Inclusive and resilient shelter guide: accounting for the needs of informal settlements in Solomon Islands

IF 0.9 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
M. Vahanvati, D. McEvoy, U. Iyer-Raniga
{"title":"Inclusive and resilient shelter guide: accounting for the needs of informal settlements in Solomon Islands","authors":"M. Vahanvati, D. McEvoy, U. Iyer-Raniga","doi":"10.1108/ijdrbe-10-2022-0098","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis paper aims to highlight the localised shelter solutions to fulfil adequate and disaster resilient housing needs of urban informal settlers of Honiara, the capital city of Solomon Islands, in a way that is sensitive to their unique challenges, values and aspirations, is gender- and disability-inclusive, and considers housing from the complete lifecycle of a disaster (pre-, during- and post-).\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nQualitative data was gathered through empirical research through five community workshops at five hotspot settlements, two stakeholder workshops and a stakeholder interview. Semi-structured questions as well as photographs of housing and settlement were used for data collection. With an emphasis on self-recovery, the identified shelter needs were then matched with the roles and responsibilities of the Government to support a process of “assisted” self-preparedness and recovery.\n\n\nFindings\nThe output of the research was the Solomon Islands Shelter Guide. This paper draws from the Guide to present some of the findings. One of the key findings was an emphasis on shelter self-preparedness and self-recovery. However, in order for them to do that, they needed a combination of assistance – technical knowledge, materials and financial support – which is tailored to their settlement’s specific needs and based on hazard damage assessment. While the Guide provides one form of the assistance (i.e. technical), this paper is a call for action from the Solomon Islands Government and shelter responders to fulfil the rest of the community needs for shelter adequacy.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nThe paper contributes to existing scholarship on shelter after disasters by adding “assisted” in front of self-recovery, in line with the limited access to resources by the most vulnerable to recover, despite housing being” a human right and definition of adequate housing (UN-Habitat, 2015, 2021), which includes freedom of choice, entitlements and meeting minimum adequacy criteria.\n\n\nPractical implications\nThere are many implications of this research. Since the publication of the Shelter Guide, there is excitement among most humanitarian and development agencies, government authorities and the local communities in Honiara. The Guide forms the first step in contributing to identified needs and strengthening community capacities to self-build, self-recover or self-retrofit one’s house based on their own choice of materials, design, social and economic circumstance. However, it provides one of the three elements identified as needs by the communities, as i) technical guidance, and a kit-of parts for multi-hazard safe housing, ii) financial and economic assistance and iii) a political voice or being supported and heard by the government. The research team are working with the same five urban informal communities in 2022–2023 to develop and operationalise local disaster plans (in partnership with local non-government organisations), capacity-building activities and translation of the Shelter Guide into technical posters (for local builders) and graphic novel in local pidgin language, as part of the Climate Resilient Honiara project (funded by the United Nations framework convention on climate change (UNFCCC) Adaptation fund and administered by UN-Habitat). In the longer term it would be worth evaluating the practical implications of the Guide or to examine whether the proposed socio-technical and governance guidance will find roots in the local culture.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nWhile the Guide adhered to internationally agreed concepts of self-recovery, incremental shelter and core space, it contributes to existing scholarship on shelter after disasters by adding “assisted” in front of self-recovery, in line with housing as a human right and adequate housing (UN-Habitat, 2015, 2021), including freedom of choice, entitlements and meet minimum adequacy criteria, all of which require materials and financial assistance by the relevant in-country authorities.