
{"title":"INVESTIGATING THE COMPARISON OF SHIP RESISTANCE COMPONENTS BETWEEN U AND V-SHAPED HULLS","authors":"M. L. Hakim, T. Tuswan, A. Firdaus, O. Mursid","doi":"10.11113/jurnalteknologi.v85.19382","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The selection of a hull design with minimal drag is an important effort to reduce emission levels on ships. Two different hull shapes, U and V hulls, have unique properties that affect their drag production, which has been studied extensively in the past. This study aims to re-examine the differences between the two hull types by conducting a simple analysis of drag prediction results using empirical and numerical slender body methods. Both hull models in this study have the same size and volume. The results indicate that the U hull has a higher frictional resistance ( ) than the V hull due to its wider wetted surface area ( ). Additionally, the viscous pressure resistance ( ) and form factor coefficient ( ) of the U hull are also higher than those of the V hull. However, for Froude numbers (Fr) above 0.245, the U hull has lower wave resistance ( ) than the V hull, whereas for Fr below 0.245, the U hull has higher . Overall, the U hull produces a higher total resistance ( ) than the V hull at low speeds, but a lower  at high speeds. Therefore, the choice of hull shape for minimizing a ship's resistance is influenced by the desired speed of service. If Fr is low, below 0.24, a V-shaped hull is more suitable. However, if Fr is higher than 0.24, a U-shaped hull is more appropriate.","PeriodicalId":47541,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Teknologi-Sciences & Engineering","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Teknologi-Sciences & Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11113/jurnalteknologi.v85.19382","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The selection of a hull design with minimal drag is an important effort to reduce emission levels on ships. Two different hull shapes, U and V hulls, have unique properties that affect their drag production, which has been studied extensively in the past. This study aims to re-examine the differences between the two hull types by conducting a simple analysis of drag prediction results using empirical and numerical slender body methods. Both hull models in this study have the same size and volume. The results indicate that the U hull has a higher frictional resistance ( ) than the V hull due to its wider wetted surface area ( ). Additionally, the viscous pressure resistance ( ) and form factor coefficient ( ) of the U hull are also higher than those of the V hull. However, for Froude numbers (Fr) above 0.245, the U hull has lower wave resistance ( ) than the V hull, whereas for Fr below 0.245, the U hull has higher . Overall, the U hull produces a higher total resistance ( ) than the V hull at low speeds, but a lower  at high speeds. Therefore, the choice of hull shape for minimizing a ship's resistance is influenced by the desired speed of service. If Fr is low, below 0.24, a V-shaped hull is more suitable. However, if Fr is higher than 0.24, a U-shaped hull is more appropriate.
研究u型和v型船体阻力分量的比较
选择具有最小阻力的船体设计是降低船舶排放水平的重要努力。两种不同的船体形状,U型和V型,具有影响其阻力产生的独特性能,这在过去已经得到了广泛的研究。本研究旨在通过使用经验和数值细长体方法对阻力预测结果进行简单分析,重新审视两种船体类型之间的差异。本研究中两种船体模型具有相同的尺寸和体积。结果表明,U型船体由于其更宽的湿表面积,比V型船体具有更高的摩擦阻力()。此外,U型船体的粘压阻力()和外形系数()也高于V型船体。当弗劳德数(Fr)大于0.245时,U型船体比V型船体阻力小,Fr小于0.245时,U型船体阻力大。总的来说,U型船体在低速时比V型船体产生更高的总阻力(),但在高速时较低。因此,船体形状的选择,以尽量减少船舶的阻力是由期望的服务速度的影响。如果Fr较低,低于0.24,则v型船体更合适。但是,如果Fr大于0.24,则u型船体更合适。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Jurnal Teknologi-Sciences & Engineering
Jurnal Teknologi-Sciences & Engineering ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
96
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信