review of social dynamics in complex energy systems models

Q1 Social Sciences
Alaize Dall-Orsoletta, Mauricio Uriona-Maldonado, G. Dranka, P. Ferreira
{"title":"review of social dynamics in complex energy systems models","authors":"Alaize Dall-Orsoletta, Mauricio Uriona-Maldonado, G. Dranka, P. Ferreira","doi":"10.54337/ijsepm.7478","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The problem of techno-economic approaches to evaluating energy transition pathways has been constantly reported in the literature. Existing research recognises the critical role played by social aspects in energy systems models. System dynamics (SD) has been pointed out among modelling techniques as a suitable tool to evaluate the interdisciplinary nature of energy transitions. This paper explores how energy system-related SD models have incorporated social aspects through a literature review. Models were assessed based on their geographical resolution, time horizon, methodological approach, and main themes: supply-demand, energy-economy-environment (3E), energy-transport, water-energy-food (WEF) nexus, and consumer-centric and socio-political dynamics. Social aspects considered include behaviour and lifestyle changes, social acceptance, willingness to participate, socio-economic measures, among others. As expected, the representation of social aspects was not standard among the papers analysed. Socio-economic aspects were most commonly included in supply-demand and 3E models. Energy-transport and WEF models mainly incorporated changes in travel and consumption habits, respectively. The last theme had a more diverse approach to social aspects that deserves further attention, especially for energy access and justice issues. Other research lines include modelling approaches combination, enhanced participatory and transparent processes during model development, and use of SD models in policy-aiding and stakeholders’ information processes.","PeriodicalId":37803,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Sustainable Energy Planning and Management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Sustainable Energy Planning and Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54337/ijsepm.7478","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The problem of techno-economic approaches to evaluating energy transition pathways has been constantly reported in the literature. Existing research recognises the critical role played by social aspects in energy systems models. System dynamics (SD) has been pointed out among modelling techniques as a suitable tool to evaluate the interdisciplinary nature of energy transitions. This paper explores how energy system-related SD models have incorporated social aspects through a literature review. Models were assessed based on their geographical resolution, time horizon, methodological approach, and main themes: supply-demand, energy-economy-environment (3E), energy-transport, water-energy-food (WEF) nexus, and consumer-centric and socio-political dynamics. Social aspects considered include behaviour and lifestyle changes, social acceptance, willingness to participate, socio-economic measures, among others. As expected, the representation of social aspects was not standard among the papers analysed. Socio-economic aspects were most commonly included in supply-demand and 3E models. Energy-transport and WEF models mainly incorporated changes in travel and consumption habits, respectively. The last theme had a more diverse approach to social aspects that deserves further attention, especially for energy access and justice issues. Other research lines include modelling approaches combination, enhanced participatory and transparent processes during model development, and use of SD models in policy-aiding and stakeholders’ information processes.
复杂能源系统模型中的社会动力学研究综述
文献中不断报道用技术经济方法评估能源转型途径的问题。现有研究认识到社会方面在能源系统模型中发挥的关键作用。在建模技术中,系统动力学(SD)被指出是评估能量转换跨学科性质的合适工具。本文通过文献综述探讨了与能源系统相关的SD模型是如何融入社会方面的。根据其地理分辨率、时间范围、方法论方法和主要主题对模型进行了评估:供需、能源经济环境(3E)、能源运输、水-能源-粮食(WEF)关系以及以消费者为中心的社会政治动态。所考虑的社会方面包括行为和生活方式的改变、社会接受度、参与意愿、社会经济措施等。不出所料,在所分析的论文中,社会方面的表述并不标准。社会经济方面通常包括在供需和3E模型中。能源运输和世界经济论坛的模式主要分别包括旅行和消费习惯的变化。最后一个主题对社会方面采取了更加多样化的做法,值得进一步关注,特别是在能源获取和司法问题上。其他研究方向包括建模方法的组合、模型开发过程中增强的参与性和透明性过程,以及在政策援助和利益相关者的信息过程中使用SD模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Sustainable Energy Planning and Management
International Journal of Sustainable Energy Planning and Management Social Sciences-Geography, Planning and Development
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal is an international interdisciplinary journal in Sustainable Energy Planning and Management combining engineering and social science within Energy System Analysis, Feasibility Studies and Public Regulation. The journal especially welcomes papers within the following three focus areas: Energy System analysis including theories, methodologies, data handling and software tools as well as specific models and analyses at local, regional, country and/or global level. Economics, Socio economics and Feasibility studies including theories and methodologies of institutional economics as well as specific feasibility studies and analyses. Public Regulation and management including theories and methodologies as well as specific analyses and proposals in the light of the implementation and transition into sustainable energy systems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信