Conserving (with) David Lynch. A Treatment Conditioned by Communication

IF 0.7 4区 社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
M. Wachowiak
{"title":"Conserving (with) David Lynch. A Treatment Conditioned by Communication","authors":"M. Wachowiak","doi":"10.1080/01971360.2021.1907673","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT A chance for cooperation between artist and conservator appeared during the exhibition of David Lynch's works in the Centre of Contemporary Art in Toruń. This case considers Lynch's diverse materials, secret techniques, and desire to repair his own works, with just the assistance of a conservator. The author's decision to take part in the first non-traditional artist's interventions started the communication. The collaboration enabled the recognition of original materials and artists' aesthetical expectations – and as a result, proper conservation treatment, based on built trust and mutual knowledge exchange. Assisting in the artist's repair allowed a conservator to treat subsequent works using ethically acceptable conservation methods, to recognize, research, and document materials and techniques, and to define the artist's preferences for future treatments. This case study provides a framework to approach an artist's active presence as a precedent; their impact on the conservation process should be helping to create an inclusive, dynamic, and flexible process, most effective when remaining open-ended. This article presents the axiological shift of declaring the artist as the most important decision-making voice and considers the ethical consequences to both conservation practice and the artworks themselves if such an inclusive process were to be embraced.","PeriodicalId":17165,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Institute for Conservation","volume":"60 1","pages":"186 - 196"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/01971360.2021.1907673","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Institute for Conservation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01971360.2021.1907673","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT A chance for cooperation between artist and conservator appeared during the exhibition of David Lynch's works in the Centre of Contemporary Art in Toruń. This case considers Lynch's diverse materials, secret techniques, and desire to repair his own works, with just the assistance of a conservator. The author's decision to take part in the first non-traditional artist's interventions started the communication. The collaboration enabled the recognition of original materials and artists' aesthetical expectations – and as a result, proper conservation treatment, based on built trust and mutual knowledge exchange. Assisting in the artist's repair allowed a conservator to treat subsequent works using ethically acceptable conservation methods, to recognize, research, and document materials and techniques, and to define the artist's preferences for future treatments. This case study provides a framework to approach an artist's active presence as a precedent; their impact on the conservation process should be helping to create an inclusive, dynamic, and flexible process, most effective when remaining open-ended. This article presents the axiological shift of declaring the artist as the most important decision-making voice and considers the ethical consequences to both conservation practice and the artworks themselves if such an inclusive process were to be embraced.
与大卫·林奇合作。以沟通为条件的治疗
摘要在托伦当代艺术中心举办的大卫·林奇作品展上,艺术家和保护人迎来了合作的机会。本案考虑了林奇的各种材料、秘密技术,以及在监护人的帮助下修复自己作品的愿望。作者决定参与第一位非传统艺术家的干预,开启了这场交流。合作使人们能够认识到原始材料和艺术家的审美期望,并因此在建立信任和相互知识交流的基础上进行适当的保护处理。协助艺术家修复,使保护人能够使用道德上可接受的保护方法处理后续作品,识别、研究和记录材料和技术,并确定艺术家对未来处理的偏好。本案例研究提供了一个框架,将艺术家的积极存在作为先例;它们对保护过程的影响应该有助于创建一个包容、动态和灵活的过程,当保持开放时最有效。本文介绍了宣布艺术家为最重要决策声音的价值论转变,并考虑了如果接受这样一个包容性的过程,对保护实践和艺术品本身的伦理后果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
期刊介绍: The American Institute for Conservation is the largest conservation membership organization in the United States, and counts among its more than 3000 members the majority of professional conservators, conservation educators and conservation scientists worldwide. The Journal of the American Institute for Conservation (JAIC, or the Journal) is the primary vehicle for the publication of peer-reviewed technical studies, research papers, treatment case studies and ethics and standards discussions relating to the broad field of conservation and preservation of historic and cultural works. Subscribers to the JAIC include AIC members, both individuals and institutions, as well as major libraries and universities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信