Sustainability is Dead, Long Live Sustainability! Paving the Way to Include ‘The People’ in Sustainability

IF 4 2区 管理学 Q2 MANAGEMENT
Yannick Griep, J. M. Kraak, Elizabeth M. Beekman
{"title":"Sustainability is Dead, Long Live Sustainability! Paving the Way to Include ‘The People’ in Sustainability","authors":"Yannick Griep, J. M. Kraak, Elizabeth M. Beekman","doi":"10.1177/10596011221127107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In today’s world, organisations face an ongoing paradox: relying on (near) slave labour in South-East Asia to satisfy clients’ desire for cheap clothing, or producing locally and thus charging a premium price? Sometimes these paradoxes have no ‘better alternative’ (making a choice between the plague or cholera); continuing to rely on fossil fuels such as oil and gas to keep our cars running or relying on children in sub-Saharan Africa to mine the necessary cobalt minerals to create our electric cars? Debate on such topics is present in the sustainability literature. Sustainability refers to a paradigm involving strategic long-term thinking on environmental, social and economic dimensions in order to meet the companies’ current needs ‘without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs’ (World Commission on Environment and Development, 1987, p. 43). In other words, sustainability is traditionally defined as integrating reasonable economic, environmental and social growth opportunities into business strategies (following the same logic as the famous triple-p bottom line that refers to planet, profit and people and which is widely used in CSR; Gallagher et al., 2018). Once just a passing fad, ‘sustainability’ can now be found everywhere and has","PeriodicalId":48143,"journal":{"name":"Group & Organization Management","volume":"48 1","pages":"966 - 980"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Group & Organization Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10596011221127107","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

In today’s world, organisations face an ongoing paradox: relying on (near) slave labour in South-East Asia to satisfy clients’ desire for cheap clothing, or producing locally and thus charging a premium price? Sometimes these paradoxes have no ‘better alternative’ (making a choice between the plague or cholera); continuing to rely on fossil fuels such as oil and gas to keep our cars running or relying on children in sub-Saharan Africa to mine the necessary cobalt minerals to create our electric cars? Debate on such topics is present in the sustainability literature. Sustainability refers to a paradigm involving strategic long-term thinking on environmental, social and economic dimensions in order to meet the companies’ current needs ‘without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs’ (World Commission on Environment and Development, 1987, p. 43). In other words, sustainability is traditionally defined as integrating reasonable economic, environmental and social growth opportunities into business strategies (following the same logic as the famous triple-p bottom line that refers to planet, profit and people and which is widely used in CSR; Gallagher et al., 2018). Once just a passing fad, ‘sustainability’ can now be found everywhere and has
可持续发展已死,可持续发展万岁!为将“人民”纳入可持续发展铺平道路
在当今世界,组织面临着一个持续的悖论:依靠东南亚的(近乎)奴隶劳动来满足客户对廉价服装的渴望,还是在当地生产并因此收取溢价?有时,这些悖论没有“更好的选择”(在瘟疫或霍乱之间做出选择);继续依靠石油和天然气等化石燃料来维持我们的汽车运行,还是依靠撒哈拉以南非洲的儿童开采必要的钴矿物来制造我们的电动汽车?可持续性文献中有关于此类主题的辩论。可持续性是指一种模式,涉及对环境、社会和经济层面的长期战略思考,以“在不影响子孙后代满足自身需求的能力的情况下”满足公司当前的需求(世界环境与发展委员会,1987年,第43页)。换言之,可持续性传统上被定义为将合理的经济、环境和社会增长机会融入商业战略(遵循与著名的三重p底线相同的逻辑,该底线指的是地球、利润和人,在企业社会责任中广泛使用;Gallagher等人,2018)。“可持续发展”曾经只是一种昙花一现的时尚,现在随处可见
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
12.50%
发文量
71
期刊介绍: Group & Organization Management (GOM) publishes the work of scholars and professionals who extend management and organization theory and address the implications of this for practitioners. Innovation, conceptual sophistication, methodological rigor, and cutting-edge scholarship are the driving principles. Topics include teams, group processes, leadership, organizational behavior, organizational theory, strategic management, organizational communication, gender and diversity, cross-cultural analysis, and organizational development and change, but all articles dealing with individual, group, organizational and/or environmental dimensions are appropriate.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信