Trend analysis of postpartum hemorrhage rate and blood loss among delivery women at a ClassIII Grade A hospital from 2014 to 2018

Yang Xu, Zhaoyan Pang, Yanting Chen, Zhaonian Wang, Linya Li, Xiaorui Chen, Jinrong Zhao
{"title":"Trend analysis of postpartum hemorrhage rate and blood loss among delivery women at a ClassIII Grade A hospital from 2014 to 2018","authors":"Yang Xu, Zhaoyan Pang, Yanting Chen, Zhaonian Wang, Linya Li, Xiaorui Chen, Jinrong Zhao","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.CN115682-20190720-02592","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo explore the trend of postpartum hemorrhage after two-child policy and to analyze the high-risk risks of postpartum hemorrhage so as to put forward intervention measures to reduce the postpartum hemorrhage. \n \n \nMethods \nWe retrospectively selected 8 784 delivery women with routine production inspection and hospitalized at a ClassⅢ Grade A hospital from 2014 to 2018. We collected the general information, record of production inspection, delivery record and analyzed the trend of postpartum hemorrhage rate, blood loss and related high-risk factors. \n \n \nResults \nFrom 2014 to 2018, there were statistical differences in the postpartum hemorrhage rate, serious postpartum hemorrhage rate and blood loss (P<0.05) . The trend showed an increasing trend. In 2017, the postpartum hemorrhage rate, serious postpartum hemorrhage rate and blood loss were 16.9%, 6.1% and (540.1±758.2) ml respectively highest in those years. From 2014 to 2018, the percentage of delivery women with advanced ages, multiple pregnancy, pregnancy times≥2, history of cesarean section≥2 were increasing; delivery women with the prenatal hemoglobin≤110 g/L and percentage of natural labor were decreasing with a statistical difference (P<0.05) ; the percentage of emergency cesarean section was on the rise; the percentage of placental expulsion time from 15 to 30 minutes declined with statistical differences (P<0.05) ; the percentage of placental expulsion time≥30 minutes and above was no significant trend. \n \n \nConclusions \nFrom 2014 to 2018, the postpartum hemorrhage rate, serious postpartum hemorrhage rate and blood loss did not show an increasing trend. However, the percentage of high-risk pregnant and delivery women increased gradually. Therefore, we should carry out the pregnancy risk assessment rating for pregnant and delivery women and formulate a suitable high-risk assessment tool for postpartum hemorrhage so as to reduce the incidence of postpartum hemorrhage. \n \n \nKey words: \nPostpartum hemorrhage; Puerpera; Blood loss; Change trend; High-risk factors","PeriodicalId":10070,"journal":{"name":"中华现代护理杂志","volume":"26 1","pages":"1297-1302"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华现代护理杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.CN115682-20190720-02592","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective To explore the trend of postpartum hemorrhage after two-child policy and to analyze the high-risk risks of postpartum hemorrhage so as to put forward intervention measures to reduce the postpartum hemorrhage. Methods We retrospectively selected 8 784 delivery women with routine production inspection and hospitalized at a ClassⅢ Grade A hospital from 2014 to 2018. We collected the general information, record of production inspection, delivery record and analyzed the trend of postpartum hemorrhage rate, blood loss and related high-risk factors. Results From 2014 to 2018, there were statistical differences in the postpartum hemorrhage rate, serious postpartum hemorrhage rate and blood loss (P<0.05) . The trend showed an increasing trend. In 2017, the postpartum hemorrhage rate, serious postpartum hemorrhage rate and blood loss were 16.9%, 6.1% and (540.1±758.2) ml respectively highest in those years. From 2014 to 2018, the percentage of delivery women with advanced ages, multiple pregnancy, pregnancy times≥2, history of cesarean section≥2 were increasing; delivery women with the prenatal hemoglobin≤110 g/L and percentage of natural labor were decreasing with a statistical difference (P<0.05) ; the percentage of emergency cesarean section was on the rise; the percentage of placental expulsion time from 15 to 30 minutes declined with statistical differences (P<0.05) ; the percentage of placental expulsion time≥30 minutes and above was no significant trend. Conclusions From 2014 to 2018, the postpartum hemorrhage rate, serious postpartum hemorrhage rate and blood loss did not show an increasing trend. However, the percentage of high-risk pregnant and delivery women increased gradually. Therefore, we should carry out the pregnancy risk assessment rating for pregnant and delivery women and formulate a suitable high-risk assessment tool for postpartum hemorrhage so as to reduce the incidence of postpartum hemorrhage. Key words: Postpartum hemorrhage; Puerpera; Blood loss; Change trend; High-risk factors
某二级甲等医院2014 - 2018年产妇产后出血及出血量趋势分析
目的探讨二孩政策后产妇产后出血的趋势,分析产后出血的高危因素,提出减少产后出血的干预措施。方法回顾性选择2014 ~ 2018年在某Ⅲ三级甲等医院进行常规生产检查的产妇8 784例。收集一般资料、生产检查记录、分娩记录,分析产后出血率、失血趋势及相关高危因素。结果2014年与2018年两组产妇产后大出血率、重度产后大出血率、出血量差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。趋势呈上升趋势。2017年产后出血率、重度产后出血率和出血量分别为16.9%、6.1%和(540.1±758.2)ml,为历年最高。2014 - 2018年,高龄、多胎、妊娠次数≥2次、剖宫产史≥2次的分娩妇女比例呈上升趋势;产前血红蛋白≤110 g/L、自然产程百分比下降,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);急诊剖宫产比例呈上升趋势;15 ~ 30 min排胎盘率下降,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);排胎盘时间≥30min及以上的百分比无明显变化趋势。结论2014 - 2018年,产后大出血率、重度产后大出血率和出血量均未呈现上升趋势。然而,高危孕妇和产妇的比例逐渐增加。因此,我们应该对孕妇和产妇进行妊娠风险评估评级,制定适合的产后出血高危评估工具,以降低产后出血的发生率。关键词:产后出血;产妇;失血;变化趋势;高危因素
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37482
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信