Comparative accuracy assessment of the Bowring, Chord and Power series models for direct and indirect determination of geodetic coordinates

IF 0.3 Q4 REMOTE SENSING
O. G. Omogunloye, D. Omar, C. Okolie, O. Daramola, Tosin J. Salami
{"title":"Comparative accuracy assessment of the Bowring, Chord and Power series models for direct and indirect determination of geodetic coordinates","authors":"O. G. Omogunloye, D. Omar, C. Okolie, O. Daramola, Tosin J. Salami","doi":"10.4314/sajg.v10i2.9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The computation of geodetic coordinates is the basis of geodetic surveying and foundation to modern techniques for geodetic network analyses and design of integrated survey schemes for monitoring and detecting structural deformations. The positional accuracy achievable by Direct and Indirect models of geodetic position determination depends on the varying lengths, azimuths and latitude of the first point of the network of stations. Existing knowledge gaps preclude a comprehensive understanding of the relative accuracies of these methods. Therefore, the aim of this study is to determine the achievable accuracies of three models (Bowring, Chord and Power Series) for direct and indirect position determination vis-a-vis the network configuration. The data comprised of 33 controls in the D-Chain geodetic network located in North-Central Nigeria, with a range of network of lines between 15.530km and 113.254km. Various attributes of the network such as azimuth, angle, distance, and coordinates were computed to a high accuracy and precision using a program written in the Matlab software environment. The results of the direct and indirect computation were summarised using descriptive statistics. Also, the accuracies of the computed coordinates were assessed by comparisons with the provisional (initial) coordinates of the controls. In the analysis of coordinate differences, the positional root mean square error (RMSE) for each of the three models in decreasing order of accuracies are: 4.572639341′′ (Chord), 4.601685022′′ (Power Series) and 4.601701034′′ (Bowring). The positional mean absolute deviation (MAD) for the three models in decreasing order of accuracies are 3.788841258′′ (Chord), 3.813184934′′ (Power Series) and 3.813198679′′ (Bowring) and this agrees with the RMSE trend for the network. This study has shown that the D-chain network configuration favours the use of Chord model for position determination based on the adopted configuration.","PeriodicalId":43854,"journal":{"name":"South African Journal of Geomatics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South African Journal of Geomatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/sajg.v10i2.9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REMOTE SENSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The computation of geodetic coordinates is the basis of geodetic surveying and foundation to modern techniques for geodetic network analyses and design of integrated survey schemes for monitoring and detecting structural deformations. The positional accuracy achievable by Direct and Indirect models of geodetic position determination depends on the varying lengths, azimuths and latitude of the first point of the network of stations. Existing knowledge gaps preclude a comprehensive understanding of the relative accuracies of these methods. Therefore, the aim of this study is to determine the achievable accuracies of three models (Bowring, Chord and Power Series) for direct and indirect position determination vis-a-vis the network configuration. The data comprised of 33 controls in the D-Chain geodetic network located in North-Central Nigeria, with a range of network of lines between 15.530km and 113.254km. Various attributes of the network such as azimuth, angle, distance, and coordinates were computed to a high accuracy and precision using a program written in the Matlab software environment. The results of the direct and indirect computation were summarised using descriptive statistics. Also, the accuracies of the computed coordinates were assessed by comparisons with the provisional (initial) coordinates of the controls. In the analysis of coordinate differences, the positional root mean square error (RMSE) for each of the three models in decreasing order of accuracies are: 4.572639341′′ (Chord), 4.601685022′′ (Power Series) and 4.601701034′′ (Bowring). The positional mean absolute deviation (MAD) for the three models in decreasing order of accuracies are 3.788841258′′ (Chord), 3.813184934′′ (Power Series) and 3.813198679′′ (Bowring) and this agrees with the RMSE trend for the network. This study has shown that the D-chain network configuration favours the use of Chord model for position determination based on the adopted configuration.
Bowring, Chord和Power系列模型直接和间接测定大地坐标的比较精度评估
大地坐标的计算是大地测量的基础,也是大地测量网络分析和监测和探测结构变形的综合测量方案设计的现代技术的基础。大地测量位置确定的直接和间接模型可实现的位置精度取决于站点网络第一点的不同长度、方位角和纬度。现有的知识差距阻碍了对这些方法的相对准确性的全面理解。因此,本研究的目的是确定三个模型(Bowring、Chord和Power Series)相对于网络配置的直接和间接位置确定的可实现精度。数据由位于尼日利亚中北部的D-Chain大地测量网络中的33个控制点组成,线路网络范围在15.530km至113.254km之间。使用Matlab软件环境中编写的程序,高精度和高精度地计算了网络的各种属性,如方位角、角度、距离和坐标。使用描述性统计对直接和间接计算的结果进行了总结。此外,通过与对照的临时(初始)坐标进行比较来评估计算坐标的准确性。在坐标差分析中,三个模型中每个模型的位置均方根误差(RMSE)按精度递减顺序为:4.572639341′′(Chord)、4.601685022′′′(幂级数)和4.601701034′′(Bowring)。三个模型的位置平均绝对偏差(MAD)按精度递减顺序为3.788841258′′(弦)、3.813184934′′(幂级数)和3.813198679′′(Bowring),这与网络的RMSE趋势一致。本研究表明,D链网络配置有利于在所采用的配置的基础上使用Chord模型进行位置确定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
82
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信