URGENSI REKONSTRUKSI MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI DALAM MEMBERIKAN PERTIMBANGAN KEBIJAKAN HUKUM TERBUKA (OPEN LEGAL POLICY)

M. A. Fauzani, Fandi Nur Rohman
{"title":"URGENSI REKONSTRUKSI MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI DALAM MEMBERIKAN PERTIMBANGAN KEBIJAKAN HUKUM TERBUKA (OPEN LEGAL POLICY)","authors":"M. A. Fauzani, Fandi Nur Rohman","doi":"10.24002/jep.v35i2.2501","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research has two problem formulations, First, how the Constitutional Court's construction in giving consideration to \"open legal policy\"; Second, what is the urgency of the Constitutional Court's reconstruction in giving consideration to\"open legal policy\"? This research uses a normative juridical study using the statutory and conceptual approach. The results of this study are: First, that is a lack of clarity and consistency from the Constitutional Court in determining benchmarks for open legal policy considerations. Second, there are new concept been proposed: a) applying the doctrine of \"political question\"; b) The Constitutional Court still tests a norm based on formal and substantial requirements. The advice given is that Constitutional Court should take a position in accordance with the reconstruction proposed in this study.","PeriodicalId":52874,"journal":{"name":"Justitia Et Pax","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Justitia Et Pax","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24002/jep.v35i2.2501","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

This research has two problem formulations, First, how the Constitutional Court's construction in giving consideration to "open legal policy"; Second, what is the urgency of the Constitutional Court's reconstruction in giving consideration to"open legal policy"? This research uses a normative juridical study using the statutory and conceptual approach. The results of this study are: First, that is a lack of clarity and consistency from the Constitutional Court in determining benchmarks for open legal policy considerations. Second, there are new concept been proposed: a) applying the doctrine of "political question"; b) The Constitutional Court still tests a norm based on formal and substantial requirements. The advice given is that Constitutional Court should take a position in accordance with the reconstruction proposed in this study.
宪法法院在考虑开放政策方面的重复性重建
本研究有两个问题提法,一是宪法法院的建设如何兼顾“开放的法律政策”;第二,宪法法院在考虑“开放的法律政策”方面重建的紧迫性是什么?本研究采用法律和概念方法进行规范性司法研究。这项研究的结果是:首先,宪法法院在确定公开法律政策考虑的基准方面缺乏明确性和一致性。第二,提出了新的概念:(1)运用“政治问题”学说;b) 宪法法院仍在测试基于正式和实质性要求的规范。给出的建议是,宪法法院应根据本研究中提议的重建采取立场。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信