Design Research for Rational Decision Making and Behavior Change in Emergency Situations

Q1 Arts and Humanities
Mansoo Kim, Mingzhu Cui, Suji Choi, Ahyoung Jeong, Soyeon Kim, Sangwon Lee
{"title":"Design Research for Rational Decision Making and Behavior Change in Emergency Situations","authors":"Mansoo Kim, Mingzhu Cui, Suji Choi, Ahyoung Jeong, Soyeon Kim, Sangwon Lee","doi":"10.15187/adr.2023.08.36.3.253","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Recently, large and small emergencies are constantly occurring around the world. In particular, the risk and importance of emergency situations at an individual level are increasing due to the increase in chronic diseases from an aging population, excessive stress due to overwork, and overcrowding of urban populations. Existing individual emergency research lacks consideration of psychological factors and has limitations in that empirical research has not been sufficiently conducted. Based on empirical research, this study proposes a behavioral change induction design that considers the decision-making process and psychological factors from the perspective of the victim's surroundings, considering the characteristics of individual emergencies. Methods Through previous studies, we examined the disaster situation (emergency) and decision-making process that are the background of this study, and analyzed the reasonable decision-making obstacles that occurred in this process. Then, after selecting a behavioral change induction model to overcome the derived cause, an intervention design using the model was proposed. Experiments were conducted by group using the proposed design and quantitative and qualitative result analysis were verified for design effectiveness. Results In the event of an emergency, it was confirmed that factors that interfere with rational decision-making and behavioral changes due to negative psychological factors occurred in the victim's neighbors. The two designs proposed in this study (design to overcome cognitive bias and design to transfer expertise information) were effectively applied in the situation to induce behavioral changes. Conclusions Considering the characteristics of emergency situations, the study is significant in that it presents a design guide that can induce rational decision-making and behavioral changes from the perspective of the victim's surroundings. It is expected that emergency situations that may occur in daily life can be efficiently overcome through the use and application of the design proposed as a result of the study.","PeriodicalId":52137,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Design Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Design Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15187/adr.2023.08.36.3.253","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Recently, large and small emergencies are constantly occurring around the world. In particular, the risk and importance of emergency situations at an individual level are increasing due to the increase in chronic diseases from an aging population, excessive stress due to overwork, and overcrowding of urban populations. Existing individual emergency research lacks consideration of psychological factors and has limitations in that empirical research has not been sufficiently conducted. Based on empirical research, this study proposes a behavioral change induction design that considers the decision-making process and psychological factors from the perspective of the victim's surroundings, considering the characteristics of individual emergencies. Methods Through previous studies, we examined the disaster situation (emergency) and decision-making process that are the background of this study, and analyzed the reasonable decision-making obstacles that occurred in this process. Then, after selecting a behavioral change induction model to overcome the derived cause, an intervention design using the model was proposed. Experiments were conducted by group using the proposed design and quantitative and qualitative result analysis were verified for design effectiveness. Results In the event of an emergency, it was confirmed that factors that interfere with rational decision-making and behavioral changes due to negative psychological factors occurred in the victim's neighbors. The two designs proposed in this study (design to overcome cognitive bias and design to transfer expertise information) were effectively applied in the situation to induce behavioral changes. Conclusions Considering the characteristics of emergency situations, the study is significant in that it presents a design guide that can induce rational decision-making and behavioral changes from the perspective of the victim's surroundings. It is expected that emergency situations that may occur in daily life can be efficiently overcome through the use and application of the design proposed as a result of the study.
紧急情况下理性决策与行为改变的设计研究
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Archives of Design Research
Archives of Design Research Arts and Humanities-Visual Arts and Performing Arts
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
52
期刊介绍: Archives of Design Research (ADR) is an international journal publishing original research in the field of design, including industrial design, visual communication design, interaction design, space design, and service design. It also invites research outcomes from design-related interdisciplinary fields such as the humanities, arts, technology, society and business. It is an open-access journal, publishing four issues per year. Currently papers are published in both English and Korean with an English abstract. ADR aims to build a strong foundation of knowledge in design through the introduction of basic, applied and clinical research. ADR serves as a venue and platform to archive and transfer fundamental design theories, methods, tools and cases. Research areas covered in the journal include: -Design Theory and its Methodology -Design Philosophy, Ethics, Values, and Issues -Design Education -Design Management and Strategy -Sustainability, Culture, History, and Societal Design -Human Behaviors, Perception, and Emotion -Semantics, Aesthetics and Experience in Design -Interaction and Interface Design -Design Tools and New Media -Universal Design/Inclusive Design -Design Creativity -Design Projects and Case Studies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信