Organizations of public benefit: performance evaluation using MCDA approach

IF 0.4 Q4 ECONOMICS
D. Górecka, E. Chojnacka
{"title":"Organizations of public benefit: performance evaluation using MCDA approach","authors":"D. Górecka, E. Chojnacka","doi":"10.17535/CRORR.2017.0040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In many countries, organizations of public benefit play an important role inthe economy and are established only for charitable purposes. Serving the public interest is often connected with certain benefits, such as additional source of revenue, tax advantages or state grants, but also certain obligations, such as guaranteeing trustworthiness and transparency of operations. Taking the role of charities and voluntary organizations into consideration there is a great need to assess properly such entities whereas tools indicated for corporate finance are not appropriate since these units are established for purposes other than profit-making. Moreover, their range of activities is very different. Hence, new assessment methods are needed in order to evaluate them properly. For this reason the main aim of this paper is to propose and apply multi-criteria decision aiding (MCDA) approach to the problem of assessment of organizations of public benefit. The proposed procedure using EVAMIX method for mixed evaluations (deterministic and stochastic) has been employed in the process of appraising and ranking nine Public Benefit Organizations (PBOs) from one of Polish voivodships operating in the field of ‘Ecology, animals and heritage protection’, and eight charities from two neighboring English metropolitan boroughs, operating in the field of ‘Animals’. Rankings of these entities havebeen obtained so that, e.g., a potential donator would have a better base to make his or her decision regarding financial support.","PeriodicalId":44065,"journal":{"name":"Croatian Operational Research Review","volume":"8 1","pages":"613-629"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.17535/CRORR.2017.0040","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Croatian Operational Research Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17535/CRORR.2017.0040","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In many countries, organizations of public benefit play an important role inthe economy and are established only for charitable purposes. Serving the public interest is often connected with certain benefits, such as additional source of revenue, tax advantages or state grants, but also certain obligations, such as guaranteeing trustworthiness and transparency of operations. Taking the role of charities and voluntary organizations into consideration there is a great need to assess properly such entities whereas tools indicated for corporate finance are not appropriate since these units are established for purposes other than profit-making. Moreover, their range of activities is very different. Hence, new assessment methods are needed in order to evaluate them properly. For this reason the main aim of this paper is to propose and apply multi-criteria decision aiding (MCDA) approach to the problem of assessment of organizations of public benefit. The proposed procedure using EVAMIX method for mixed evaluations (deterministic and stochastic) has been employed in the process of appraising and ranking nine Public Benefit Organizations (PBOs) from one of Polish voivodships operating in the field of ‘Ecology, animals and heritage protection’, and eight charities from two neighboring English metropolitan boroughs, operating in the field of ‘Animals’. Rankings of these entities havebeen obtained so that, e.g., a potential donator would have a better base to make his or her decision regarding financial support.
公益组织:基于MCDA方法的绩效评估
在许多国家,公益组织在经济中发挥着重要作用,其成立只是为了慈善目的。为公众利益服务通常与某些利益有关,如额外的收入来源、税收优惠或国家拨款,但也与某些义务有关,如保证运营的可信度和透明度。考虑到慈善机构和志愿组织的作用,非常需要对这些实体进行适当的评估,而为公司融资而指定的工具并不合适,因为这些单位的设立目的不是营利。此外,他们的活动范围也大不相同。因此,需要新的评估方法,以便对其进行适当的评估。因此,本文的主要目的是提出并应用多准则决策辅助(MCDA)方法来解决公共利益组织的评估问题。使用EVAMIX方法进行混合评估(确定性和随机性)的拟议程序已用于评估和排名波兰一个省在“生态、动物和遗产保护”领域运作的九个公益组织(PBO),以及来自两个相邻的英国大都市区的八个慈善机构,在“动物”领域开展业务。已经获得了这些实体的排名,例如,潜在的捐赠者将有更好的基础来做出他或她关于财政支持的决定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
审稿时长
22 weeks
期刊介绍: Croatian Operational Research Review (CRORR) is the journal which publishes original scientific papers from the area of operational research. The purpose is to publish papers from various aspects of operational research (OR) with the aim of presenting scientific ideas that will contribute both to theoretical development and practical application of OR. The scope of the journal covers the following subject areas: linear and non-linear programming, integer programing, combinatorial and discrete optimization, multi-objective programming, stohastic models and optimization, scheduling, macroeconomics, economic theory, game theory, statistics and econometrics, marketing and data analysis, information and decision support systems, banking, finance, insurance, environment, energy, health, neural networks and fuzzy systems, control theory, simulation, practical OR and applications. The audience includes both researchers and practitioners from the area of operations research, applied mathematics, statistics, econometrics, intelligent methods, simulation, and other areas included in the above list of topics. The journal has an international board of editors, consisting of more than 30 editors – university professors from Croatia, Slovenia, USA, Italy, Germany, Austria and other coutries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信