Compensation for loss of control over personal data

Q2 Social Sciences

Journal of Media Law Pub Date : 2022-01-02 DOI:10.1080/17577632.2022.2089629

John T. Hartshorne

引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT This commentary examines the Supreme Court’s decision in Lloyd v Google LLC. It outlines the background to the claim and the legal ruling in the case. It considers the implications of the decision for claims relating to loss of control over personal data, and the potential relevance of the decision to claims for compensation under the UK General Data Protection Regulation and Data Protection Act 2018. It also highlights some significant remarks made by the Supreme Court relating to claims in the tort of misuse of private information.

查看原文本刊更多论文

失去对个人数据控制的赔偿

摘要本评论审查了最高法院在Lloyd诉谷歌有限责任公司一案中的裁决。它概述了索赔的背景和本案的法律裁决。它考虑了该决定对与失去对个人数据的控制有关的索赔的影响，以及该决定对根据《英国通用数据保护条例》和《2018年数据保护法》提出的索赔的潜在相关性。它还强调了最高法院关于滥用私人信息侵权索赔的一些重要意见。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Journal of Media Law Social Sciences-Law

CiteScore

0.90

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The only platform for focused, rigorous analysis of global developments in media law, this peer-reviewed journal, launched in Summer 2009, is: essential for teaching and research, essential for practice, essential for policy-making. It turns the spotlight on all those aspects of law which impinge on and shape modern media practices - from regulation and ownership, to libel law and constitutional aspects of broadcasting such as free speech and privacy, obscenity laws, copyright, piracy, and other aspects of IT law. The result is the first journal to take a serious view of law through the lens. The first issues feature articles on a wide range of topics such as: Developments in Defamation · Balancing Freedom of Expression and Privacy in the European Court of Human Rights · The Future of Public Television · Cameras in the Courtroom - Media Access to Classified Documents · Advertising Revenue v Editorial Independence · Gordon Ramsay: Obscenity Regulation Pioneer?