Residents’ and Family Perspectives of Involuntary Healthcare Facility Closure and Relocation

R. Weaver, K. Roberto, N. Brossoie, P. Teaster
{"title":"Residents’ and Family Perspectives of Involuntary Healthcare Facility Closure and Relocation","authors":"R. Weaver, K. Roberto, N. Brossoie, P. Teaster","doi":"10.18278/jep.2.1.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Older adults who receive care in a healthcare facility certified by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services receive services mandated and regulated by state and federal policy to ensure that basic quality and safety standards are met. Termination of certification due to ongoing care deficiencies results in the involuntary relocation of residents receiving Medicare or Medicaid services to another healthcare facility. If a facility ultimately closes, all residents are displaced. Facility decertification happens infrequently, but when it does occur, it affects both residents and their families. Few studies have examined resident input and the role that family plays in the relocation process. The purpose of this study was to explore residents’ and families’ perceptions of the relocation process and its effect on residents’ health and wellbeing. The study sample included 27 residents and 93 family members from two facilities that lost their certification. Semi-structured, audio-recorded interviews conducted with participants either in-person or by telephone focused on perceptions of relocation processes, relocation challenges and stressors, and physical and mental effects on residents. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analyzed using an open coding process to identify common themes and patterns in the data. Four interrelated, overarching themes emerged from the analysis: 1) awareness of need to relocate; 2) notification of need to relocate; 3) involvement in relocation decisions; and 4) relocation stressors. Neither residents nor families were satisfied with the re-location process and offered multiple suggestions to guide policy and practice to improve their involuntary relocation experiences.","PeriodicalId":93460,"journal":{"name":"Journal of elder policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of elder policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18278/jep.2.1.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Older adults who receive care in a healthcare facility certified by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services receive services mandated and regulated by state and federal policy to ensure that basic quality and safety standards are met. Termination of certification due to ongoing care deficiencies results in the involuntary relocation of residents receiving Medicare or Medicaid services to another healthcare facility. If a facility ultimately closes, all residents are displaced. Facility decertification happens infrequently, but when it does occur, it affects both residents and their families. Few studies have examined resident input and the role that family plays in the relocation process. The purpose of this study was to explore residents’ and families’ perceptions of the relocation process and its effect on residents’ health and wellbeing. The study sample included 27 residents and 93 family members from two facilities that lost their certification. Semi-structured, audio-recorded interviews conducted with participants either in-person or by telephone focused on perceptions of relocation processes, relocation challenges and stressors, and physical and mental effects on residents. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analyzed using an open coding process to identify common themes and patterns in the data. Four interrelated, overarching themes emerged from the analysis: 1) awareness of need to relocate; 2) notification of need to relocate; 3) involvement in relocation decisions; and 4) relocation stressors. Neither residents nor families were satisfied with the re-location process and offered multiple suggestions to guide policy and practice to improve their involuntary relocation experiences.
非自愿医疗机构关闭和搬迁的居民和家庭视角
在医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心认证的医疗机构接受护理的老年人将获得州和联邦政策规定和监管的服务,以确保达到基本质量和安全标准。由于持续的护理不足而终止认证,导致接受医疗保险或医疗补助服务的居民非自愿搬迁到另一家医疗机构。如果一个设施最终关闭,所有居民都将流离失所。设施取消认证的情况很少发生,但一旦发生,就会影响到居民及其家人。很少有研究考察居民的投入以及家庭在搬迁过程中所扮演的角色。本研究的目的是探讨居民和家庭对搬迁过程的看法及其对居民健康和福祉的影响。研究样本包括来自两个失去认证的设施的27名居民和93名家庭成员。面对面或通过电话对参与者进行的半结构化录音采访,重点关注对搬迁过程的看法、搬迁挑战和压力源,以及对居民的身心影响。访谈被逐字转录,并使用开放的编码过程进行分析,以确定数据中的共同主题和模式。分析得出了四个相互关联的总体主题:1)认识到搬迁的必要性;2) 需要搬迁的通知;3) 参与搬迁决策;以及4)迁移压力源。居民和家庭都不满意重新安置的过程,并提出了多项建议来指导政策和实践,以改善他们的非自愿搬迁体验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信