{"title":"Military History from the Street","authors":"E. Morrison","doi":"10.1093/hwj/dbaa025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In Ireland and the Great War, the late Keith Jeffery argued that the 1914–18 conflict was an essential context for the Irish independence struggle, and that the Easter Rising (1916), the War of Independence (1919–21) and Civil War (1922–3) were integral parts of the same story. This is also the starting point of Dublin’s Great Wars, a ‘new military history’ and prosopography of British soldiers and Irish republicans who resided in Ireland’s capital city during these years. There is much to commend ‘military history from the street’, Grayson’s methodology of using ‘every source possible to draw in the military service of everyone from a given area’. Online sources have transformed the speed and ease with which researchers can search for and cross-reference information. The author’s approach is predicated largely on the vast word-searchable collections of primary-source records relating to the First World War that have become available online in recent years. Some marvellous material has been unearthed in British military pension and service records, diaries, newspapers, personal testimony and journals. Sixteen of Grayson’s twenty-one chapters contextualize and discuss the period up to the November 1918 Armistice. It is estimated that 210,000 men resident in Ireland joined the British armed forces over 1914–18, out of whom about 30,000 were killed and many thousands more wounded. This has been described by one historian as ‘proportionately the greatest deployment of armed manpower in the history of Irish militarism’. Grayson estimates that, in all, between 35,000 and 40,000 Dublin residents served in some branch of the British armed forces during the First World War, with over seventy percent fighting in the infantry. As with his previous study of Belfast, for the most part he eschews thematic analysis. The book consists mainly of chronologically ordered battle narratives punctuated with statistics, snippets of battlefield folklore – like the apocryphal recapture of guns by the 9th Lancers at Mons in October 1914 and rumours of a Turkish female sniper found dead at Gallipoli wearing fourteen soldiers’ identification badges around her neck – and biographical vignettes of individual","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/hwj/dbaa025","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/hwj/dbaa025","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In Ireland and the Great War, the late Keith Jeffery argued that the 1914–18 conflict was an essential context for the Irish independence struggle, and that the Easter Rising (1916), the War of Independence (1919–21) and Civil War (1922–3) were integral parts of the same story. This is also the starting point of Dublin’s Great Wars, a ‘new military history’ and prosopography of British soldiers and Irish republicans who resided in Ireland’s capital city during these years. There is much to commend ‘military history from the street’, Grayson’s methodology of using ‘every source possible to draw in the military service of everyone from a given area’. Online sources have transformed the speed and ease with which researchers can search for and cross-reference information. The author’s approach is predicated largely on the vast word-searchable collections of primary-source records relating to the First World War that have become available online in recent years. Some marvellous material has been unearthed in British military pension and service records, diaries, newspapers, personal testimony and journals. Sixteen of Grayson’s twenty-one chapters contextualize and discuss the period up to the November 1918 Armistice. It is estimated that 210,000 men resident in Ireland joined the British armed forces over 1914–18, out of whom about 30,000 were killed and many thousands more wounded. This has been described by one historian as ‘proportionately the greatest deployment of armed manpower in the history of Irish militarism’. Grayson estimates that, in all, between 35,000 and 40,000 Dublin residents served in some branch of the British armed forces during the First World War, with over seventy percent fighting in the infantry. As with his previous study of Belfast, for the most part he eschews thematic analysis. The book consists mainly of chronologically ordered battle narratives punctuated with statistics, snippets of battlefield folklore – like the apocryphal recapture of guns by the 9th Lancers at Mons in October 1914 and rumours of a Turkish female sniper found dead at Gallipoli wearing fourteen soldiers’ identification badges around her neck – and biographical vignettes of individual
在《爱尔兰与一战》一书中,已故的基思·杰弗瑞认为,1914年至1918年的冲突是爱尔兰独立斗争的重要背景,而复活节起义(1916年)、独立战争(1919年至1921年)和内战(1922年至1922年)是同一故事的组成部分。这也是《都柏林大战》(Dublin ' s Great Wars)的起点。《都柏林大战》是一部“新军事史”,记录了这些年来居住在爱尔兰首都的英国士兵和爱尔兰共和派。“来自街头的军事历史”有很多值得赞扬的地方,格雷森的方法是“利用一切可能的资源,从一个给定的地区吸引每个人的兵役”。在线资源已经改变了研究人员搜索和交叉参考信息的速度和便利性。作者的方法很大程度上是基于近年来在网上可以搜索到的与第一次世界大战有关的大量可搜索的原始记录。在英国军队养老金和服役记录、日记、报纸、个人证词和日记中发现了一些了不起的材料。格雷森的21个章节中有16个章节将1918年11月停战之前的时期作为背景进行了讨论。据估计,在1914年至1918年期间,有21万爱尔兰居民加入了英国武装部队,其中约3万人阵亡,数千人受伤。这被一位历史学家描述为“爱尔兰军国主义历史上最大规模的武装力量部署”。格雷森估计,在第一次世界大战期间,总共有3.5万至4万都柏林居民在英国武装部队的某些部门服役,其中超过70%的人在步兵部队服役。就像他之前对贝尔法斯特的研究一样,他在很大程度上避开了主题分析。这本书主要由按时间顺序排列的战斗叙述组成,其中穿插着统计数据、战场民间传说的片段——比如1914年10月第9枪兵团在蒙斯夺回枪支的杜撰故事,以及一名土耳其女狙击手被发现死于加里波利,脖子上戴着14名士兵的身份徽章的传言——以及个人的传记小特写
期刊介绍:
Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance.
Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.