Violation of Labour Rights in the Context of Compulsory Vaccination Against Covid-19

Q3 Social Sciences
O. Yaroshenko, N. Melnychuk, R. Prokopiev, H. Anisimova, H. Kaplina
{"title":"Violation of Labour Rights in the Context of Compulsory Vaccination Against Covid-19","authors":"O. Yaroshenko, N. Melnychuk, R. Prokopiev, H. Anisimova, H. Kaplina","doi":"10.12775/clr.2022.017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of the article is to conduct research on the issue of whether compulsory vaccination, enshrined in international and national legal acts, violates labour rights. The main research method was a comparison method, which helped to compare the experience of different countries in restricting labour rights in the context of compulsory vaccination against COVID-19. Moreover, the main characteristics of restrictions on labour rights during the COVID-19 period were highlighted using the method of system analysis. The evolution of compulsory vaccination was analysed using a historical-logical method. A formal legal method was applied to generalise, classify, and systematize research results, as well as to present these results. The current outbreak of COVID-19 has provoked trends in discriminatory behaviour in the workplace. Therefore, the restrictions on labour rights must comply with international human rights standards, which, however, largely reflect a position that does not support compulsory vaccination.","PeriodicalId":36604,"journal":{"name":"Comparative Law Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comparative Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12775/clr.2022.017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The aim of the article is to conduct research on the issue of whether compulsory vaccination, enshrined in international and national legal acts, violates labour rights. The main research method was a comparison method, which helped to compare the experience of different countries in restricting labour rights in the context of compulsory vaccination against COVID-19. Moreover, the main characteristics of restrictions on labour rights during the COVID-19 period were highlighted using the method of system analysis. The evolution of compulsory vaccination was analysed using a historical-logical method. A formal legal method was applied to generalise, classify, and systematize research results, as well as to present these results. The current outbreak of COVID-19 has provoked trends in discriminatory behaviour in the workplace. Therefore, the restrictions on labour rights must comply with international human rights standards, which, however, largely reflect a position that does not support compulsory vaccination.
新冠肺炎强制疫苗接种背景下对劳工权利的侵犯
这篇文章的目的是研究国际和国家法律中规定的强制接种疫苗是否侵犯劳工权利的问题。主要的研究方法是比较方法,有助于比较不同国家在强制接种新冠肺炎疫苗的情况下限制劳工权利的经验。此外,还利用系统分析的方法强调了新冠肺炎期间限制劳工权利的主要特点。使用历史逻辑方法分析了强制疫苗接种的演变。采用正式的法律方法对研究结果进行概括、分类和系统化,并呈现这些结果。目前新冠肺炎的爆发引发了工作场所歧视行为的趋势。因此,对劳工权利的限制必须符合国际人权标准,但这在很大程度上反映了不支持强制接种疫苗的立场。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Comparative Law Review
Comparative Law Review Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信