Reading Himself and Others: Roth's Why Write? and Sartre's "Why Write?"

Q2 Arts and Humanities
James Duban
{"title":"Reading Himself and Others: Roth's Why Write? and Sartre's \"Why Write?\"","authors":"James Duban","doi":"10.1353/prs.2023.0003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:What might readers infer from the identical titles and related concerns of Sartre's \"Pourquoi écrire?\" (\"Why Write?\") and Roth's Why Write?, his collected nonfiction, 1960-2013? Some of the concerns of that volume appear to link the more pervasive synthesis of nothingness and possibility in Sartre's Being and Nothingness (1943) to Arthur Koestler's advocacy, in Insight and Outlook (1949), of \"bisociative\" cognition. At stake, for Roth, when reading himself and others, are incisive rejoinders to \"insensate readers\" who, ignoring the difference between personal identity and imaginative excursion, surrender personal responsibility while denigrating artistic prowess.","PeriodicalId":37093,"journal":{"name":"Philip Roth Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philip Roth Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/prs.2023.0003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract:What might readers infer from the identical titles and related concerns of Sartre's "Pourquoi écrire?" ("Why Write?") and Roth's Why Write?, his collected nonfiction, 1960-2013? Some of the concerns of that volume appear to link the more pervasive synthesis of nothingness and possibility in Sartre's Being and Nothingness (1943) to Arthur Koestler's advocacy, in Insight and Outlook (1949), of "bisociative" cognition. At stake, for Roth, when reading himself and others, are incisive rejoinders to "insensate readers" who, ignoring the difference between personal identity and imaginative excursion, surrender personal responsibility while denigrating artistic prowess.
阅读自己与他人:罗斯的《为什么写作?》以及萨特的《为什么写作?》
摘要:读者可以从萨特的《Pourquoi samcrire》的相同标题和相关关注点中推断出什么?(《为什么写作?》)和罗斯的《为什么写作?》他的非虚构类文集(1960-2013)?该卷的一些关注似乎将萨特的《存在与虚无》(1943)中更普遍的虚无和可能性的综合与阿瑟·凯斯特勒在《洞察与展望》(1949)中倡导的“分离”认知联系起来。对于罗斯来说,在阅读自己和他人的作品时,他对“麻木的读者”进行了尖锐的反驳,这些读者忽视了个人身份和想象漫游之间的区别,放弃了个人责任,同时贬低了艺术才能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Philip Roth Studies
Philip Roth Studies Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信