Residential Aged Care and Homelike Environments: A scoping literature review of views of the aged care workforce

IF 0.6 Q4 Health Professions
Naisim Sum, Jill Francis, L. Naccarella
{"title":"Residential Aged Care and Homelike Environments: A scoping literature review of views of the aged care workforce","authors":"Naisim Sum, Jill Francis, L. Naccarella","doi":"10.24083/apjhm.v18i1.2003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Evidence exists of the benefits of homelike environments for residents of residential aged care facil-ities (RACF). To date, most research has focused on the perceptions, experiences, and quality-of-life outcomes of homelike environments from residents’ perspectives. The views of the aged care workforce (ACW) about homelike environment in RACF is under-researched. A scoping review was conducted of the Pubmed, Medline, PsychInfo, Cinahl, and Scopus databases in April 2021. Search terms included: homelike environment; residential aged care; staff. Perspectives of ACW were synthesized using Rijnaard’s framework, encompassing three key categories. Of 1597 papers identified, 21 articles published from 1990 to 2021 met the eligibility criteria for review. The scop-ing review provided insights from nursing staff, facility managers, administrators, and also activity coordinators, laundry, and catering staff. Eight key elements of homelike environments were identi-fied, further classified into three key categories: (1) built environment (indoor and outdoor spaces); (2) psychological elements (residents’ choices and control, maintaining residents’ beliefs and habits); (3) social elements (relationships with residents, families, and staff, communal environments and maintaining contact with community). No important differences in themes across ACW groups were evident. Homelike environments were associated with higher job satisfaction, lower burnout, lower staff turnover and did not contribute to staff distress nor perceptions of reduced safety. Homelike environments are potentially beneficial for ACW. Review findings can inform planning, implemen-tation, and evaluation of homelike environments, to ultimately enhance outcomes for ACW and res-idents in RACFs.","PeriodicalId":42935,"journal":{"name":"Asia Pacific Journal of Health Management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia Pacific Journal of Health Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24083/apjhm.v18i1.2003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Evidence exists of the benefits of homelike environments for residents of residential aged care facil-ities (RACF). To date, most research has focused on the perceptions, experiences, and quality-of-life outcomes of homelike environments from residents’ perspectives. The views of the aged care workforce (ACW) about homelike environment in RACF is under-researched. A scoping review was conducted of the Pubmed, Medline, PsychInfo, Cinahl, and Scopus databases in April 2021. Search terms included: homelike environment; residential aged care; staff. Perspectives of ACW were synthesized using Rijnaard’s framework, encompassing three key categories. Of 1597 papers identified, 21 articles published from 1990 to 2021 met the eligibility criteria for review. The scop-ing review provided insights from nursing staff, facility managers, administrators, and also activity coordinators, laundry, and catering staff. Eight key elements of homelike environments were identi-fied, further classified into three key categories: (1) built environment (indoor and outdoor spaces); (2) psychological elements (residents’ choices and control, maintaining residents’ beliefs and habits); (3) social elements (relationships with residents, families, and staff, communal environments and maintaining contact with community). No important differences in themes across ACW groups were evident. Homelike environments were associated with higher job satisfaction, lower burnout, lower staff turnover and did not contribute to staff distress nor perceptions of reduced safety. Homelike environments are potentially beneficial for ACW. Review findings can inform planning, implemen-tation, and evaluation of homelike environments, to ultimately enhance outcomes for ACW and res-idents in RACFs.
养老院和居家环境:老年护理工作者观点的范围界定文献综述
有证据表明,居家环境对养老院(RACF)的居民有好处。到目前为止,大多数研究都集中在从居民的角度对居家环境的感知、体验和生活质量结果。老年护理工作者(ACW)对养老院居家环境的看法正在研究中。2021年4月,对Pubmed、Medline、PsychInfo、Cinahl和Scopus数据库进行了范围界定审查。搜索词包括:家常环境;养老院;工作人员使用Rijnaard的框架综合了ACW的观点,包括三个关键类别。在确定的1597篇论文中,1990年至2021年发表的21篇文章符合审查资格标准。范围审查提供了来自护理人员、设施经理、管理员以及活动协调员、洗衣店和餐饮人员的见解。确定了居家环境的八个关键要素,并将其进一步分为三个关键类别:(1)建筑环境(室内和室外空间);(2) 心理因素(居民的选择和控制,维持居民的信仰和习惯);(3) 社会因素(与居民、家庭和工作人员的关系、公共环境以及与社区保持联系)。ACW组之间的主题没有明显的重要差异。居家环境与更高的工作满意度、更低的倦怠感、更低的员工流动率有关,不会导致员工痛苦,也不会导致安全感降低。居家环境可能对ACW有益。审查结果可以为居家环境的规划、实施和评估提供信息,最终提高ACW和RACF中的识别结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Asia Pacific Journal of Health Management
Asia Pacific Journal of Health Management HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
16.70%
发文量
51
审稿时长
9 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信