Cladistic analysis of Spartocerini Amyot & Serville 1843 (Hemiptera, Coreidae, Coreinae)

IF 1.3 3区农林科学 Q2 ENTOMOLOGY

Insect Systematics & Evolution Pub Date : 2020-06-09 DOI:10.1163/1876312x-bja10011

Wanessa da S. Costa, A. Barcellos, H. Brailovsky

引用次数: 2

Abstract

Among the 32 tribes of Coreinae currently recognized, Spartocerini comprises 66 extant species distributed in six genera: Euagona Dallas, Eubule Stål, Menenotus Laporte, Molchina Amyot & Serville, Sephina Amyot & Serville and Spartocera Laporte, distributed exclusively in the Western Hemisphere. We performed cladistic analyses using equal (EW) and also implied weighting (IW) based on 56 terminals (23 belonging to the ingroup) and 115 morphological characters, including male and female genitalia. Spartocerini was polyphyletic both under EW and IW because Molchina was nested in Mictini. We remove Molchina from Spartocerini and consider the genus as incertae sedis. Spartocera, Eubule, and Sephina were not recovered as monophyletic. Sephina pubera (Erichson) is considered as incertae sedis within Spartocerini, Eubule ampliata (Valdés) is transferred to Spartocera as a new combination, and Mamurius is included in Anisoscelini.

查看原文本刊更多论文

Paratocerini Amyot和Serville 1843的分支系统分析（半翅目，珊瑚科，珊瑚亚科）

在目前已知的32个科中，Spartocerini包括66个现存种，分布于6个属:Euagona Dallas、Eubule st、Menenotus Laporte、Molchina Amyot & Serville、Sephina Amyot & Serville和Spartocera Laporte，仅分布于西半球。我们基于56个终端(23个属于内群)和115个形态特征(包括男性和女性生殖器)，采用等量加权(EW)和隐含加权(IW)进行了分支分析。在东西向和中西向下，米氏梭菌都是多系的，因为密氏梭菌巢在米氏梭菌中。我们将Molchina从Spartocerini中移除，并认为该属为incertae sedis。Spartocera、Eubule和Sephina未被恢复为单系。在spartoceria中，将Sephina (Erichson)视为incertae sedis，将Eubule ampliata (vald录影带)作为新组合转移到Spartocera中，将Mamurius纳入Anisoscelini中。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Insect Systematics & Evolution 生物-进化生物学

CiteScore

3.00

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

>12 weeks

期刊介绍： Insect Systematics & Evolution (ISE) publishes original papers on all aspects of systematic entomology and the evolutionary history of both extant and extinct insects and related groups. Priority is given to taxonomic revisions and phylogenetic studies employing morphological and molecular data. ISE also welcomes reviews and syntheses that can appeal to a wide community of systematic entomologists. Single species descriptions, regional checklists, and phylogenetic studies based on few taxa or single molecular markers will generally not be accepted.