\n","PeriodicalId":45983,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijdrbe-10-2022-0098","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to highlight the localised shelter solutions to fulfil adequate and disaster resilient housing needs of urban informal settlers of Honiara, the capital city of Solomon Islands, in a way that is sensitive to their unique challenges, values and aspirations, is gender- and disability-inclusive, and considers housing from the complete lifecycle of a disaster (pre-, during- and post-). Design/methodology/approach Qualitative data was gathered through empirical research through five community workshops at five hotspot settlements, two stakeholder workshops and a stakeholder interview. Semi-structured questions as well as photographs of housing and settlement were used for data collection. With an emphasis on self-recovery, the identified shelter needs were then matched with the roles and responsibilities of the Government to support a process of “assisted” self-preparedness and recovery. Findings The output of the research was the Solomon Islands Shelter Guide. This paper draws from the Guide to present some of the findings. One of the key findings was an emphasis on shelter self-preparedness and self-recovery. However, in order for them to do that, they needed a combination of assistance – technical knowledge, materials and financial support – which is tailored to their settlement’s specific needs and based on hazard damage assessment. While the Guide provides one form of the assistance (i.e. technical), this paper is a call for action from the Solomon Islands Government and shelter responders to fulfil the rest of the community needs for shelter adequacy. Research limitations/implications The paper contributes to existing scholarship on shelter after disasters by adding “assisted” in front of self-recovery, in line with the limited access to resources by the most vulnerable to recover, despite housing being” a human right and definition of adequate housing (UN-Habitat, 2015, 2021), which includes freedom of choice, entitlements and meeting minimum adequacy criteria. Practical implications There are many implications of this research. Since the publication of the Shelter Guide, there is excitement among most humanitarian and development agencies, government authorities and the local communities in Honiara. The Guide forms the first step in contributing to identified needs and strengthening community capacities to self-build, self-recover or self-retrofit one’s house based on their own choice of materials, design, social and economic circumstance. However, it provides one of the three elements identified as needs by the communities, as i) technical guidance, and a kit-of parts for multi-hazard safe housing, ii) financial and economic assistance and iii) a political voice or being supported and heard by the government. The research team are working with the same five urban informal communities in 2022–2023 to develop and operationalise local disaster plans (in partnership with local non-government organisations), capacity-building activities and translation of the Shelter Guide into technical posters (for local builders) and graphic novel in local pidgin language, as part of the Climate Resilient Honiara project (funded by the United Nations framework convention on climate change (UNFCCC) Adaptation fund and administered by UN-Habitat). In the longer term it would be worth evaluating the practical implications of the Guide or to examine whether the proposed socio-technical and governance guidance will find roots in the local culture. Originality/value While the Guide adhered to internationally agreed concepts of self-recovery, incremental shelter and core space, it contributes to existing scholarship on shelter after disasters by adding “assisted” in front of self-recovery, in line with housing as a human right and adequate housing (UN-Habitat, 2015, 2021), including freedom of choice, entitlements and meet minimum adequacy criteria, all of which require materials and financial assistance by the relevant in-country authorities.
包容性和弹性住房指南:考虑所罗门群岛非正规住区的需求
本文旨在强调满足所罗门群岛首都霍尼亚拉城市非正式定居者充足和抗灾住房需求的地方住房解决方案,以一种对其独特挑战、价值观和愿望敏感的方式,性别和残疾包容性,并从灾难的整个生命周期(前、中、后)考虑住房。设计/方法/方法通过在五个热点聚落举办的五个社区研讨会、两次利益相关者研讨会和一次利益相关者访谈,通过实证研究收集了定性数据。数据收集使用了半结构化问题以及住房和定居点的照片。在强调自我恢复的情况下,确定的住房需要随后与政府支持“协助”自我准备和恢复进程的作用和责任相匹配。这项研究的成果是《所罗门群岛住房指南》。本文从《指南》中摘录了一些调查结果。其中一项重要发现是强调住房自我准备和自我恢复。然而,为了使他们做到这一点,他们需要结合援助- -技术知识、材料和财政支助- -这些援助是根据他们住区的具体需要和危害损害评估而量身定做的。虽然《指南》提供了一种形式的援助(即技术援助),但本文呼吁所罗门群岛政府和住房应答者采取行动,以满足社区对住房充足性的其他需求。尽管住房是“一项人权”和适当住房的定义(联合国人居署,2015年,2021年),其中包括选择自由、权利和满足最低适当性标准,但由于最脆弱的恢复者获得资源的机会有限,因此,本文对灾后住房的现有学术研究做出了贡献,在自我恢复之前添加了“协助”一词。实际意义这项研究有许多意义。自从《住房指南》出版以来,霍尼亚拉的大多数人道主义和发展机构、政府当局和当地社区都感到兴奋。《指南》是帮助满足已确定的需求和加强社区根据自己选择的材料、设计、社会和经济环境自我建造、自我修复或自我改造房屋的能力的第一步。然而,它提供了被社区确定为需要的三个要素中的一个,即i)技术指导和多灾害安全住房的成套部件,ii)财政和经济援助,以及iii)政治声音或得到政府的支持和倾听。研究小组将在2022-2023年与同样的五个城市非正式社区合作,制定和实施当地灾害计划(与当地非政府组织合作),开展能力建设活动,并将《住房指南》翻译成技术海报(供当地建筑商使用)和当地洋泾浜语言的图画小说。作为气候韧性霍尼亚拉项目(由联合国气候变化框架公约(UNFCCC)适应基金资助,联合国人居署管理)的一部分。从长期来看,值得评估《指南》的实际影响,或审查拟议的社会技术和治理指南是否能在当地文化中找到根源。原创性/价值虽然《指南》坚持国际公认的自我恢复、增量住房和核心空间的概念,但它通过在自我恢复和适当住房(联合国人居署,2015年,2021年)之前添加“协助”一词,为灾后住房的现有学术研究做出了贡献,包括选择自由、权利和满足最低充分性标准。所有这些都需要有关国内当局提供物资和财政援助。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
6.20%
发文量
49
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信