The longitudinal influence of supportive messages on stress reactivity and general well-being for LGBTQ+ recipients of hate speech: Comparing the relative effects of verbal person-centered and autonomy support

IF 3.1 2区文学 Q1 COMMUNICATION

Communication Monographs Pub Date : 2023-02-14 DOI:10.1080/03637751.2023.2171081

J. P. Crowley, A. Denes, A. Bleakley, Katrina T. Webber, Devon Geary, M. DelGreco, Joseph Whitt, C. Guest, Emily K. Hamlin

引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT LBGTQ+ individuals (N = 50) engaged in a 10-minute discussion with a close network member about an experience they had with hate speech that was targeted at their sexual orientation. The relative effects of two predominant social support theoretical frameworks, verbal person centeredness and autonomy support, were compared. Discussions were rated by trained raters for the presence of each type of support. Results support both theoretical frameworks as predicting decreases in stress across the discussion as well as increases in reported general well-being over one month. Theoretical implications and methodological comparison are discussed.

查看原文本刊更多论文

支持信息对LGBTQ+仇恨言论接受者压力反应和总体幸福感的纵向影响:比较言语以人为本支持和自主支持的相对效果

LBGTQ+个体(N = 50)与亲密的网络成员进行了10分钟的讨论，讨论了他们针对其性取向的仇恨言论的经历。比较了两种主要的社会支持理论框架——言语以人为中心和自主支持的相对效果。讨论由训练有素的评分员对每种支持的存在程度进行打分。结果支持这两种理论框架，预测在讨论过程中压力会减少，以及一个月内报告的总体幸福感会增加。讨论了理论意义和方法比较。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Communication Monographs COMMUNICATION-

CiteScore

5.40

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Communication Monographs, published in March, June, September & December, reports original, theoretically grounded research dealing with human symbolic exchange across the broad spectrum of interpersonal, group, organizational, cultural and mediated contexts in which such activities occur. The scholarship reflects diverse modes of inquiry and methodologies that bear on the ways in which communication is shaped and functions in human interaction. The journal endeavours to publish the highest quality communication social science manuscripts that are grounded theoretically. The manuscripts aim to expand, qualify or integrate existing theory or additionally advance new theory. The journal is not restricted to particular theoretical or methodological perspectives.