Mozambique’s security challenges: Routinised response or broader approach?

IF 1.1 Q3 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS
Albert K. Domson-Lindsay
{"title":"Mozambique’s security challenges: Routinised response or broader approach?","authors":"Albert K. Domson-Lindsay","doi":"10.1080/10246029.2021.1992458","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The ongoing security crisis in Mozambique reveals the limitations of the mainstream statist approach to security promotion. Whenever there is social conflict or unrest, state authorities instinctively and routinely rely on military means to deal with it. However, this approach disregards the root causes of the problem, which are often the internal social, political and economic triggers of insecurity. Presently there are international security actors assisting the Mozambican government in dealing with the armed conflict in their country. As a contribution to the emerging body of work on Mozambique’s security challenges beginning in 1990, this paper adopts a critical security perspective in the analysis of the problem. The view is taken that there ought to be a balanced or broader approach to security. Although a military response is necessary for combating hostile forces, this effort should go in tandem with addressing the fundamental causes of the crisis. The paper argues that in Mozambique poor governance in the form of corruption, political patronage, marginalisation of minority groups, centralisation of power and other exclusionary practices are the major sources of the country’s insecurity. Some proposals are suggested to address these challenges.","PeriodicalId":44882,"journal":{"name":"African Security Review","volume":"31 1","pages":"3 - 18"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African Security Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10246029.2021.1992458","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

ABSTRACT The ongoing security crisis in Mozambique reveals the limitations of the mainstream statist approach to security promotion. Whenever there is social conflict or unrest, state authorities instinctively and routinely rely on military means to deal with it. However, this approach disregards the root causes of the problem, which are often the internal social, political and economic triggers of insecurity. Presently there are international security actors assisting the Mozambican government in dealing with the armed conflict in their country. As a contribution to the emerging body of work on Mozambique’s security challenges beginning in 1990, this paper adopts a critical security perspective in the analysis of the problem. The view is taken that there ought to be a balanced or broader approach to security. Although a military response is necessary for combating hostile forces, this effort should go in tandem with addressing the fundamental causes of the crisis. The paper argues that in Mozambique poor governance in the form of corruption, political patronage, marginalisation of minority groups, centralisation of power and other exclusionary practices are the major sources of the country’s insecurity. Some proposals are suggested to address these challenges.
莫桑比克的安全挑战:常规应对还是更广泛的方法?
莫桑比克持续的安全危机揭示了主流国家主义安全促进方法的局限性。每当出现社会冲突或动荡时,国家当局本能地、照例地依靠军事手段来应对。然而,这种做法忽视了问题的根源,这些根源往往是不安全的内部社会、政治和经济诱因。目前有国际安全行为体协助莫桑比克政府处理该国的武装冲突。作为对1990年开始的关于莫桑比克安全挑战的新工作机构的贡献,本文在分析该问题时采用了关键的安全观点。有人认为,应该对安全采取一种平衡的或更广泛的办法。虽然军事反应对打击敌对势力是必要的,但这一努力应与解决危机的根本原因同时进行。该论文认为,在莫桑比克,腐败、政治庇护、少数群体边缘化、权力集中和其他排他性做法等形式的治理不善是该国不安全的主要来源。针对这些挑战,提出了一些建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
African Security Review
African Security Review INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
12.50%
发文量
24
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信