{"title":"Лирика цинического разума: трикстер как лирический субъект","authors":"Марк Липовецкий (Mark Lipovetsky)","doi":"10.1016/j.ruslit.2023.07.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The article discusses manifestations of the trickster’s subjectivity in the works of contemporary Russian poets. While linking the trickster’s position in culture with Peter Sloterdijk’s discussion on cynicism/kynicism, the article suggests a typology of contemporary lyrical subjects developing different aspects of the trickster tradition, such as the imposter (illustrated by Prigov’s poetry), <em>skomorokh</em> (reinvented by Shish Brianskii), “the people’s poet” (as in Vsevolod Emelin’s poetry), and a “reflexive kynic” (exemplified by Andrei Rodionov). In conclusion, the cultural function of contemporary Russian trickster-like lyrical poetry is discussed through the lens of Giorgio Agamben’s interpretation of profanations and Michel de Certeau’s concept of practical tactics.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":43192,"journal":{"name":"RUSSIAN LITERATURE","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RUSSIAN LITERATURE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304347923000340","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE, SLAVIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The article discusses manifestations of the trickster’s subjectivity in the works of contemporary Russian poets. While linking the trickster’s position in culture with Peter Sloterdijk’s discussion on cynicism/kynicism, the article suggests a typology of contemporary lyrical subjects developing different aspects of the trickster tradition, such as the imposter (illustrated by Prigov’s poetry), skomorokh (reinvented by Shish Brianskii), “the people’s poet” (as in Vsevolod Emelin’s poetry), and a “reflexive kynic” (exemplified by Andrei Rodionov). In conclusion, the cultural function of contemporary Russian trickster-like lyrical poetry is discussed through the lens of Giorgio Agamben’s interpretation of profanations and Michel de Certeau’s concept of practical tactics.
期刊介绍:
Russian Literature combines issues devoted to special topics of Russian literature with contributions on related subjects in Croatian, Serbian, Czech, Slovak and Polish literatures. Moreover, several issues each year contain articles on heterogeneous subjects concerning Russian Literature. All methods and viewpoints are welcomed, provided they contribute something new, original or challenging to our understanding of Russian and other Slavic literatures. Russian Literature regularly publishes special issues devoted to: • the historical avant-garde in Russian literature and in the other Slavic literatures • the development of descriptive and theoretical poetics in Russian studies and in studies of other Slavic fields.