On Brokers, Biases and Leaving the Veranda: Working with Research Brokers in Political Science Based Field Research

IF 1.2 Q3 POLITICAL SCIENCE
Anders Themnér
{"title":"On Brokers, Biases and Leaving the Veranda: Working with Research Brokers in Political Science Based Field Research","authors":"Anders Themnér","doi":"10.1080/13698249.2022.2031648","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In this paper I critically discuss the pros and cons of working with research brokers from a political science perspective. I do this by sharing my experiences of collaborating with two types of local “fixers” – cultural and communal brokers. I argue that even if similar approaches risk introducing a number of broker-induced biases, countermeasures can be taken to mitigate their effect: e.g. continuous triangulation, interviewing “sleepers” and asking in-depth questions to exclude interviewees who misrepresent themselves. However, researchers must be aware that working with multiple brokers can also generate methodological and ethical challenges that need to be taken into consideration.","PeriodicalId":51785,"journal":{"name":"Civil Wars","volume":"24 1","pages":"117 - 139"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Civil Wars","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13698249.2022.2031648","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

ABSTRACT In this paper I critically discuss the pros and cons of working with research brokers from a political science perspective. I do this by sharing my experiences of collaborating with two types of local “fixers” – cultural and communal brokers. I argue that even if similar approaches risk introducing a number of broker-induced biases, countermeasures can be taken to mitigate their effect: e.g. continuous triangulation, interviewing “sleepers” and asking in-depth questions to exclude interviewees who misrepresent themselves. However, researchers must be aware that working with multiple brokers can also generate methodological and ethical challenges that need to be taken into consideration.
论经纪人、偏见和离开走廊:在基于政治学的实地研究中与研究经纪人合作
在本文中,我从政治学的角度批判性地讨论了与研究经纪人合作的利弊。为此,我分享了自己与两种当地“中间人”——文化掮客和社区掮客——合作的经验。我认为,即使类似的方法有引入一些经纪人诱发的偏见的风险,也可以采取对策来减轻其影响:例如,连续三角测量,采访“睡眠者”,并提出深入的问题,以排除不如实陈述自己的受访者。然而,研究人员必须意识到,与多个经纪人合作也可能产生需要考虑的方法和道德挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Civil Wars
Civil Wars POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
18.20%
发文量
23
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信