Qualitaty of Olfaction in Patients with Nasal and Sinuses Polyposis before and after Endo-scopic Sinus Surgery in, Vali e Asr Hospital in 2017

M. Asghari, M. Bakhshai
{"title":"Qualitaty of Olfaction in Patients with Nasal and Sinuses Polyposis before and after Endo-scopic Sinus Surgery in, Vali e Asr Hospital in 2017","authors":"M. Asghari, M. Bakhshai","doi":"10.52547/ismj.23.2.108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Olfaction plays an important role in human life and promotes quality of life through under-standing various odors. Nasal polyps are among the common causes of olfactory impairment. There are many different treatment options for polyps most notably the diagnosis and elimination of underlying causes. Some polyps do not respond to medication therapy or they relapse, and therefore require surgery. The present study aimed to determine olfactory function in patients with sinus and nasal polyposis before and after endoscopy. Materials and Methods: In this cross-sectional study, patients admitted to, Vali e Asr Hospital of Birjand in 2015 for endoscopic nasal polypectomy were included. Evaluation of olfactory quality was performed prior to and four weeks after the surgery. Olfactory function was evaluated by a semi-structured questionnaire on the quality of olfactory, taste and appetite combined with the Quick Odor Detection test. Data was analyzed in SPSS 23 software using descriptive statistics of frequency, perentage, mean and stand-ard deviation, and analytical statistics of McNemar’s and Wilcoxon tests. P value of <0.05 was considered significant. Results: Thirty-six patients were enrolled. All patients underwent endoscopic polypectomy. Their mean age was 39.14±11.69 years. Most of them were male (n=21, 58.3%). History of nasal polyps, asthma, allergic rhinitis and aspirin sensitivity was positive in 27.8%, 11.1%, 47.2% and 27.8% of patients. Nasal polyps were unilateral in 58.3% of patients and bilateral in 41.7% of patients. There was a significant improvement in olfactory quality after surgery (p<0.001). The sense of smell was present in 75% or the patients before and in 100% of them after the surgery, and the difference was statistically significant (p=0.004). Conclusion: Olfactory dysfunction in patients with polyps is remarkably prevalent. Overall, the results of this study show polypectomy significantly improved patients’ sense and quality of smell.","PeriodicalId":14583,"journal":{"name":"Iranian South Medical Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iranian South Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52547/ismj.23.2.108","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Olfaction plays an important role in human life and promotes quality of life through under-standing various odors. Nasal polyps are among the common causes of olfactory impairment. There are many different treatment options for polyps most notably the diagnosis and elimination of underlying causes. Some polyps do not respond to medication therapy or they relapse, and therefore require surgery. The present study aimed to determine olfactory function in patients with sinus and nasal polyposis before and after endoscopy. Materials and Methods: In this cross-sectional study, patients admitted to, Vali e Asr Hospital of Birjand in 2015 for endoscopic nasal polypectomy were included. Evaluation of olfactory quality was performed prior to and four weeks after the surgery. Olfactory function was evaluated by a semi-structured questionnaire on the quality of olfactory, taste and appetite combined with the Quick Odor Detection test. Data was analyzed in SPSS 23 software using descriptive statistics of frequency, perentage, mean and stand-ard deviation, and analytical statistics of McNemar’s and Wilcoxon tests. P value of <0.05 was considered significant. Results: Thirty-six patients were enrolled. All patients underwent endoscopic polypectomy. Their mean age was 39.14±11.69 years. Most of them were male (n=21, 58.3%). History of nasal polyps, asthma, allergic rhinitis and aspirin sensitivity was positive in 27.8%, 11.1%, 47.2% and 27.8% of patients. Nasal polyps were unilateral in 58.3% of patients and bilateral in 41.7% of patients. There was a significant improvement in olfactory quality after surgery (p<0.001). The sense of smell was present in 75% or the patients before and in 100% of them after the surgery, and the difference was statistically significant (p=0.004). Conclusion: Olfactory dysfunction in patients with polyps is remarkably prevalent. Overall, the results of this study show polypectomy significantly improved patients’ sense and quality of smell.
2017年Vali e Asr医院鼻内镜鼻窦手术前后鼻息肉患者的嗅觉质量
背景:嗅觉在人类生活中扮演着重要的角色,通过对各种气味的了解来提高生活质量。鼻息肉是嗅觉障碍的常见原因之一。息肉有许多不同的治疗选择,最显著的是诊断和消除潜在的原因。有些息肉对药物治疗无效或复发,因此需要手术治疗。本研究旨在确定鼻窦和鼻息肉患者在内镜检查前后的嗅觉功能。材料与方法:本横断面研究纳入2015年在Birjand Vali e Asr医院行内镜下鼻息肉切除术的患者。嗅觉质量评估在手术前和手术后四周进行。嗅觉功能评估采用半结构化的嗅觉、味觉和食欲质量问卷,并结合快速气味检测测试。采用SPSS 23软件进行数据分析,采用频率、百分比、均值、标准差描述性统计及McNemar检验和Wilcoxon检验的分析统计。P值<0.05。结果:36例患者入组。所有患者均行内镜下息肉切除术。平均年龄39.14±11.69岁。以男性居多(n=21, 58.3%)。鼻息肉史、哮喘史、变应性鼻炎史和阿司匹林敏感性史分别为27.8%、11.1%、47.2%和27.8%。单侧鼻息肉占58.3%,双侧鼻息肉占41.7%。术后嗅觉质量有显著改善(p<0.001)。术前75%的患者嗅觉正常,术后100%嗅觉正常,差异有统计学意义(p=0.004)。结论:嗅觉功能障碍在息肉患者中非常普遍。总体而言,本研究结果显示息肉切除术显著改善了患者的感觉和嗅觉质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
50 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信