Radiological Comparison of Meniscofemoral Ligaments in Patients with Intact and Ruptured Anterior Cruciate Ligament

Q3 Medicine
N. Karahan, A. Oztermeli, S. Duman, G. Ozdemir, D. Cılız, Niyazi Erdem Yaşar
{"title":"Radiological Comparison of Meniscofemoral Ligaments in Patients with Intact and Ruptured Anterior Cruciate Ligament","authors":"N. Karahan, A. Oztermeli, S. Duman, G. Ozdemir, D. Cılız, Niyazi Erdem Yaşar","doi":"10.5812/asjsm.108487","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Evaluating concomitant injury in patients with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture is important for predicting long-term results. Meniscofemoral ligament (MFL) rupture has been observed in patients with anterior cruciate ligament rupture in arthroscopic evaluation for ruptured ACL. Objectives: The objective of this study was to investigate the concomitant meniscofemoral ligaments injury in patients with anterior cruciate ligament ruptures via magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Methods: A total of 200 patients (with ruptured ACL, n = 100; with intact ACL, n = 100) were retrospectively evaluated via MRI. In the group with ruptured ACL; the patients who were diagnosed as having noncontact ACL injuries and had undergone primary ACL reconstructions were included. The control group included 100 patients with suspected ACL rupture (from a similar injury mechanism) and whose MRI revealed an intact ACL. In the group with ruptured ACL, the time from injury to MRI was evaluated. A comparison of the presence of anterior MFL (aMFL) and posterior MFL (pMFL) between the two groups was evaluated. Results: In the ACL ruptured group, a significantly lower presence of aMFL or pMFL was observed compared to the control group (P = 0.001). The time from injury to MRI was significantly higher in the patients with absent MFL defined in MRI relative to the other groups (P = 0.001). Conclusions: We observed absence of MFLs (aMFL and pMFL) in a significant majority of patients with ruptured ACLs. Furthermore, we found a significant relationship between the time from injury to MRI and absence of MFL in the ruptured ACL group.","PeriodicalId":8847,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Sports Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5812/asjsm.108487","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Evaluating concomitant injury in patients with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture is important for predicting long-term results. Meniscofemoral ligament (MFL) rupture has been observed in patients with anterior cruciate ligament rupture in arthroscopic evaluation for ruptured ACL. Objectives: The objective of this study was to investigate the concomitant meniscofemoral ligaments injury in patients with anterior cruciate ligament ruptures via magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Methods: A total of 200 patients (with ruptured ACL, n = 100; with intact ACL, n = 100) were retrospectively evaluated via MRI. In the group with ruptured ACL; the patients who were diagnosed as having noncontact ACL injuries and had undergone primary ACL reconstructions were included. The control group included 100 patients with suspected ACL rupture (from a similar injury mechanism) and whose MRI revealed an intact ACL. In the group with ruptured ACL, the time from injury to MRI was evaluated. A comparison of the presence of anterior MFL (aMFL) and posterior MFL (pMFL) between the two groups was evaluated. Results: In the ACL ruptured group, a significantly lower presence of aMFL or pMFL was observed compared to the control group (P = 0.001). The time from injury to MRI was significantly higher in the patients with absent MFL defined in MRI relative to the other groups (P = 0.001). Conclusions: We observed absence of MFLs (aMFL and pMFL) in a significant majority of patients with ruptured ACLs. Furthermore, we found a significant relationship between the time from injury to MRI and absence of MFL in the ruptured ACL group.
前交叉韧带完整和断裂患者半月板-股骨韧带的放射学比较
背景:评估前交叉韧带(ACL)破裂患者的伴随损伤对预测远期结果很重要。在前交叉韧带破裂的关节镜评估中,观察到半月板股骨韧带(MFL)破裂。目的:本研究的目的是通过磁共振成像(MRI)研究前交叉韧带断裂患者并发半月板股韧带损伤。方法:共200例(前交叉韧带破裂,n = 100;前交叉韧带完整(n = 100),通过MRI回顾性评估。前交叉韧带破裂组;诊断为非接触性前交叉韧带损伤并进行了初级前交叉韧带重建的患者也包括在内。对照组包括100例疑似前交叉韧带破裂的患者(来自类似的损伤机制),其MRI显示前交叉韧带完整。在前交叉韧带破裂组,评估从损伤到MRI的时间。比较两组患者的前侧耳滤过性淋巴瘤(aMFL)和后侧耳滤过性淋巴瘤(pMFL)的存在情况。结果:前交叉韧带破裂组aMFL或pMFL的发生率明显低于对照组(P = 0.001)。MRI中未发现MFL的患者从损伤到MRI的时间明显高于其他组(P = 0.001)。结论:我们观察到在绝大多数acl破裂患者中没有MFLs (aMFL和pMFL)。此外,我们发现从受伤到MRI的时间与前交叉韧带破裂组中MFL的缺失有显著的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Asian Journal of Sports Medicine
Asian Journal of Sports Medicine Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信