THE UNEVENTFUL RECEPTION OF MANDEVILLE’S IDEAS IN THE EIGHTEENTH-CENTURY DUTCH REPUBLIC, OR THE MYSTERIOUS CASE OF THE MISSING OUTRAGE

IF 1.2 3区经济学 Q1 HISTORY

Journal of the History of Economic Thought Pub Date : 2023-02-22 DOI:10.1017/S1053837222000128

J. Hengstmengel, R. Verburg

引用次数: 0

Abstract

The heated debates that Bernard Mandeville’s work inspired in Britain, France, and Germany are well-documented. No such account is available for the public reception of his ideas in his country of birth, the Dutch Republic. This paper seeks to fill that void. Remarkably, his ideas did not cause much of a stir. Consequently, the paper explains the divergent pattern of response from the Dutch. It is argued that his ideas were either reverting to disputes that had already been settled or were out of touch with the general climate of opinion in the Netherlands.

查看原文本刊更多论文

曼德维尔思想在八世纪荷兰共和国的平静接受，或失踪的愤怒的神秘案例

伯纳德·曼德维尔的作品在英国、法国和德国引发了激烈的争论，这是有据可查的。在他的出生国荷兰共和国，公众对他的想法没有这样的了解。本文试图填补这一空白。值得注意的是，他的想法并没有引起太大的轰动。因此，本文解释了荷兰人的不同反应模式。有人认为，他的想法要么回到了已经解决的争端，要么与荷兰的普遍舆论脱节。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Journal of the History of Economic Thought Multiple-

CiteScore

1.30

自引率

22.20%

发文量

期刊介绍： The mission of JHET is to further the objectives of the History of Economics Society. These are to promote interest in and inquiry into the history of economics and related parts of intellectual history, facilitate communication and discourse among scholars working in the field of the history of economics, and disseminate knowledge about the history of economics. JHET therefore encourages and makes available research in the fields of history of economic thought and the history of economic methodology. The work of many distinguished authors has been published in its pages. It is recognised as being a first class international scholarly publication. All articles are fully peer reviewed.