Prohibition on research involving psychiatric patients subject to coercion

S. Birkeland, Kathryn Berzins, J. Baker, Titti Mattsson, K. Søvig, F. Gildberg
{"title":"Prohibition on research involving psychiatric patients subject to coercion","authors":"S. Birkeland, Kathryn Berzins, J. Baker, Titti Mattsson, K. Søvig, F. Gildberg","doi":"10.18261/issn.2387-4546-2020-01-02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper compares legislation on clinical research conducted on patients subject to coercion in the Scandinavian countries and the UK, examines it from a human rights perspective, and problematizes the Danish legal model as the only one PROHIBITION ON RESEARCH INVOLVING PSYCHIATRIC PATIENTS SUBJECT TO COERCION employing a total ban on this kind of research. Reference is made to the consequences to evidence-based psychiatric care improvements and international ethical principle state-ments generally entitling psychiatric patients to treatment under similar ethical and scientific conditions as patients with other illnesses, given the absolute premise that the patient does not object to research participation and always retains the right to withdraw.","PeriodicalId":31677,"journal":{"name":"Kritisk Juss","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kritisk Juss","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18261/issn.2387-4546-2020-01-02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This paper compares legislation on clinical research conducted on patients subject to coercion in the Scandinavian countries and the UK, examines it from a human rights perspective, and problematizes the Danish legal model as the only one PROHIBITION ON RESEARCH INVOLVING PSYCHIATRIC PATIENTS SUBJECT TO COERCION employing a total ban on this kind of research. Reference is made to the consequences to evidence-based psychiatric care improvements and international ethical principle state-ments generally entitling psychiatric patients to treatment under similar ethical and scientific conditions as patients with other illnesses, given the absolute premise that the patient does not object to research participation and always retains the right to withdraw.
禁止对受胁迫的精神病患者进行研究
本文比较了斯堪的纳维亚国家和英国关于对受胁迫患者进行临床研究的立法,从人权的角度对其进行了审查,并对丹麦法律模式提出了质疑,因为丹麦法律模式是唯一一个禁止对受胁迫精神病患者进行研究的国家,完全禁止这类研究。提到了循证精神病护理改进的后果,以及国际伦理原则的规定,这些规定通常使精神病患者有权在与其他疾病患者相似的伦理和科学条件下接受治疗,前提是患者不反对参与研究,并始终保留退出的权利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书