INSTITUTE OF PRE-EMPTION AND MEDIATION IN ENSURING THE RIGHTS OF INDIVIDUAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP SUBJECTS: PRACTICE AND PROSPECTS

Anna Rozhkova
{"title":"INSTITUTE OF PRE-EMPTION AND MEDIATION IN ENSURING THE RIGHTS OF INDIVIDUAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP SUBJECTS: PRACTICE AND PROSPECTS","authors":"Anna Rozhkova","doi":"10.17770/acj.v3i88.4230","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper is devoted to the issues of using prevention institutes and the mediation in rights ensuring institute of individual enterprise in the sphere of the control by public authorities. The aim of the research is to analyze the peculiarities of practice to use the methods of inspection by the state supervision agency in order to ensure the rights of    individual enterprise’s subject. The aim of the research is linked to the contradictory problems during the implementation of inspection’s legal nihilism of government officials’ right treatment during of inspections and possible essential risks for IE and effect lowering of rights securing. The novelty of the work is expressed in topicality and justification of the prevention institute in order to minimize the risks to ensure the legal consciousness and the rights of individual enterprise. According to this aim several tasks have been solved and as result some basic principles have been formulated and the conclusions were drawn. More precise definitions were provided to the understanding of distinction “government control” and “checking” via the assistance of intercommunication establishment through the general and special principles of material and procedural mutual concern, which are topical for an individual enterprise owing to minimization of administrative risks. Having been based the efficacy of Institute of prevention as the method of preventive measure and influence on the behavior of the characters of individual enterprise. So in sphere of rights ensuring of characters of Individual enterprise the principles of conclusive reasons for conducting preliminary verifications was suggested. The efficiency of the mediation institute in the sphere of public rights was justified.","PeriodicalId":54767,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research and Practice in Information Technology","volume":"3 1","pages":"177"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Research and Practice in Information Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17770/acj.v3i88.4230","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper is devoted to the issues of using prevention institutes and the mediation in rights ensuring institute of individual enterprise in the sphere of the control by public authorities. The aim of the research is to analyze the peculiarities of practice to use the methods of inspection by the state supervision agency in order to ensure the rights of    individual enterprise’s subject. The aim of the research is linked to the contradictory problems during the implementation of inspection’s legal nihilism of government officials’ right treatment during of inspections and possible essential risks for IE and effect lowering of rights securing. The novelty of the work is expressed in topicality and justification of the prevention institute in order to minimize the risks to ensure the legal consciousness and the rights of individual enterprise. According to this aim several tasks have been solved and as result some basic principles have been formulated and the conclusions were drawn. More precise definitions were provided to the understanding of distinction “government control” and “checking” via the assistance of intercommunication establishment through the general and special principles of material and procedural mutual concern, which are topical for an individual enterprise owing to minimization of administrative risks. Having been based the efficacy of Institute of prevention as the method of preventive measure and influence on the behavior of the characters of individual enterprise. So in sphere of rights ensuring of characters of Individual enterprise the principles of conclusive reasons for conducting preliminary verifications was suggested. The efficiency of the mediation institute in the sphere of public rights was justified.
个体创业主体权利保障中的先行先试与调解制度:实践与展望
本文主要探讨了在公共权力控制范围内,个体企业权利保障机构运用预防机构和调解机制的问题。本研究的目的是分析使用国家监督机构检查方法以确保个体企业主体权利的实践特点。本研究的目的是联系检查实施过程中存在的矛盾问题,即政府官员在检查中的权利待遇法律虚无主义,以及IE可能存在的本质风险和权利保障效果的降低。这项工作的新颖性体现在预防机构的主题性和正当性上,以最大限度地减少风险,确保企业个体的法律意识和权利。根据这一目标,解决了几个任务,并制定了一些基本原则,得出了一些结论。为理解“政府控制”和“检查”的区别提供了更精确的定义,通过物质和程序相互关心的一般和特殊原则,协助建立相互联系,这是单个企业的主题,因为行政风险最小化。以预防效果研究所作为预防措施的方法及其对个体企业行为特征的影响。因此,在个体企业性质的权利保障方面,提出了初步论证的结论性理由原则。调解机构在公共权利领域的效率是合理的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Research and Practice in Information Technology
Journal of Research and Practice in Information Technology 工程技术-计算机:软件工程
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信